{"title":"在怀孕早期无意中进行了子宫输卵管造影。","authors":"P Justesen, F Rasmussen, P E Andersen","doi":"10.1177/028418518602700616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A review of 6,225 hysterosalpingographies disclosed four cases of inadvertently performed examinations during early pregnancy. These radiologic misadventures were in three cases performed because of oligomenorrhoea and in one case because of a misjudged decidual bleeding. The radiologic findings and the outcome of these pregnancies are presented. Precautions to avoid this radiographic error are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7142,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","volume":"27 6","pages":"711-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/028418518602700616","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inadvertently performed hysterosalpingography during early pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"P Justesen, F Rasmussen, P E Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/028418518602700616\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A review of 6,225 hysterosalpingographies disclosed four cases of inadvertently performed examinations during early pregnancy. These radiologic misadventures were in three cases performed because of oligomenorrhoea and in one case because of a misjudged decidual bleeding. The radiologic findings and the outcome of these pregnancies are presented. Precautions to avoid this radiographic error are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica: diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"711-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/028418518602700616\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica: diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700616\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica: diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518602700616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Inadvertently performed hysterosalpingography during early pregnancy.
A review of 6,225 hysterosalpingographies disclosed four cases of inadvertently performed examinations during early pregnancy. These radiologic misadventures were in three cases performed because of oligomenorrhoea and in one case because of a misjudged decidual bleeding. The radiologic findings and the outcome of these pregnancies are presented. Precautions to avoid this radiographic error are discussed.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
