用户对除颤器标准的看法。

Medical instrumentation Pub Date : 1986-11-01
M B Raber, F S Osman
{"title":"用户对除颤器标准的看法。","authors":"M B Raber,&nbsp;F S Osman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>User views on the need for defibrillator standards were surveyed as part of a multifaceted study of defibrillator use in Canadian hospitals. The majority of users favor standardization of performance, labeling, and use characteristics. They also prefer that all defibrillators incorporate cardioversion capability. Most users prefer that the defibrillator automatically switch to the emergency mode after delivery of a cardioversion shock, but almost one half of the physicians preferred the unit to remain in the synchronized mode as set. Most users are in favor of all equipment operating in the same fashion, but paramedics are not. Only a minority believes that cardioversion features are a cause of confusion, yet conversations with biomedical engineers indicate that this confusion is a common problem among the users. Virtually all users prefer that necessary standards for safety and efficacy should be mandatory for both manufacturers and hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":76133,"journal":{"name":"Medical instrumentation","volume":"20 6","pages":"316-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User views on standards for defibrillators.\",\"authors\":\"M B Raber,&nbsp;F S Osman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>User views on the need for defibrillator standards were surveyed as part of a multifaceted study of defibrillator use in Canadian hospitals. The majority of users favor standardization of performance, labeling, and use characteristics. They also prefer that all defibrillators incorporate cardioversion capability. Most users prefer that the defibrillator automatically switch to the emergency mode after delivery of a cardioversion shock, but almost one half of the physicians preferred the unit to remain in the synchronized mode as set. Most users are in favor of all equipment operating in the same fashion, but paramedics are not. Only a minority believes that cardioversion features are a cause of confusion, yet conversations with biomedical engineers indicate that this confusion is a common problem among the users. Virtually all users prefer that necessary standards for safety and efficacy should be mandatory for both manufacturers and hospitals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"316-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical instrumentation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为加拿大医院除颤器使用情况多方面研究的一部分,调查了用户对除颤器标准需求的看法。大多数用户赞成性能、标签和使用特性的标准化。他们还希望所有的除颤器都具有复律功能。大多数用户希望除颤器在发生心律转复休克后自动切换到紧急模式,但几乎一半的医生希望除颤器保持在设定的同步模式。大多数用户都赞成所有设备以相同的方式运行,但护理人员却不这样认为。只有少数人认为,心律转复功能是造成混乱的原因,然而与生物医学工程师的对话表明,这种混乱是用户中普遍存在的问题。几乎所有的使用者都倾向于对制造商和医院实行强制性的安全性和有效性标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User views on standards for defibrillators.

User views on the need for defibrillator standards were surveyed as part of a multifaceted study of defibrillator use in Canadian hospitals. The majority of users favor standardization of performance, labeling, and use characteristics. They also prefer that all defibrillators incorporate cardioversion capability. Most users prefer that the defibrillator automatically switch to the emergency mode after delivery of a cardioversion shock, but almost one half of the physicians preferred the unit to remain in the synchronized mode as set. Most users are in favor of all equipment operating in the same fashion, but paramedics are not. Only a minority believes that cardioversion features are a cause of confusion, yet conversations with biomedical engineers indicate that this confusion is a common problem among the users. Virtually all users prefer that necessary standards for safety and efficacy should be mandatory for both manufacturers and hospitals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信