环境是健康教育/促进政策、计划和研究的重要维度。

P D Mullen, D Evans, J Forster, N H Gottlieb, M Kreuter, R Moon, T O'Rourke, V J Strecher
{"title":"环境是健康教育/促进政策、计划和研究的重要维度。","authors":"P D Mullen,&nbsp;D Evans,&nbsp;J Forster,&nbsp;N H Gottlieb,&nbsp;M Kreuter,&nbsp;R Moon,&nbsp;T O'Rourke,&nbsp;V J Strecher","doi":"10.1177/109019819402200306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Settings--community, worksite, schools, and healthcare sites--constitute an important dimension of health education/health promotion policy and programs and for research about program needs, feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness. These settings vary in the extent of coverage of and relationships with their respective constituencies, valued outcomes, and quantity and quality of evidence about the effectiveness of setting-specific and cross-setting programs. Main sources of evidence for program efficacy and effectiveness are summarized, leading to the conclusion that strides have been made toward building a strong evidentiary base for health education/health promotion in these settings. Gaps in research exist, especially for diffusion of effective programs, new technologies, the influence of policy, relations between settings, and approaches to marginal and special subgroups. Recommendations are offered for cross-setting and within-setting research related to intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":77155,"journal":{"name":"Health education quarterly","volume":"22 3","pages":"329-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/109019819402200306","citationCount":"113","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Settings as an important dimension in health education/promotion policy, programs, and research.\",\"authors\":\"P D Mullen,&nbsp;D Evans,&nbsp;J Forster,&nbsp;N H Gottlieb,&nbsp;M Kreuter,&nbsp;R Moon,&nbsp;T O'Rourke,&nbsp;V J Strecher\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/109019819402200306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Settings--community, worksite, schools, and healthcare sites--constitute an important dimension of health education/health promotion policy and programs and for research about program needs, feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness. These settings vary in the extent of coverage of and relationships with their respective constituencies, valued outcomes, and quantity and quality of evidence about the effectiveness of setting-specific and cross-setting programs. Main sources of evidence for program efficacy and effectiveness are summarized, leading to the conclusion that strides have been made toward building a strong evidentiary base for health education/health promotion in these settings. Gaps in research exist, especially for diffusion of effective programs, new technologies, the influence of policy, relations between settings, and approaches to marginal and special subgroups. Recommendations are offered for cross-setting and within-setting research related to intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77155,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health education quarterly\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"329-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/109019819402200306\",\"citationCount\":\"113\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health education quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402200306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health education quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402200306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 113

摘要

环境——社区、工作场所、学校和医疗场所——构成健康教育/健康促进政策和项目的重要维度,也是项目需求、可行性、有效性和有效性研究的重要维度。这些环境在覆盖范围和与各自选区的关系、所看重的结果以及特定环境和跨环境规划有效性证据的数量和质量方面各不相同。总结了项目有效性和有效性的主要证据来源,得出结论,在这些环境中为健康教育/健康促进建立强有力的证据基础方面取得了进展。研究中存在差距,特别是在有效方案的传播、新技术、政策的影响、环境之间的关系以及针对边缘和特殊亚群体的方法方面。对与干预相关的跨情境和情境内研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Settings as an important dimension in health education/promotion policy, programs, and research.

Settings--community, worksite, schools, and healthcare sites--constitute an important dimension of health education/health promotion policy and programs and for research about program needs, feasibility, efficacy, and effectiveness. These settings vary in the extent of coverage of and relationships with their respective constituencies, valued outcomes, and quantity and quality of evidence about the effectiveness of setting-specific and cross-setting programs. Main sources of evidence for program efficacy and effectiveness are summarized, leading to the conclusion that strides have been made toward building a strong evidentiary base for health education/health promotion in these settings. Gaps in research exist, especially for diffusion of effective programs, new technologies, the influence of policy, relations between settings, and approaches to marginal and special subgroups. Recommendations are offered for cross-setting and within-setting research related to intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信