凝固酶阴性微球菌科β -内酰胺酶的产生。

V T Rosdahl, J O Jarløv, A M Knudsen
{"title":"凝固酶阴性微球菌科β -内酰胺酶的产生。","authors":"V T Rosdahl,&nbsp;J O Jarløv,&nbsp;A M Knudsen","doi":"10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03078.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A total of 8 penicillin-susceptible and 55 penicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Micrococcaceae were investigated for their beta-lactamase production by one quantitative and three qualitative methods. Seven of the 8 penicillin-susceptible strains had no beta-lactamase production; one had a very low production. Among the 55 penicillin-resistant strains, 54 produced beta-lactamase (mean 63 units/mg bacteria). Methicillin/gentamicin-resistant strains produced less enzyme than strains susceptible to these antibiotics. The percentage extracellularity (mean 18%) was lower than in Staphylococcus aureus, whereas the induction ratio (mean 56) was higher. No significant difference between the different species could be observed, but 70% of the strains were Staphylococcus epidermidis. Among the 55 beta-lactamase producing strains, the microbiological clover-leaf method detected 51, the iodometric method 40 and the chromogenic cephalosporin method 38. None of the three qualitative methods gave any false positive reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7045,"journal":{"name":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","volume":"94 6","pages":"423-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03078.x","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"beta-lactamase production in coagulase-negative micrococcaceae.\",\"authors\":\"V T Rosdahl,&nbsp;J O Jarløv,&nbsp;A M Knudsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03078.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A total of 8 penicillin-susceptible and 55 penicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Micrococcaceae were investigated for their beta-lactamase production by one quantitative and three qualitative methods. Seven of the 8 penicillin-susceptible strains had no beta-lactamase production; one had a very low production. Among the 55 penicillin-resistant strains, 54 produced beta-lactamase (mean 63 units/mg bacteria). Methicillin/gentamicin-resistant strains produced less enzyme than strains susceptible to these antibiotics. The percentage extracellularity (mean 18%) was lower than in Staphylococcus aureus, whereas the induction ratio (mean 56) was higher. No significant difference between the different species could be observed, but 70% of the strains were Staphylococcus epidermidis. Among the 55 beta-lactamase producing strains, the microbiological clover-leaf method detected 51, the iodometric method 40 and the chromogenic cephalosporin method 38. None of the three qualitative methods gave any false positive reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"94 6\",\"pages\":\"423-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03078.x\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03078.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica. Section B, Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1699-0463.1986.tb03078.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

采用1定量3定性方法对8株青霉素敏感微球菌和55株青霉素耐药凝固酶阴性微球菌进行β -内酰胺酶产酶测定。8株青霉素敏感菌株中有7株不产β -内酰胺酶;一个产量很低。在55株青霉素耐药菌株中,54株产生β -内酰胺酶(平均63单位/mg细菌)。耐甲氧西林/庆大霉素菌株比对这些抗生素敏感的菌株产生更少的酶。细胞外比例(平均18%)低于金黄色葡萄球菌,而诱导率(平均56%)高于金黄色葡萄球菌。不同菌种间差异不显著,但70%的菌株为表皮葡萄球菌。55株产β -内酰胺酶菌株中,微生物三叶草法检出51株,碘量法检出40株,显色头孢菌素法检出38株。三种定性方法均未出现假阳性反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
beta-lactamase production in coagulase-negative micrococcaceae.

A total of 8 penicillin-susceptible and 55 penicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Micrococcaceae were investigated for their beta-lactamase production by one quantitative and three qualitative methods. Seven of the 8 penicillin-susceptible strains had no beta-lactamase production; one had a very low production. Among the 55 penicillin-resistant strains, 54 produced beta-lactamase (mean 63 units/mg bacteria). Methicillin/gentamicin-resistant strains produced less enzyme than strains susceptible to these antibiotics. The percentage extracellularity (mean 18%) was lower than in Staphylococcus aureus, whereas the induction ratio (mean 56) was higher. No significant difference between the different species could be observed, but 70% of the strains were Staphylococcus epidermidis. Among the 55 beta-lactamase producing strains, the microbiological clover-leaf method detected 51, the iodometric method 40 and the chromogenic cephalosporin method 38. None of the three qualitative methods gave any false positive reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信