精神卫生界在医疗改革辩论中的经验反思。

L J Scallet, J T Havel
{"title":"精神卫生界在医疗改革辩论中的经验反思。","authors":"L J Scallet,&nbsp;J T Havel","doi":"10.1176/ps.45.9.888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The creation of an effective coalition of mental health organizations was integral to the mental health community's early success in furthering coverage for mental health services in national health care reform. A unified coalition was able to establish political credibility and clarify substantive choices while the Task Force on National Health Care Reform was formulating the Clinton Administration's proposal, leading to initial indications that parity for mental health benefits and flexible coverage of a wide range of services would be included. As concerns about the cost of the benefit package increased, the Administration stepped back from including comprehensive coverage, and some organizations in the coalition became divided over specific provisions. However, as of June 1994, the mental health community's consistent consensus about the need for comprehensive coverage and parity enabled the field to gain inclusion for mental health services and, in fact, wider coverage in some of the proposals emerging from Congressional subcommittees.</p>","PeriodicalId":75910,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & community psychiatry","volume":"45 9","pages":"888-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.9.888","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflections on the mental health community's experience in the health care reform debate.\",\"authors\":\"L J Scallet,&nbsp;J T Havel\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/ps.45.9.888\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The creation of an effective coalition of mental health organizations was integral to the mental health community's early success in furthering coverage for mental health services in national health care reform. A unified coalition was able to establish political credibility and clarify substantive choices while the Task Force on National Health Care Reform was formulating the Clinton Administration's proposal, leading to initial indications that parity for mental health benefits and flexible coverage of a wide range of services would be included. As concerns about the cost of the benefit package increased, the Administration stepped back from including comprehensive coverage, and some organizations in the coalition became divided over specific provisions. However, as of June 1994, the mental health community's consistent consensus about the need for comprehensive coverage and parity enabled the field to gain inclusion for mental health services and, in fact, wider coverage in some of the proposals emerging from Congressional subcommittees.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital & community psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"45 9\",\"pages\":\"888-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1176/ps.45.9.888\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital & community psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.9.888\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital & community psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.45.9.888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

建立一个有效的精神卫生组织联盟是精神卫生界在国家保健改革中进一步扩大精神卫生服务覆盖面方面取得早期成功的组成部分。在国家保健改革工作队制定克林顿政府的建议时,一个统一的联盟能够建立政治信誉并澄清实质性选择,初步迹象表明,精神健康福利的平等和广泛服务的灵活覆盖范围将包括在内。由于对福利计划成本的担忧增加,政府放弃了全面覆盖,联盟中的一些组织在具体条款上出现了分歧。然而,截至1994年6月,精神卫生界对需要全面覆盖和平等的一致共识使该领域能够纳入精神卫生服务,事实上,在国会小组委员会提出的一些建议中,涵盖范围更广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflections on the mental health community's experience in the health care reform debate.

The creation of an effective coalition of mental health organizations was integral to the mental health community's early success in furthering coverage for mental health services in national health care reform. A unified coalition was able to establish political credibility and clarify substantive choices while the Task Force on National Health Care Reform was formulating the Clinton Administration's proposal, leading to initial indications that parity for mental health benefits and flexible coverage of a wide range of services would be included. As concerns about the cost of the benefit package increased, the Administration stepped back from including comprehensive coverage, and some organizations in the coalition became divided over specific provisions. However, as of June 1994, the mental health community's consistent consensus about the need for comprehensive coverage and parity enabled the field to gain inclusion for mental health services and, in fact, wider coverage in some of the proposals emerging from Congressional subcommittees.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信