强迫选择动态三角形嗅觉法的气味阈值:再现性和计算方法。

A Dravnieks, W Schmidtsdorff, M Meilgaard
{"title":"强迫选择动态三角形嗅觉法的气味阈值:再现性和计算方法。","authors":"A Dravnieks, W Schmidtsdorff, M Meilgaard","doi":"10.1080/00022470.1986.10466128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reproducibility of odor thresholds determined by forced-choice dynamic triangle olfactometry was studied employing panels of 23- 45 subjects who tested 12 odorants, with four replications for one (1-butanol). Depending on the selection of panelists, their number, and between-session differences in olfactometer variables, the standard deviation of log(threshold) values ranged from 0.12 (same session, different panels of nine) to 0.37 (different sessions, different panels of nine). Among the demographic factors, only age was found significant; those below age of 30 were 1.6-3 times more sensitive than the older group. No systematic sensitivity difference was found between females and males, and nonsmokers and smokers. Suspicion has been raised in the literature that the method used here, ASTM E679, yields biased results. It is shown for panels of 6-45 members that such biases are inconsequential if the range of concentration presented to the panelists is large enough, and the group threshold is well wit...","PeriodicalId":17188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00022470.1986.10466128","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Odor thresholds by forced-choice dynamic triangle olfactometry: reproducibility and methods of calculation.\",\"authors\":\"A Dravnieks, W Schmidtsdorff, M Meilgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00022470.1986.10466128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The reproducibility of odor thresholds determined by forced-choice dynamic triangle olfactometry was studied employing panels of 23- 45 subjects who tested 12 odorants, with four replications for one (1-butanol). Depending on the selection of panelists, their number, and between-session differences in olfactometer variables, the standard deviation of log(threshold) values ranged from 0.12 (same session, different panels of nine) to 0.37 (different sessions, different panels of nine). Among the demographic factors, only age was found significant; those below age of 30 were 1.6-3 times more sensitive than the older group. No systematic sensitivity difference was found between females and males, and nonsmokers and smokers. Suspicion has been raised in the literature that the method used here, ASTM E679, yields biased results. It is shown for panels of 6-45 members that such biases are inconsequential if the range of concentration presented to the panelists is large enough, and the group threshold is well wit...\",\"PeriodicalId\":17188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00022470.1986.10466128\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1986.10466128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1986.10466128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Odor thresholds by forced-choice dynamic triangle olfactometry: reproducibility and methods of calculation.
The reproducibility of odor thresholds determined by forced-choice dynamic triangle olfactometry was studied employing panels of 23- 45 subjects who tested 12 odorants, with four replications for one (1-butanol). Depending on the selection of panelists, their number, and between-session differences in olfactometer variables, the standard deviation of log(threshold) values ranged from 0.12 (same session, different panels of nine) to 0.37 (different sessions, different panels of nine). Among the demographic factors, only age was found significant; those below age of 30 were 1.6-3 times more sensitive than the older group. No systematic sensitivity difference was found between females and males, and nonsmokers and smokers. Suspicion has been raised in the literature that the method used here, ASTM E679, yields biased results. It is shown for panels of 6-45 members that such biases are inconsequential if the range of concentration presented to the panelists is large enough, and the group threshold is well wit...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信