5个自共同祖先dd小鼠建立的近交系间的遗传关系,通过下颌骨分析进行了评估。

N Goto, K Miura, K Imamura, K Komeda
{"title":"5个自共同祖先dd小鼠建立的近交系间的遗传关系,通过下颌骨分析进行了评估。","authors":"N Goto,&nbsp;K Miura,&nbsp;K Imamura,&nbsp;K Komeda","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>By multivariate analysis using mandible measurements genetic relationships were investigated among 5 inbred strains, DDD, DDK, DSD, DD/Tbr and DDY, derived from the common ancestor, dd mouse. (1) In canonical discriminant analysis (discriminant analysis with reduction of dimensionality), 3 DD strains, DDD, DSD, and DDY, were closer to one another than to any control strain on planes Z1-Z2, Z1-Z3, and Z2-Z3. Only the DDK strain was quite far from those 3 strains. (2) In the discriminant analysis, however, the 5 inbred strains could be classified correctly at the rate of 100%. They were genetically different from one another. (3) The causes for this genetical difference seemed to be the genetic heterogeneity of the ancestor dd mouse and the method of inbreeding which had been independent since the separation.</p>","PeriodicalId":76197,"journal":{"name":"National Institute of Animal Health quarterly","volume":"22 2","pages":"70-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic relationships among 5 inbred strains established from common ancestor, dd mouse, as assessed by mandible analysis.\",\"authors\":\"N Goto,&nbsp;K Miura,&nbsp;K Imamura,&nbsp;K Komeda\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>By multivariate analysis using mandible measurements genetic relationships were investigated among 5 inbred strains, DDD, DDK, DSD, DD/Tbr and DDY, derived from the common ancestor, dd mouse. (1) In canonical discriminant analysis (discriminant analysis with reduction of dimensionality), 3 DD strains, DDD, DSD, and DDY, were closer to one another than to any control strain on planes Z1-Z2, Z1-Z3, and Z2-Z3. Only the DDK strain was quite far from those 3 strains. (2) In the discriminant analysis, however, the 5 inbred strains could be classified correctly at the rate of 100%. They were genetically different from one another. (3) The causes for this genetical difference seemed to be the genetic heterogeneity of the ancestor dd mouse and the method of inbreeding which had been independent since the separation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"National Institute of Animal Health quarterly\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"70-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1982-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"National Institute of Animal Health quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Institute of Animal Health quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过下颌骨测量的多变量分析,研究了共同祖先DD小鼠的5个自交系DDD、DDK、DSD、DD/Tbr和DDY的遗传关系。(1)典型判别分析(降维判别分析)表明,DDD、DSD和DDY 3个DD菌株在Z1-Z2、Z1-Z3和Z2-Z3平面上与对照菌株的关系更接近。只有DDK株与这3株差异较大。(2)在判别分析中,5个自交系的分类正确率为100%。他们在基因上彼此不同。(3)造成这种遗传差异的原因可能是祖先dd小鼠的遗传异质性和自分离以来一直独立的近交方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetic relationships among 5 inbred strains established from common ancestor, dd mouse, as assessed by mandible analysis.

By multivariate analysis using mandible measurements genetic relationships were investigated among 5 inbred strains, DDD, DDK, DSD, DD/Tbr and DDY, derived from the common ancestor, dd mouse. (1) In canonical discriminant analysis (discriminant analysis with reduction of dimensionality), 3 DD strains, DDD, DSD, and DDY, were closer to one another than to any control strain on planes Z1-Z2, Z1-Z3, and Z2-Z3. Only the DDK strain was quite far from those 3 strains. (2) In the discriminant analysis, however, the 5 inbred strains could be classified correctly at the rate of 100%. They were genetically different from one another. (3) The causes for this genetical difference seemed to be the genetic heterogeneity of the ancestor dd mouse and the method of inbreeding which had been independent since the separation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信