四环与三环抗抑郁药治疗轻度抑郁症的比较研究。

S Tudor, M Zaharia
{"title":"四环与三环抗抑郁药治疗轻度抑郁症的比较研究。","authors":"S Tudor,&nbsp;M Zaharia","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One hundred and twenty-nine cases with depression were submitted to a comparative therapeutic study, using a flexible treatment administration: mianserin 30-60 mg and imipramine 50-150 mg. The mean dosages were 43.6 mg of mianserin and 62 mg/day of imipramine. Twenty-nine patients were excluded from the study, the rest constituting 2 equal groups of 50 cases each. The study covered a period of 4 weeks. After this period, almost 40% of the cases were discharged due to their obvious improvement. The significant benefits of mianserin were evident in the 7th and in the 21st day of the study on HDRS for the total score and in the 7th day on HDRS for the anxiety-somatization score. The superiority of mianserin was also obvious due to the total score on Lipmann-Rickels' scale as well as for the general neurotic symptoms. No statistically significant differences between mianserin and imipramine for the antidepressive efficacy were observed by the end of the study. A greater number of secondary effects was noticed in the group treated with imipramine. It seems that mianserin was a better therapy for this category of psychic patients, especially for older cases, probably due to the anxiolytic influence and to a lower incidence of side-effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":77370,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of neurology and psychiatry = Revue roumaine de neurologie et psychiatrie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the treatment with tetracyclic and tricyclic antidepressants in patients with minor depressive disorders.\",\"authors\":\"S Tudor,&nbsp;M Zaharia\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One hundred and twenty-nine cases with depression were submitted to a comparative therapeutic study, using a flexible treatment administration: mianserin 30-60 mg and imipramine 50-150 mg. The mean dosages were 43.6 mg of mianserin and 62 mg/day of imipramine. Twenty-nine patients were excluded from the study, the rest constituting 2 equal groups of 50 cases each. The study covered a period of 4 weeks. After this period, almost 40% of the cases were discharged due to their obvious improvement. The significant benefits of mianserin were evident in the 7th and in the 21st day of the study on HDRS for the total score and in the 7th day on HDRS for the anxiety-somatization score. The superiority of mianserin was also obvious due to the total score on Lipmann-Rickels' scale as well as for the general neurotic symptoms. No statistically significant differences between mianserin and imipramine for the antidepressive efficacy were observed by the end of the study. A greater number of secondary effects was noticed in the group treated with imipramine. It seems that mianserin was a better therapy for this category of psychic patients, especially for older cases, probably due to the anxiolytic influence and to a lower incidence of side-effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of neurology and psychiatry = Revue roumaine de neurologie et psychiatrie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of neurology and psychiatry = Revue roumaine de neurologie et psychiatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of neurology and psychiatry = Revue roumaine de neurologie et psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

129例抑郁症患者提交了一项比较治疗研究,使用灵活的治疗管理:米安色林30-60毫克和丙咪嗪50-150毫克。平均剂量为米安色林43.6 mg/天,丙咪嗪62 mg/天。29例患者被排除在研究之外,其余患者分为两组,每组50例。这项研究为期4周。经过这段时间,近40%的病例因病情明显好转而出院。在研究的第7天和第21天的HDRS总分和第7天的HDRS焦虑-躯体化评分中,米安色林的显著益处是明显的。米安色林在lipmann - ricels量表上的总分以及在一般神经症症状上的优势也很明显。研究结束时,米安色林与丙咪嗪的抗抑郁疗效无统计学差异。用丙咪嗪治疗组出现了更多的副作用。米安色林似乎是这类精神病患者更好的治疗方法,特别是对于老年患者,可能是由于其抗焦虑作用和副作用发生率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of the treatment with tetracyclic and tricyclic antidepressants in patients with minor depressive disorders.

One hundred and twenty-nine cases with depression were submitted to a comparative therapeutic study, using a flexible treatment administration: mianserin 30-60 mg and imipramine 50-150 mg. The mean dosages were 43.6 mg of mianserin and 62 mg/day of imipramine. Twenty-nine patients were excluded from the study, the rest constituting 2 equal groups of 50 cases each. The study covered a period of 4 weeks. After this period, almost 40% of the cases were discharged due to their obvious improvement. The significant benefits of mianserin were evident in the 7th and in the 21st day of the study on HDRS for the total score and in the 7th day on HDRS for the anxiety-somatization score. The superiority of mianserin was also obvious due to the total score on Lipmann-Rickels' scale as well as for the general neurotic symptoms. No statistically significant differences between mianserin and imipramine for the antidepressive efficacy were observed by the end of the study. A greater number of secondary effects was noticed in the group treated with imipramine. It seems that mianserin was a better therapy for this category of psychic patients, especially for older cases, probably due to the anxiolytic influence and to a lower incidence of side-effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信