预测抗心律失常药物的疗效。

J W Mason
{"title":"预测抗心律失常药物的疗效。","authors":"J W Mason","doi":"10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For years, electrophysiologic testing was regarded as the best way to select effective pharmacologic therapy. But now it appears that Holter monitoring is just as accurate--as well as simpler, safer, and cheaper. Nevertheless, most patients eventually will need an electrophysiologic study because of the high rate of arrhythmia recurrence.</p>","PeriodicalId":77164,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (Office ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting antiarrhythmic drug efficacy.\",\"authors\":\"J W Mason\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>For years, electrophysiologic testing was regarded as the best way to select effective pharmacologic therapy. But now it appears that Holter monitoring is just as accurate--as well as simpler, safer, and cheaper. Nevertheless, most patients eventually will need an electrophysiologic study because of the high rate of arrhythmia recurrence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice (Office ed.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice (Office ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (Office ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.1994.11443069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多年来,电生理试验被认为是选择有效药物治疗的最佳方法。但现在看来,动态心电图监测同样准确——而且更简单、更安全、更便宜。然而,由于心律失常复发率高,大多数患者最终需要电生理检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting antiarrhythmic drug efficacy.

For years, electrophysiologic testing was regarded as the best way to select effective pharmacologic therapy. But now it appears that Holter monitoring is just as accurate--as well as simpler, safer, and cheaper. Nevertheless, most patients eventually will need an electrophysiologic study because of the high rate of arrhythmia recurrence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信