乳腺前哨淋巴结转移性肿瘤大小测量的观察者间差异。

IF 3.2
Zena Jameel, Marilin Rosa
{"title":"乳腺前哨淋巴结转移性肿瘤大小测量的观察者间差异。","authors":"Zena Jameel, Marilin Rosa","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2025-0021-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Accurate measurement of breast cancer metastatic deposits in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be challenging despite the presence of guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess interobserver variability in measuring metastatic breast carcinoma involving axillary SLNs.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A survey of 10 microscopic images of lymph nodes involved by metastatic carcinoma was electronically shared with a large group of practicing pathologists. Images were all taken at ×1 or ×10 magnification from AE1/3-stained slides. Three options were included on how to measure metastatic foci (a, b, c) without providing the size. A fourth option for uncertain responses was included (not sure/other, d).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>A total of 88 pathologists completed the survey. We observed significant variability regarding how metastatic deposits are measured. Cases with extracapsular extension were prone to more variability (cases 5, 9, 10) with a significant number of the responders demonstrating uncertainty or excluding the extracapsular extension from the metastatic size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Our results underscore the inherent difficulty and thus the interobserver variability that exist when measuring and classifying small metastatic tumor deposits in SLNs, even when definitive guidelines have already been established.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interobserver Variability in the Measurement of the Metastatic Tumor Size on Breast Sentinel Lymph Nodes.\",\"authors\":\"Zena Jameel, Marilin Rosa\",\"doi\":\"10.5858/arpa.2025-0021-OA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Accurate measurement of breast cancer metastatic deposits in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be challenging despite the presence of guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To assess interobserver variability in measuring metastatic breast carcinoma involving axillary SLNs.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>A survey of 10 microscopic images of lymph nodes involved by metastatic carcinoma was electronically shared with a large group of practicing pathologists. Images were all taken at ×1 or ×10 magnification from AE1/3-stained slides. Three options were included on how to measure metastatic foci (a, b, c) without providing the size. A fourth option for uncertain responses was included (not sure/other, d).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>A total of 88 pathologists completed the survey. We observed significant variability regarding how metastatic deposits are measured. Cases with extracapsular extension were prone to more variability (cases 5, 9, 10) with a significant number of the responders demonstrating uncertainty or excluding the extracapsular extension from the metastatic size.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Our results underscore the inherent difficulty and thus the interobserver variability that exist when measuring and classifying small metastatic tumor deposits in SLNs, even when definitive guidelines have already been established.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2025-0021-OA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2025-0021-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上下文。尽管有相关的指导方针,准确测量乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(sln)转移性沉积仍具有挑战性。目的:评估在测量包括腋窝sln的转移性乳腺癌时观察者间的可变性。-:一份10张淋巴结转移癌显微图像的调查通过电子方式与一大群执业病理学家共享。图像均以×1或×10放大倍数从ae1 /3染色的载玻片上拍摄。在不提供转移灶大小的情况下,包括如何测量转移灶的三种选择(a, b, c)。不确定回答的第四个选项包括(不确定/其他,d)。-:共有88名病理学家完成了调查。我们观察到关于如何测量转移性沉积的显著差异。囊外延伸的病例更容易发生变异性(病例5、9、10),大量应答者表现出不确定或将囊外延伸从转移大小中排除。我们的结果强调了固有的困难,因此在测量和分类sln中的小转移性肿瘤沉积物时存在观察者之间的差异,即使已经建立了明确的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interobserver Variability in the Measurement of the Metastatic Tumor Size on Breast Sentinel Lymph Nodes.

Context.—: Accurate measurement of breast cancer metastatic deposits in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) can be challenging despite the presence of guidelines.

Objective.—: To assess interobserver variability in measuring metastatic breast carcinoma involving axillary SLNs.

Design.—: A survey of 10 microscopic images of lymph nodes involved by metastatic carcinoma was electronically shared with a large group of practicing pathologists. Images were all taken at ×1 or ×10 magnification from AE1/3-stained slides. Three options were included on how to measure metastatic foci (a, b, c) without providing the size. A fourth option for uncertain responses was included (not sure/other, d).

Results.—: A total of 88 pathologists completed the survey. We observed significant variability regarding how metastatic deposits are measured. Cases with extracapsular extension were prone to more variability (cases 5, 9, 10) with a significant number of the responders demonstrating uncertainty or excluding the extracapsular extension from the metastatic size.

Conclusions.—: Our results underscore the inherent difficulty and thus the interobserver variability that exist when measuring and classifying small metastatic tumor deposits in SLNs, even when definitive guidelines have already been established.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信