{"title":"适应不良行为应该得到公平对待:这是对萨尔茨和克劳斯的回应。","authors":"C S Holburn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This response is a reaction to a study by Seltzer and Krauss (1984), in which dichotomous measurement of the behavior-problem variable gave rise to some potentially misleading implications about community-placement planning. Some difficulties in measuring this complex variable were reviewed and a more functional behavior assessment advocated. The problem of maladaptive behavior as an obstacle to deinstitutionalization has not yet been resolved.</p>","PeriodicalId":75475,"journal":{"name":"American journal of mental deficiency","volume":"91 3","pages":"211-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maladaptive behavior merits fair treatment: a response to Seltzer and Krauss.\",\"authors\":\"C S Holburn\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This response is a reaction to a study by Seltzer and Krauss (1984), in which dichotomous measurement of the behavior-problem variable gave rise to some potentially misleading implications about community-placement planning. Some difficulties in measuring this complex variable were reviewed and a more functional behavior assessment advocated. The problem of maladaptive behavior as an obstacle to deinstitutionalization has not yet been resolved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of mental deficiency\",\"volume\":\"91 3\",\"pages\":\"211-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of mental deficiency\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of mental deficiency","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Maladaptive behavior merits fair treatment: a response to Seltzer and Krauss.
This response is a reaction to a study by Seltzer and Krauss (1984), in which dichotomous measurement of the behavior-problem variable gave rise to some potentially misleading implications about community-placement planning. Some difficulties in measuring this complex variable were reviewed and a more functional behavior assessment advocated. The problem of maladaptive behavior as an obstacle to deinstitutionalization has not yet been resolved.