茶碱缓释“洒”形式与标准糖浆制剂在幼儿哮喘中的比较研究。

Pharmatherapeutica Pub Date : 1986-01-01
K P Dawson
{"title":"茶碱缓释“洒”形式与标准糖浆制剂在幼儿哮喘中的比较研究。","authors":"K P Dawson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sixty-one chronic asthmatic children received either a new slow-release sprinkle format of theophylline, twice daily, or theophylline liquid, 4-times per day. Over a study period of three months, there was no measurable difference in compliance or symptom control between the two groups. The sprinkle-treated patients, however, had a greater incidence of side-effects and had higher rates of nebulization with beta-agonists. Possible explanations are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19862,"journal":{"name":"Pharmatherapeutica","volume":"4 7","pages":"442-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of theophylline in a slow-release 'sprinkle' format with a standard syrup preparation in young children with asthma.\",\"authors\":\"K P Dawson\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Sixty-one chronic asthmatic children received either a new slow-release sprinkle format of theophylline, twice daily, or theophylline liquid, 4-times per day. Over a study period of three months, there was no measurable difference in compliance or symptom control between the two groups. The sprinkle-treated patients, however, had a greater incidence of side-effects and had higher rates of nebulization with beta-agonists. Possible explanations are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"volume\":\"4 7\",\"pages\":\"442-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pharmatherapeutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmatherapeutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

61名慢性哮喘患儿接受新的缓释茶碱滴注治疗,每日2次,或茶碱液体治疗,每日4次。在三个月的研究期间,两组在依从性或症状控制方面没有可测量的差异。然而,使用喷雾剂治疗的患者副作用发生率更高,使用β激动剂雾化的比例也更高。讨论了可能的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of theophylline in a slow-release 'sprinkle' format with a standard syrup preparation in young children with asthma.

Sixty-one chronic asthmatic children received either a new slow-release sprinkle format of theophylline, twice daily, or theophylline liquid, 4-times per day. Over a study period of three months, there was no measurable difference in compliance or symptom control between the two groups. The sprinkle-treated patients, however, had a greater incidence of side-effects and had higher rates of nebulization with beta-agonists. Possible explanations are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信