[医生的责任]。

Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik Pub Date : 1993-01-01
F J Illhardt, M Redecker
{"title":"[医生的责任]。","authors":"F J Illhardt,&nbsp;M Redecker","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The more difficult it is to reach consensus as to the ethical framework for action, the greater the challenge to individuals to take the responsibility for the consequences of their actions and to be accountable to others and themselves. First and foremost, both responsibility and accountability imply providing answers to those who question the reasons for an action. Thus, responsibility presupposes that agents must know that their actions will have consequences, that these consequences must be intended, and furthermore, they must be justified as consequences which are known and intended. With reference to a case study, this paper discusses these points on four levels: 1) the medical standards, 2) the integration of the patient's intention and sense of well-being, 3) the institutional framework for action, and 4) the assessment of the action in its relation to the universal question whether it is good for all human beings.</p>","PeriodicalId":77110,"journal":{"name":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","volume":" 11-12","pages":"LXV-LXVII"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Responsibility of the physician].\",\"authors\":\"F J Illhardt,&nbsp;M Redecker\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The more difficult it is to reach consensus as to the ethical framework for action, the greater the challenge to individuals to take the responsibility for the consequences of their actions and to be accountable to others and themselves. First and foremost, both responsibility and accountability imply providing answers to those who question the reasons for an action. Thus, responsibility presupposes that agents must know that their actions will have consequences, that these consequences must be intended, and furthermore, they must be justified as consequences which are known and intended. With reference to a case study, this paper discusses these points on four levels: 1) the medical standards, 2) the integration of the patient's intention and sense of well-being, 3) the institutional framework for action, and 4) the assessment of the action in its relation to the universal question whether it is good for all human beings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"volume\":\" 11-12\",\"pages\":\"LXV-LXVII\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diskussionsforum medizinische Ethik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

就行动的道德框架达成协商一致意见越困难,个人对其行动的后果承担责任并对他人和自己负责的挑战就越大。首先也是最重要的是,责任和问责都意味着为那些质疑行为原因的人提供答案。因此,责任的前提是行为人必须知道他们的行为会产生后果,这些后果必须是有意的,而且,它们必须被证明是已知和有意的后果。本文以个案研究为例,从四个层面讨论这些要点:1)医疗标准;2)患者意愿和幸福感的整合;3)行动的制度框架;4)行动与是否对全人类有益的普遍问题的关系的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Responsibility of the physician].

The more difficult it is to reach consensus as to the ethical framework for action, the greater the challenge to individuals to take the responsibility for the consequences of their actions and to be accountable to others and themselves. First and foremost, both responsibility and accountability imply providing answers to those who question the reasons for an action. Thus, responsibility presupposes that agents must know that their actions will have consequences, that these consequences must be intended, and furthermore, they must be justified as consequences which are known and intended. With reference to a case study, this paper discusses these points on four levels: 1) the medical standards, 2) the integration of the patient's intention and sense of well-being, 3) the institutional framework for action, and 4) the assessment of the action in its relation to the universal question whether it is good for all human beings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信