原发性开角型和假剥脱性青光眼的浅血管密度、视网膜神经纤维层厚度和视野丧失。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ante Prpić, Iva Ferček, Kim Kasa, Armin Kasumović, Ines Matoc, Idoia Goñi Guarro, Vedrana Vukić, Katia Novak-Lauš, Ivan Sabol, Zoran Vatavuk
{"title":"原发性开角型和假剥脱性青光眼的浅血管密度、视网膜神经纤维层厚度和视野丧失。","authors":"Ante Prpić, Iva Ferček, Kim Kasa, Armin Kasumović, Ines Matoc, Idoia Goñi Guarro, Vedrana Vukić, Katia Novak-Lauš, Ivan Sabol, Zoran Vatavuk","doi":"10.20471/acc.2024.63.03-04.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to examine peripapillary and macular superficial vessel density, peripapillary thickness of the nerve fiber layer, and inner thickness of the macula in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG) depending on the visual field impairment. A total of 50 eyes were diagnosed as POAG and 50 as PXG. Both groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to HAP2 criteria of visual field impairment. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). Radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, superficial macular vessel density (SMVD), and macular thickness between the inner limiting membrane and inner plexiform layer (ILM-IPL) were compared. The overall mean measured values did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. All measured parameters were statistically significantly lower with more extensive visual field damage within the group. The strongest positive correlation was found between the pRNFL thickness and RPC density values (p=0.893), and strongest negative correlation between the mean defect of visual field and ILM-IPL (p=-0.824). No statistically significant difference was found between POAG and PXG in all values measured on OCT-A. In conclusion, visual field loss is more strongly correlated with the loss of nerve fiber layer thickness than the superficial vessel density, which may suggest that the loss of RNFL precedes the loss of superficial vessel density.</p>","PeriodicalId":7072,"journal":{"name":"Acta clinica Croatica","volume":"63 3-4","pages":"751-757"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SUPERFICIAL VESSEL DENSITY, RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS, AND VISUAL FIELD LOSS IN PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE AND PSEUDOEXFOLIATIVE GLAUCOMA.\",\"authors\":\"Ante Prpić, Iva Ferček, Kim Kasa, Armin Kasumović, Ines Matoc, Idoia Goñi Guarro, Vedrana Vukić, Katia Novak-Lauš, Ivan Sabol, Zoran Vatavuk\",\"doi\":\"10.20471/acc.2024.63.03-04.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim was to examine peripapillary and macular superficial vessel density, peripapillary thickness of the nerve fiber layer, and inner thickness of the macula in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG) depending on the visual field impairment. A total of 50 eyes were diagnosed as POAG and 50 as PXG. Both groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to HAP2 criteria of visual field impairment. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). Radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, superficial macular vessel density (SMVD), and macular thickness between the inner limiting membrane and inner plexiform layer (ILM-IPL) were compared. The overall mean measured values did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. All measured parameters were statistically significantly lower with more extensive visual field damage within the group. The strongest positive correlation was found between the pRNFL thickness and RPC density values (p=0.893), and strongest negative correlation between the mean defect of visual field and ILM-IPL (p=-0.824). No statistically significant difference was found between POAG and PXG in all values measured on OCT-A. In conclusion, visual field loss is more strongly correlated with the loss of nerve fiber layer thickness than the superficial vessel density, which may suggest that the loss of RNFL precedes the loss of superficial vessel density.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta clinica Croatica\",\"volume\":\"63 3-4\",\"pages\":\"751-757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490456/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta clinica Croatica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2024.63.03-04.36\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta clinica Croatica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2024.63.03-04.36","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的是观察原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)和假性剥脱型青光眼(PXG)患者的乳头周围和黄斑表面血管密度、乳头周围神经纤维层厚度和黄斑内部厚度。50眼诊断为POAG, 50眼诊断为PXG。两组均按视野损害的HAP2标准分为3个亚组。所有眼睛均行光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCT-A)。比较桡骨乳头周围毛细血管(RPC)密度、乳头周围视网膜神经纤维层(pRNFL)厚度、黄斑浅血管密度(SMVD)、黄斑内限定膜与内丛状层(ILM-IPL)厚度。总体平均测量值在组间无统计学差异。所有测量参数均有统计学意义显著降低,组内视野损害范围更广。pRNFL厚度与RPC密度值呈正相关(p=0.893),视野平均缺损与ILM-IPL呈负相关(p=-0.824)。POAG和PXG在OCT-A上的所有测量值均无统计学差异。综上所述,视野丧失与神经纤维层厚度丧失的相关性强于与浅血管密度丧失的相关性,这可能表明RNFL的丧失先于浅血管密度丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SUPERFICIAL VESSEL DENSITY, RETINAL NERVE FIBER LAYER THICKNESS, AND VISUAL FIELD LOSS IN PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE AND PSEUDOEXFOLIATIVE GLAUCOMA.

The aim was to examine peripapillary and macular superficial vessel density, peripapillary thickness of the nerve fiber layer, and inner thickness of the macula in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG) depending on the visual field impairment. A total of 50 eyes were diagnosed as POAG and 50 as PXG. Both groups were divided into 3 subgroups according to HAP2 criteria of visual field impairment. All eyes underwent optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A). Radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) density, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, superficial macular vessel density (SMVD), and macular thickness between the inner limiting membrane and inner plexiform layer (ILM-IPL) were compared. The overall mean measured values did not show a statistically significant difference between the groups. All measured parameters were statistically significantly lower with more extensive visual field damage within the group. The strongest positive correlation was found between the pRNFL thickness and RPC density values (p=0.893), and strongest negative correlation between the mean defect of visual field and ILM-IPL (p=-0.824). No statistically significant difference was found between POAG and PXG in all values measured on OCT-A. In conclusion, visual field loss is more strongly correlated with the loss of nerve fiber layer thickness than the superficial vessel density, which may suggest that the loss of RNFL precedes the loss of superficial vessel density.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta clinica Croatica
Acta clinica Croatica 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Croatica is a peer reviewed general medical journal that publishes original articles that advance and improve medical science and practice and that serve the purpose of transfer of original and valuable information to journal readers. Acta Clinica Croatica is published in English four times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信