[关于老年人科学研究的建议]。

Gerontologie Pub Date : 1981-05-01
W J Goedhard, J Hellemans, E H van Kammen-Wijnmalen, J M Munnichs, T A Vis
{"title":"[关于老年人科学研究的建议]。","authors":"W J Goedhard,&nbsp;J Hellemans,&nbsp;E H van Kammen-Wijnmalen,&nbsp;J M Munnichs,&nbsp;T A Vis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A few years ago, the Ministry of Culture, Recreation and Social Welfare inaugurated a Planning group to establish a scientific program for research on ageing. This contribution gives comment on this advice just published. In general the program will only be used to a certain extent. The planning group advises to inaugurate another steering committee, that should control the research itself and its evaluation. The commentators hope that this steering committee will be enabled to apply the program in a fairly independent way. Why: because the advice lacks a strong structure. It is clear that the gerontological field is such a vast area, that it is impossible to do research on all topics. Therefore, we need some more clear alternatives to choose between. The commentators stress three different alternatives: 1. the fundamental research in bio-medical as well as in behavioural sciences; 2. the major practical problems of ageing people and their support; 3. accent on development of methods and measures. The comment emphasizes also the conditions for research-education at university level and the stimulation of grants for developing new research projects. In addition, some remarks are made about the composition of the planning group. Unfortunately, in that group the medical practitioner and the psychologist were missing.</p>","PeriodicalId":79220,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologie","volume":"12 2","pages":"63-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Advice on scientific research on the aged person].\",\"authors\":\"W J Goedhard,&nbsp;J Hellemans,&nbsp;E H van Kammen-Wijnmalen,&nbsp;J M Munnichs,&nbsp;T A Vis\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A few years ago, the Ministry of Culture, Recreation and Social Welfare inaugurated a Planning group to establish a scientific program for research on ageing. This contribution gives comment on this advice just published. In general the program will only be used to a certain extent. The planning group advises to inaugurate another steering committee, that should control the research itself and its evaluation. The commentators hope that this steering committee will be enabled to apply the program in a fairly independent way. Why: because the advice lacks a strong structure. It is clear that the gerontological field is such a vast area, that it is impossible to do research on all topics. Therefore, we need some more clear alternatives to choose between. The commentators stress three different alternatives: 1. the fundamental research in bio-medical as well as in behavioural sciences; 2. the major practical problems of ageing people and their support; 3. accent on development of methods and measures. The comment emphasizes also the conditions for research-education at university level and the stimulation of grants for developing new research projects. In addition, some remarks are made about the composition of the planning group. Unfortunately, in that group the medical practitioner and the psychologist were missing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":79220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologie\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"63-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几年前,文化、娱乐和社会福利部成立了一个计划小组,以建立一个研究老龄化的科学计划。这篇文章对刚刚发表的建议进行了评论。一般来说,这个程序只会在一定程度上使用。计划小组建议成立另一个指导委员会,控制研究本身及其评估。评论员们希望这个指导委员会能够以一种相当独立的方式应用该计划。原因:因为这个建议缺乏一个强有力的结构。很明显,老年学领域是一个如此广阔的领域,不可能对所有主题进行研究。因此,我们需要一些更明确的选择。评论员们强调了三种不同的选择:生物医学和行为科学的基础研究;2. 老年人的主要实际问题及其赡养;3.注重方法和措施的发展。该评论还强调了大学研究教育的条件和鼓励为发展新的研究项目提供资助。此外,还对规划小组的组成作了一些评论。不幸的是,在这个群体中,医生和心理学家都不见了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Advice on scientific research on the aged person].

A few years ago, the Ministry of Culture, Recreation and Social Welfare inaugurated a Planning group to establish a scientific program for research on ageing. This contribution gives comment on this advice just published. In general the program will only be used to a certain extent. The planning group advises to inaugurate another steering committee, that should control the research itself and its evaluation. The commentators hope that this steering committee will be enabled to apply the program in a fairly independent way. Why: because the advice lacks a strong structure. It is clear that the gerontological field is such a vast area, that it is impossible to do research on all topics. Therefore, we need some more clear alternatives to choose between. The commentators stress three different alternatives: 1. the fundamental research in bio-medical as well as in behavioural sciences; 2. the major practical problems of ageing people and their support; 3. accent on development of methods and measures. The comment emphasizes also the conditions for research-education at university level and the stimulation of grants for developing new research projects. In addition, some remarks are made about the composition of the planning group. Unfortunately, in that group the medical practitioner and the psychologist were missing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信