鸡胚毒性筛选试验(CHEST)的验证。比较研究。

R Jelínek, O Marhan
{"title":"鸡胚毒性筛选试验(CHEST)的验证。比较研究。","authors":"R Jelínek,&nbsp;O Marhan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the aim of investigating the predictive value of the Chick Embryotoxicity Screening Test (CHEST) with respect to regulatory rat-rabbit procedures, we compared the results of testing 50 chemicals of different pharmacological properties. Besides all being tested in the alternative technique, 27 substances were tested both in rats and rabbits, 22 only in the rat, and one only in the rabbit, respectively. The predictive value of CHEST with respect to the both official whole-animal procedures was found satisfactory, exhibiting about 80% consistent results. It is argued that the purpose of alternative testing methods is not in replacing the official routine procedures, but in contributing to the development of new predictive systems based on recent teratological knowledge.</p>","PeriodicalId":12562,"journal":{"name":"Functional and developmental morphology","volume":"4 4","pages":"317-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the Chick Embryotoxicity Screening Test (CHEST). A comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"R Jelínek,&nbsp;O Marhan\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>With the aim of investigating the predictive value of the Chick Embryotoxicity Screening Test (CHEST) with respect to regulatory rat-rabbit procedures, we compared the results of testing 50 chemicals of different pharmacological properties. Besides all being tested in the alternative technique, 27 substances were tested both in rats and rabbits, 22 only in the rat, and one only in the rabbit, respectively. The predictive value of CHEST with respect to the both official whole-animal procedures was found satisfactory, exhibiting about 80% consistent results. It is argued that the purpose of alternative testing methods is not in replacing the official routine procedures, but in contributing to the development of new predictive systems based on recent teratological knowledge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functional and developmental morphology\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"317-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functional and developmental morphology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functional and developmental morphology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了探讨鸡胚毒性筛选试验(CHEST)在大鼠-兔试验中的预测价值,我们比较了50种不同药理性质的化学物质的测试结果。除了所有的替代技术测试外,27种物质在大鼠和兔子身上都测试了,22种只在大鼠身上测试,一种只在兔子身上测试。胸部对两种官方全动物手术的预测价值令人满意,显示出约80%的一致性结果。本文认为,替代检测方法的目的不在于取代官方的常规程序,而在于促进基于最新致畸学知识的新预测系统的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of the Chick Embryotoxicity Screening Test (CHEST). A comparative study.

With the aim of investigating the predictive value of the Chick Embryotoxicity Screening Test (CHEST) with respect to regulatory rat-rabbit procedures, we compared the results of testing 50 chemicals of different pharmacological properties. Besides all being tested in the alternative technique, 27 substances were tested both in rats and rabbits, 22 only in the rat, and one only in the rabbit, respectively. The predictive value of CHEST with respect to the both official whole-animal procedures was found satisfactory, exhibiting about 80% consistent results. It is argued that the purpose of alternative testing methods is not in replacing the official routine procedures, but in contributing to the development of new predictive systems based on recent teratological knowledge.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信