家庭或个人治疗:模式选择的决定因素。

F M Sander
{"title":"家庭或个人治疗:模式选择的决定因素。","authors":"F M Sander","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are powerful non-rational forces in patients and therapists alike, and in the therapeutic context. These forces often determine whether individual or family therapy is chosen. Historical, cultural, and economic forces, patient and family motivations, and therapist preferences are all powerful determinants of modality choice. This is partly due to the newness of the field of family therapy, and will probably continue until we have a better conceptual grasp of family theory and nosology, the interrelation of individual and family pathology, and a clearer delineation of the criteria for these modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":77808,"journal":{"name":"The Hillside journal of clinical psychiatry","volume":"7 1","pages":"63-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family or individual therapy: the determinants of modality choice.\",\"authors\":\"F M Sander\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are powerful non-rational forces in patients and therapists alike, and in the therapeutic context. These forces often determine whether individual or family therapy is chosen. Historical, cultural, and economic forces, patient and family motivations, and therapist preferences are all powerful determinants of modality choice. This is partly due to the newness of the field of family therapy, and will probably continue until we have a better conceptual grasp of family theory and nosology, the interrelation of individual and family pathology, and a clearer delineation of the criteria for these modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Hillside journal of clinical psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"63-70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1985-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Hillside journal of clinical psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hillside journal of clinical psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在病人和治疗师身上,以及在治疗环境中,都存在着强大的非理性力量。这些因素通常决定了是选择个人治疗还是家庭治疗。历史、文化和经济力量、患者和家庭动机以及治疗师的偏好都是影响治疗方式选择的重要因素。这部分是由于家庭治疗领域的新颖性,并且可能会继续下去,直到我们对家庭理论和分类学有更好的概念把握,个人和家庭病理的相互关系,以及对这些模式的标准有更清晰的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family or individual therapy: the determinants of modality choice.

There are powerful non-rational forces in patients and therapists alike, and in the therapeutic context. These forces often determine whether individual or family therapy is chosen. Historical, cultural, and economic forces, patient and family motivations, and therapist preferences are all powerful determinants of modality choice. This is partly due to the newness of the field of family therapy, and will probably continue until we have a better conceptual grasp of family theory and nosology, the interrelation of individual and family pathology, and a clearer delineation of the criteria for these modalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信