父母对法国图尔儿童生物医学研究的看法。

E Autret, J P Dutertre, P Barbier, A P Jonville, F Pierre, C Berger
{"title":"父母对法国图尔儿童生物医学研究的看法。","authors":"E Autret,&nbsp;J P Dutertre,&nbsp;P Barbier,&nbsp;A P Jonville,&nbsp;F Pierre,&nbsp;C Berger","doi":"10.1159/000457542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to evaluate parental awareness of the law governing clinical trials in France (Loi Huriet), a study was performed by questionnaire between February and April 1991 in a maternity unit during the days following delivery. The response rate was 59%. 59% of the parents (319/541) were informed of the existence of the law by the media (75%) or their general practitioners (12%). Twenty-one percent (116/541) of the parents would accept the participation of their children in a clinical trial and 74% would refuse. The principal reasons for acceptance were: for the benefit of other children, contribution to medical progress and confidence in physicians. The reasons for refusal were: risk of side effects and unproven efficacy. Parents who would accept had more often received higher education (44%) than parents who would refuse (30%), the latter being less influenced by the explanations of physicians and less willing to accept that a physician should decide for them. Physicians should consider transmitting information directly to parents and indirectly via the media.</p>","PeriodicalId":11160,"journal":{"name":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000457542","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental opinions about biomedical research in children in Tours, France.\",\"authors\":\"E Autret,&nbsp;J P Dutertre,&nbsp;P Barbier,&nbsp;A P Jonville,&nbsp;F Pierre,&nbsp;C Berger\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000457542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In order to evaluate parental awareness of the law governing clinical trials in France (Loi Huriet), a study was performed by questionnaire between February and April 1991 in a maternity unit during the days following delivery. The response rate was 59%. 59% of the parents (319/541) were informed of the existence of the law by the media (75%) or their general practitioners (12%). Twenty-one percent (116/541) of the parents would accept the participation of their children in a clinical trial and 74% would refuse. The principal reasons for acceptance were: for the benefit of other children, contribution to medical progress and confidence in physicians. The reasons for refusal were: risk of side effects and unproven efficacy. Parents who would accept had more often received higher education (44%) than parents who would refuse (30%), the latter being less influenced by the explanations of physicians and less willing to accept that a physician should decide for them. Physicians should consider transmitting information directly to parents and indirectly via the media.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000457542\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000457542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000457542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

为了评价父母对法国临床试验法律的认识,1991年2月至4月期间,在分娩后的几天内在一家产科病房进行了问卷调查。应答率为59%。59%的父母(319/541)通过媒体(75%)或他们的全科医生(12%)得知了法律的存在。21%(116/541)的父母会接受他们的孩子参加临床试验,74%的父母会拒绝。接受的主要原因是:为了其他儿童的利益、对医学进步的贡献和对医生的信任。拒绝的原因是:副作用的风险和未证实的疗效。接受治疗的父母(44%)比拒绝治疗的父母(30%)受教育程度更高,后者不太受医生解释的影响,也不太愿意接受医生应该为他们做决定。医生应考虑直接向家长或通过媒体间接传递信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Parental opinions about biomedical research in children in Tours, France.

In order to evaluate parental awareness of the law governing clinical trials in France (Loi Huriet), a study was performed by questionnaire between February and April 1991 in a maternity unit during the days following delivery. The response rate was 59%. 59% of the parents (319/541) were informed of the existence of the law by the media (75%) or their general practitioners (12%). Twenty-one percent (116/541) of the parents would accept the participation of their children in a clinical trial and 74% would refuse. The principal reasons for acceptance were: for the benefit of other children, contribution to medical progress and confidence in physicians. The reasons for refusal were: risk of side effects and unproven efficacy. Parents who would accept had more often received higher education (44%) than parents who would refuse (30%), the latter being less influenced by the explanations of physicians and less willing to accept that a physician should decide for them. Physicians should consider transmitting information directly to parents and indirectly via the media.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信