[注册和记录系统中的荷兰护理概念框架]。

Verpleegkunde Pub Date : 1994-02-01
H Ten Napel, H J van der Bruggen
{"title":"[注册和记录系统中的荷兰护理概念框架]。","authors":"H Ten Napel,&nbsp;H J van der Bruggen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports on the results and method used in a literature review which was performed as a partial study in the Dutch National Pilot Research in Nursing Terminology. In this study literature stands for documents which are being used in nursing practice. The analysis of these documents points out that the Dutch practical nursing terminology is very heterogeneous. Concepts related to nursing diagnosis and nursing problems are used in many different ways. The arrangement of nursing terminology in general and of nursing diagnosis or nursing problems in particular, shows many dissimilarities. Indications for known classifications are small in number. There is a prodigious conceptual confusion. Community health care and mental health care show interesting efforts concerning classification, acute hospital care however only in a limited way. Community health care seems more advanced in establishing and systematizing nursing data. The results of this literature research indicate a large similarity with the results gathered at the other parts of the National Pilot Research in Nursing Terminology. The credibility of the results of this literature study is considered very high.</p>","PeriodicalId":79427,"journal":{"name":"Verpleegkunde","volume":"8 4","pages":"223-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The Dutch nursing concepts framework in registration and record systems].\",\"authors\":\"H Ten Napel,&nbsp;H J van der Bruggen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article reports on the results and method used in a literature review which was performed as a partial study in the Dutch National Pilot Research in Nursing Terminology. In this study literature stands for documents which are being used in nursing practice. The analysis of these documents points out that the Dutch practical nursing terminology is very heterogeneous. Concepts related to nursing diagnosis and nursing problems are used in many different ways. The arrangement of nursing terminology in general and of nursing diagnosis or nursing problems in particular, shows many dissimilarities. Indications for known classifications are small in number. There is a prodigious conceptual confusion. Community health care and mental health care show interesting efforts concerning classification, acute hospital care however only in a limited way. Community health care seems more advanced in establishing and systematizing nursing data. The results of this literature research indicate a large similarity with the results gathered at the other parts of the National Pilot Research in Nursing Terminology. The credibility of the results of this literature study is considered very high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Verpleegkunde\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"223-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Verpleegkunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verpleegkunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章报告的结果和方法使用的文献综述,这是在护理术语荷兰国家试点研究进行了部分研究。在本研究中,文献代表在护理实践中使用的文件。对这些文献的分析指出,荷兰实用护理术语是非常异质的。与护理诊断和护理问题相关的概念以许多不同的方式使用。一般护理术语和护理诊断或护理问题的安排,显示出许多不同之处。已知分类的适应症数量很少。存在着巨大的概念混乱。社区卫生保健和精神卫生保健在分类、急症医院护理方面做出了有趣的努力,但成效有限。社区卫生保健在建立和系统化护理数据方面似乎更先进。本文献研究的结果表明,在护理术语国家试点研究的其他部分收集的结果有很大的相似性。本文献研究结果的可信度被认为是很高的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[The Dutch nursing concepts framework in registration and record systems].

This article reports on the results and method used in a literature review which was performed as a partial study in the Dutch National Pilot Research in Nursing Terminology. In this study literature stands for documents which are being used in nursing practice. The analysis of these documents points out that the Dutch practical nursing terminology is very heterogeneous. Concepts related to nursing diagnosis and nursing problems are used in many different ways. The arrangement of nursing terminology in general and of nursing diagnosis or nursing problems in particular, shows many dissimilarities. Indications for known classifications are small in number. There is a prodigious conceptual confusion. Community health care and mental health care show interesting efforts concerning classification, acute hospital care however only in a limited way. Community health care seems more advanced in establishing and systematizing nursing data. The results of this literature research indicate a large similarity with the results gathered at the other parts of the National Pilot Research in Nursing Terminology. The credibility of the results of this literature study is considered very high.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信