用牙周探针检测表面平滑度的评价。

G Atilla, S Kandemir
{"title":"用牙周探针检测表面平滑度的评价。","authors":"G Atilla,&nbsp;S Kandemir","doi":"10.2334/josnusd1959.36.261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An investigation was designed to determine whether or not the required smoothness has been reached. This is still a controversial subject among clinicians. Ten cylindrical metal samples of equal sizes with various degrees of smoothness were prepared, and their degrees of smoothness were assessed in a blind manner by 14 periodontists, who were asked to group them as smooth or rough using a periodontal probe. Along with the metal samples, the roughness of root surfaces smoothed in clinics was also evaluated using a Profilometer. The average value defined as a smooth surface on a max.-min. scale was 1.86 +/- 0.42, and values above 3.57 were considered to be rough. Consequently, decisions taken using the sense of touch about the smoothness of a surface were confirmed to be reliable for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22638,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry","volume":"36 4","pages":"261-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.261","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of surface smoothness detected by a periodontal probe.\",\"authors\":\"G Atilla,&nbsp;S Kandemir\",\"doi\":\"10.2334/josnusd1959.36.261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>An investigation was designed to determine whether or not the required smoothness has been reached. This is still a controversial subject among clinicians. Ten cylindrical metal samples of equal sizes with various degrees of smoothness were prepared, and their degrees of smoothness were assessed in a blind manner by 14 periodontists, who were asked to group them as smooth or rough using a periodontal probe. Along with the metal samples, the roughness of root surfaces smoothed in clinics was also evaluated using a Profilometer. The average value defined as a smooth surface on a max.-min. scale was 1.86 +/- 0.42, and values above 3.57 were considered to be rough. Consequently, decisions taken using the sense of touch about the smoothness of a surface were confirmed to be reliable for clinical use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"261-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.261\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nihon University School of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd1959.36.261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

设计了一项调查,以确定是否达到了要求的平滑度。这在临床医生中仍然是一个有争议的话题。准备10个大小相等、光滑度不同的圆柱形金属样品,由14名牙周病患者用牙周探针将其分为光滑和粗糙两组,以盲法评估其光滑度。与金属样品一起,还使用Profilometer评估了在诊所中光滑的根表面的粗糙度。定义为光滑表面上的最大值-最小值的平均值。量表为1.86 +/- 0.42,高于3.57被认为是粗糙的。因此,使用触觉对表面的平滑度作出的决定被证实是可靠的临床使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of surface smoothness detected by a periodontal probe.

An investigation was designed to determine whether or not the required smoothness has been reached. This is still a controversial subject among clinicians. Ten cylindrical metal samples of equal sizes with various degrees of smoothness were prepared, and their degrees of smoothness were assessed in a blind manner by 14 periodontists, who were asked to group them as smooth or rough using a periodontal probe. Along with the metal samples, the roughness of root surfaces smoothed in clinics was also evaluated using a Profilometer. The average value defined as a smooth surface on a max.-min. scale was 1.86 +/- 0.42, and values above 3.57 were considered to be rough. Consequently, decisions taken using the sense of touch about the smoothness of a surface were confirmed to be reliable for clinical use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信