肌肉注射镇静的安全性、有效性和可接受性:900例牙科病例的评估。

D P Lu, G P Lu, J F Reed
{"title":"肌肉注射镇静的安全性、有效性和可接受性:900例牙科病例的评估。","authors":"D P Lu,&nbsp;G P Lu,&nbsp;J F Reed","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intramuscular (IM) sedation techniques remain the least used by clinicians, possibly because of their limited exposure in the undergraduate and graduate dental curricula. To assess the safety and efficacy of these techniques, the authors conducted a retrospective study of 900 dental cases. A total of 308 patients received ketamine, 356 received a meperidine/promethazine combination, and 236 received midazolam. Results revealed a high safety record, efficacy, and good evaluations from clinicians and patients, in addition to some advantages over other sedation techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":55234,"journal":{"name":"Compendium-Continuing Education for Veterinarians","volume":"15 11","pages":"1348, 1350, 1352 passim; quiz 1362"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety, efficacy, and acceptance of intramuscular sedation: assessment of 900 dental cases.\",\"authors\":\"D P Lu,&nbsp;G P Lu,&nbsp;J F Reed\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intramuscular (IM) sedation techniques remain the least used by clinicians, possibly because of their limited exposure in the undergraduate and graduate dental curricula. To assess the safety and efficacy of these techniques, the authors conducted a retrospective study of 900 dental cases. A total of 308 patients received ketamine, 356 received a meperidine/promethazine combination, and 236 received midazolam. Results revealed a high safety record, efficacy, and good evaluations from clinicians and patients, in addition to some advantages over other sedation techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Compendium-Continuing Education for Veterinarians\",\"volume\":\"15 11\",\"pages\":\"1348, 1350, 1352 passim; quiz 1362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Compendium-Continuing Education for Veterinarians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Compendium-Continuing Education for Veterinarians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌肉注射(IM)镇静技术仍然是临床医生使用最少的,可能是因为他们在本科和研究生牙科课程有限的曝光。为了评估这些技术的安全性和有效性,作者对900例牙科病例进行了回顾性研究。308例患者接受氯胺酮治疗,356例接受哌嗪/异丙嗪联合治疗,236例接受咪达唑仑治疗。结果显示,该方法具有较高的安全性、有效性和临床医生和患者的良好评价,并且与其他镇静技术相比具有一些优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety, efficacy, and acceptance of intramuscular sedation: assessment of 900 dental cases.

Intramuscular (IM) sedation techniques remain the least used by clinicians, possibly because of their limited exposure in the undergraduate and graduate dental curricula. To assess the safety and efficacy of these techniques, the authors conducted a retrospective study of 900 dental cases. A total of 308 patients received ketamine, 356 received a meperidine/promethazine combination, and 236 received midazolam. Results revealed a high safety record, efficacy, and good evaluations from clinicians and patients, in addition to some advantages over other sedation techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信