初级保健医生更喜欢听写的出院摘要还是电脑生成的出院摘要?

J E Brazy, D L Langkamp, N D Brazy, R F De Luna
{"title":"初级保健医生更喜欢听写的出院摘要还是电脑生成的出院摘要?","authors":"J E Brazy,&nbsp;D L Langkamp,&nbsp;N D Brazy,&nbsp;R F De Luna","doi":"10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330076024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the preference of primary care physicians for computer-generated vs dictated discharge summaries from a neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey mailed to primary care physicians.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Regional referral area of a level III neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pediatricians and family medicine physicians caring for infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 questionnaires sent, 45 (78%) were returned. Overall, 33 physicians (73%) either strongly or mildly preferred the computer-generated discharge summary; eight (18%) had no preference; and four (9%) preferred the dictated discharge summary (P < .001). The category of strongest preference was relevance of information for continued patient care. Preference for type of discharge summary was not significantly influenced by time in practice, type of practice, preference to read or scan summaries, or frequency of computer use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care physicians prefer computed-generated discharge summaries to dictated discharge summaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":75474,"journal":{"name":"American journal of diseases of children (1960)","volume":"147 9","pages":"986-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330076024","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do primary care physicians prefer dictated or computer-generated discharge summaries?\",\"authors\":\"J E Brazy,&nbsp;D L Langkamp,&nbsp;N D Brazy,&nbsp;R F De Luna\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330076024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the preference of primary care physicians for computer-generated vs dictated discharge summaries from a neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Survey mailed to primary care physicians.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Regional referral area of a level III neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Pediatricians and family medicine physicians caring for infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 58 questionnaires sent, 45 (78%) were returned. Overall, 33 physicians (73%) either strongly or mildly preferred the computer-generated discharge summary; eight (18%) had no preference; and four (9%) preferred the dictated discharge summary (P < .001). The category of strongest preference was relevance of information for continued patient care. Preference for type of discharge summary was not significantly influenced by time in practice, type of practice, preference to read or scan summaries, or frequency of computer use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Primary care physicians prefer computed-generated discharge summaries to dictated discharge summaries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of diseases of children (1960)\",\"volume\":\"147 9\",\"pages\":\"986-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330076024\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of diseases of children (1960)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330076024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of diseases of children (1960)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1993.02160330076024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

目的:确定初级保健医生对计算机生成和口述新生儿重症监护病房出院总结的偏好。设计:调查问卷邮寄给初级保健医生。环境:区域转诊区三级新生儿重症监护病房。参与者:照顾新生儿重症监护病房出院婴儿的儿科医生和家庭医学医生。结果:共发放问卷58份,回收问卷45份(78%)。总体而言,33名医生(73%)强烈或轻微倾向于电脑生成的出院总结;8人(18%)没有偏好;4例(9%)更倾向于遵医嘱的出院总结(P < 0.001)。最强烈的偏好类别是与患者持续护理相关的信息。对出院总结类型的偏好不受实践时间、实践类型、阅读或扫描摘要的偏好或计算机使用频率的显著影响。结论:初级保健医生更喜欢计算机生成的出院摘要而不是口述的出院摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do primary care physicians prefer dictated or computer-generated discharge summaries?

Objective: To determine the preference of primary care physicians for computer-generated vs dictated discharge summaries from a neonatal intensive care unit.

Design: Survey mailed to primary care physicians.

Setting: Regional referral area of a level III neonatal intensive care unit.

Participants: Pediatricians and family medicine physicians caring for infants discharged from the neonatal intensive care unit.

Results: Of 58 questionnaires sent, 45 (78%) were returned. Overall, 33 physicians (73%) either strongly or mildly preferred the computer-generated discharge summary; eight (18%) had no preference; and four (9%) preferred the dictated discharge summary (P < .001). The category of strongest preference was relevance of information for continued patient care. Preference for type of discharge summary was not significantly influenced by time in practice, type of practice, preference to read or scan summaries, or frequency of computer use.

Conclusion: Primary care physicians prefer computed-generated discharge summaries to dictated discharge summaries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信