Shirong Zhu , Kaibin Xie , Qiaoli Lin , Rui Cao , Feng Qiu
{"title":"高能表面表面能的实验测定综述","authors":"Shirong Zhu , Kaibin Xie , Qiaoli Lin , Rui Cao , Feng Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.cis.2023.102905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The experimental determination of surface free energy is of great importance for engineering applications. However, there is no universal, reliable, and convenient measurement means to achieve experimental determination of </span>solid surface energy for high-energy surface. In this work, the existing techniques for experimental determination of surface energy of solids, including indirect (4 kinds) and direct methods (3 kinds), were critically reviewed. In the indirect methods: the explicit interfacial bonding characteristics are required for the multiphase equilibrium technique and for the </span>determination method from crystal equilibrium shape; the critical surface energy technique does not satisfy Zisman's hypothesis that the solid-liquid interface tension is zero (or close to zero), and the parameters fitted by empirical equations cannot have definite physical meaning; the derivation based on the surface tension in the liquid state can only obtain the surface energy of the solid phase near the melting point, and is limited to the prediction of the surface energy of elemental metal. Among the direct determination methods, except for the zero-creep method, are based on generalized determination technologies. All determined results are strongly influenced by the accuracy of the particle (grain) size, scale effect, the atmosphere, etc. This leads to the fact that the errors are still huge regardless of the determination method used, and it is difficult to achieve uniformity of the data. All methods rely to some extent on specific assumptions or theoretical models.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":239,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science","volume":"315 ","pages":"Article 102905"},"PeriodicalIF":15.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental determination of surface energy for high-energy surface: A review\",\"authors\":\"Shirong Zhu , Kaibin Xie , Qiaoli Lin , Rui Cao , Feng Qiu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cis.2023.102905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The experimental determination of surface free energy is of great importance for engineering applications. However, there is no universal, reliable, and convenient measurement means to achieve experimental determination of </span>solid surface energy for high-energy surface. In this work, the existing techniques for experimental determination of surface energy of solids, including indirect (4 kinds) and direct methods (3 kinds), were critically reviewed. In the indirect methods: the explicit interfacial bonding characteristics are required for the multiphase equilibrium technique and for the </span>determination method from crystal equilibrium shape; the critical surface energy technique does not satisfy Zisman's hypothesis that the solid-liquid interface tension is zero (or close to zero), and the parameters fitted by empirical equations cannot have definite physical meaning; the derivation based on the surface tension in the liquid state can only obtain the surface energy of the solid phase near the melting point, and is limited to the prediction of the surface energy of elemental metal. Among the direct determination methods, except for the zero-creep method, are based on generalized determination technologies. All determined results are strongly influenced by the accuracy of the particle (grain) size, scale effect, the atmosphere, etc. This leads to the fact that the errors are still huge regardless of the determination method used, and it is difficult to achieve uniformity of the data. All methods rely to some extent on specific assumptions or theoretical models.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science\",\"volume\":\"315 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102905\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001868623000726\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001868623000726","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experimental determination of surface energy for high-energy surface: A review
The experimental determination of surface free energy is of great importance for engineering applications. However, there is no universal, reliable, and convenient measurement means to achieve experimental determination of solid surface energy for high-energy surface. In this work, the existing techniques for experimental determination of surface energy of solids, including indirect (4 kinds) and direct methods (3 kinds), were critically reviewed. In the indirect methods: the explicit interfacial bonding characteristics are required for the multiphase equilibrium technique and for the determination method from crystal equilibrium shape; the critical surface energy technique does not satisfy Zisman's hypothesis that the solid-liquid interface tension is zero (or close to zero), and the parameters fitted by empirical equations cannot have definite physical meaning; the derivation based on the surface tension in the liquid state can only obtain the surface energy of the solid phase near the melting point, and is limited to the prediction of the surface energy of elemental metal. Among the direct determination methods, except for the zero-creep method, are based on generalized determination technologies. All determined results are strongly influenced by the accuracy of the particle (grain) size, scale effect, the atmosphere, etc. This leads to the fact that the errors are still huge regardless of the determination method used, and it is difficult to achieve uniformity of the data. All methods rely to some extent on specific assumptions or theoretical models.
期刊介绍:
"Advances in Colloid and Interface Science" is an international journal that focuses on experimental and theoretical developments in interfacial and colloidal phenomena. The journal covers a wide range of disciplines including biology, chemistry, physics, and technology.
The journal accepts review articles on any topic within the scope of colloid and interface science. These articles should provide an in-depth analysis of the subject matter, offering a critical review of the current state of the field. The author's informed opinion on the topic should also be included. The manuscript should compare and contrast ideas found in the reviewed literature and address the limitations of these ideas.
Typically, the articles published in this journal are written by recognized experts in the field.