麻醉诱导时左心室射血分数:快速序贯与选择性诱导的比较。

B Chraemmer-Jørgensen, P F Høilund-Carlsen, J Marving, V Christensen
{"title":"麻醉诱导时左心室射血分数:快速序贯与选择性诱导的比较。","authors":"B Chraemmer-Jørgensen,&nbsp;P F Høilund-Carlsen,&nbsp;J Marving,&nbsp;V Christensen","doi":"10.1007/BF03027126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 14 women, aged 24-60 years, to compare the effects of rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia and elective induction on heart rate, blood pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). None of the patients suffered from heart or lung diseases, and all were scheduled for hysterectomy. Cuff blood pressure was measured repeatedly by an automatic recording device, and heart rate and LVEF were monitored by a portable nonimaging nuclear probe. In seven patients, a rapid-sequence induction was performed following preoxygenation and with simultaneous injection of thiopentone (5 mg X kg-1) and succinylcholine, without starting manual ventilation until the airway was secured with the endotracheal tube. In another seven patients, elective induction was carried out by sequential administration of the same drugs. Forty seconds after laryngoscopy and intubation mean blood pressure had increased by 38 per cent and heart rate by 29 per cent from preintubation values in the rapid sequence induction group, compared to 30 and 12 per cent respectively, in the elective induction group (p less than 0.05). Similar decreases in LVEF was observed in both groups, from 0.60 to 0.42 in the elective induction group, and from 0.60 to 0.41 in the rapid-sequence induction group. The equal depression of LVEF indicates that laryngoscopy and intubation produce, with both induction regimens, sudden impairment of cardiac function. The more pronounced hypertension and tachycardia observed during rapid-sequence induction suggests a higher myocardial oxygen consumption which may represent a serious additional burden for the poorly perfused heart.</p>","PeriodicalId":9371,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","volume":"33 6","pages":"754-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03027126","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left ventricular ejection fraction during anaesthetic induction: comparison of rapid-sequence and elective induction.\",\"authors\":\"B Chraemmer-Jørgensen,&nbsp;P F Høilund-Carlsen,&nbsp;J Marving,&nbsp;V Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF03027126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 14 women, aged 24-60 years, to compare the effects of rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia and elective induction on heart rate, blood pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). None of the patients suffered from heart or lung diseases, and all were scheduled for hysterectomy. Cuff blood pressure was measured repeatedly by an automatic recording device, and heart rate and LVEF were monitored by a portable nonimaging nuclear probe. In seven patients, a rapid-sequence induction was performed following preoxygenation and with simultaneous injection of thiopentone (5 mg X kg-1) and succinylcholine, without starting manual ventilation until the airway was secured with the endotracheal tube. In another seven patients, elective induction was carried out by sequential administration of the same drugs. Forty seconds after laryngoscopy and intubation mean blood pressure had increased by 38 per cent and heart rate by 29 per cent from preintubation values in the rapid sequence induction group, compared to 30 and 12 per cent respectively, in the elective induction group (p less than 0.05). Similar decreases in LVEF was observed in both groups, from 0.60 to 0.42 in the elective induction group, and from 0.60 to 0.41 in the rapid-sequence induction group. The equal depression of LVEF indicates that laryngoscopy and intubation produce, with both induction regimens, sudden impairment of cardiac function. The more pronounced hypertension and tachycardia observed during rapid-sequence induction suggests a higher myocardial oxygen consumption which may represent a serious additional burden for the poorly perfused heart.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal\",\"volume\":\"33 6\",\"pages\":\"754-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF03027126\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Anaesthetists' Society journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03027126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对14名24-60岁的女性进行随机临床试验,比较快速序贯麻醉诱导和择期诱导对心率、血压和左心室射血分数(LVEF)的影响。所有患者均无心脏或肺部疾病,均计划进行子宫切除术。用自动记录装置反复测量袖带血压,用便携式无成像核探针监测心率和LVEF。7例患者在预充氧后进行快速序贯诱导,同时注射硫喷妥酮(5mg X kg-1)和琥珀胆碱,未开始人工通气,直到气管内插管固定气道。在另外7例患者中,选择性诱导是通过顺序给药相同的药物进行的。在喉镜检查和插管40秒后,快速序列诱导组的血压比插管前升高38%,心率比插管前升高29%,而择期诱导组分别为30%和12% (p < 0.05)。在两组中观察到相似的LVEF下降,选择性诱导组从0.60降至0.42,快速序列诱导组从0.60降至0.41。LVEF的同样下降表明,在两种诱导方案下,喉镜检查和插管都会产生心功能的突然损害。在快速序列诱导过程中观察到的更明显的高血压和心动过速表明心肌耗氧量较高,这可能对灌注不良的心脏构成严重的额外负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Left ventricular ejection fraction during anaesthetic induction: comparison of rapid-sequence and elective induction.

A randomized clinical trial was conducted in 14 women, aged 24-60 years, to compare the effects of rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia and elective induction on heart rate, blood pressure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). None of the patients suffered from heart or lung diseases, and all were scheduled for hysterectomy. Cuff blood pressure was measured repeatedly by an automatic recording device, and heart rate and LVEF were monitored by a portable nonimaging nuclear probe. In seven patients, a rapid-sequence induction was performed following preoxygenation and with simultaneous injection of thiopentone (5 mg X kg-1) and succinylcholine, without starting manual ventilation until the airway was secured with the endotracheal tube. In another seven patients, elective induction was carried out by sequential administration of the same drugs. Forty seconds after laryngoscopy and intubation mean blood pressure had increased by 38 per cent and heart rate by 29 per cent from preintubation values in the rapid sequence induction group, compared to 30 and 12 per cent respectively, in the elective induction group (p less than 0.05). Similar decreases in LVEF was observed in both groups, from 0.60 to 0.42 in the elective induction group, and from 0.60 to 0.41 in the rapid-sequence induction group. The equal depression of LVEF indicates that laryngoscopy and intubation produce, with both induction regimens, sudden impairment of cardiac function. The more pronounced hypertension and tachycardia observed during rapid-sequence induction suggests a higher myocardial oxygen consumption which may represent a serious additional burden for the poorly perfused heart.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信