吖伐他汀和特非那定对皮肤组胺反应性的影响。

Annals of allergy Pub Date : 1994-06-01
F Leynadier, M Murrieta, J Dry, J N Colin, C Gillotin, D Steru
{"title":"吖伐他汀和特非那定对皮肤组胺反应性的影响。","authors":"F Leynadier,&nbsp;M Murrieta,&nbsp;J Dry,&nbsp;J N Colin,&nbsp;C Gillotin,&nbsp;D Steru","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The response to the histamine hydrochloride prick skin test was studied in 24 healthy volunteers who received, in random order and at least four days apart, acrivastine (8 mg), terfenadine (120 mg), and placebo. The tests were performed on either side of the back before and at the time of administration (single dose), then every 30 minutes for two hours, and every hour for the following four hours. Evaluation was based on the mean of two measurements of the surface area of the wheal-and-flare reaction accompanied by assessment of topical pruritus. The response to histamine was decreased markedly in the two active treatment groups. Although within one hour of injection, the activity of both antihistamines was consistently greater than that of placebo, the kinetics of action of the two products nevertheless differed; indeed acrivastine was active against flare and wheal earlier (within 30 minutes); terfenadine proved to be more active than acrivastine only on flare and only at the later times (four, five, and six hours). The safety study primarily demonstrated drowsiness in one-fourth of the patients receiving placebo and active treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":7931,"journal":{"name":"Annals of allergy","volume":"72 6","pages":"520-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of acrivastine and terfenadine on skin reactivity to histamine.\",\"authors\":\"F Leynadier,&nbsp;M Murrieta,&nbsp;J Dry,&nbsp;J N Colin,&nbsp;C Gillotin,&nbsp;D Steru\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The response to the histamine hydrochloride prick skin test was studied in 24 healthy volunteers who received, in random order and at least four days apart, acrivastine (8 mg), terfenadine (120 mg), and placebo. The tests were performed on either side of the back before and at the time of administration (single dose), then every 30 minutes for two hours, and every hour for the following four hours. Evaluation was based on the mean of two measurements of the surface area of the wheal-and-flare reaction accompanied by assessment of topical pruritus. The response to histamine was decreased markedly in the two active treatment groups. Although within one hour of injection, the activity of both antihistamines was consistently greater than that of placebo, the kinetics of action of the two products nevertheless differed; indeed acrivastine was active against flare and wheal earlier (within 30 minutes); terfenadine proved to be more active than acrivastine only on flare and only at the later times (four, five, and six hours). The safety study primarily demonstrated drowsiness in one-fourth of the patients receiving placebo and active treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of allergy\",\"volume\":\"72 6\",\"pages\":\"520-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of allergy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了24名健康志愿者对盐酸组胺点刺皮肤试验的反应,这些志愿者随机接受吖啶伐汀(8mg)、特非那定(120mg)和安慰剂,间隔至少4天。在给药前和给药时(单次给药)对背部两侧进行测试,然后每30分钟进行一次,持续2小时,然后每小时进行一次,持续4小时。评估是基于两次测量的车轮和耀斑反应表面积的平均值,并伴有局部瘙痒的评估。两组积极治疗组对组胺的反应明显降低。尽管在注射后一小时内,两种抗组胺药的活性始终高于安慰剂,但两种产品的作用动力学却有所不同;的确,吖伐他汀对耀斑和轮状反应较早(30分钟内)有效;特非那定仅在耀斑和较晚的时间(4、5和6小时)比吖伐他汀更有效。安全性研究主要表明,接受安慰剂和积极治疗的患者中有四分之一出现嗜睡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of acrivastine and terfenadine on skin reactivity to histamine.

The response to the histamine hydrochloride prick skin test was studied in 24 healthy volunteers who received, in random order and at least four days apart, acrivastine (8 mg), terfenadine (120 mg), and placebo. The tests were performed on either side of the back before and at the time of administration (single dose), then every 30 minutes for two hours, and every hour for the following four hours. Evaluation was based on the mean of two measurements of the surface area of the wheal-and-flare reaction accompanied by assessment of topical pruritus. The response to histamine was decreased markedly in the two active treatment groups. Although within one hour of injection, the activity of both antihistamines was consistently greater than that of placebo, the kinetics of action of the two products nevertheless differed; indeed acrivastine was active against flare and wheal earlier (within 30 minutes); terfenadine proved to be more active than acrivastine only on flare and only at the later times (four, five, and six hours). The safety study primarily demonstrated drowsiness in one-fourth of the patients receiving placebo and active treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信