Di Zhang, Ting Luo, Feng Gao, Yong Sun, Zihao Dai, Jiao Liu, Jiangning Gu, Zhuo Yang
{"title":"完全覆盖与未覆盖自膨胀金属支架治疗不能手术的恶性胆道远端梗阻的比较:回顾性研究。","authors":"Di Zhang, Ting Luo, Feng Gao, Yong Sun, Zihao Dai, Jiao Liu, Jiangning Gu, Zhuo Yang","doi":"10.1177/26317745251376845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal choice between fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metallic stent (USEMS) for managing inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) remains debatable. This study aims to compare the efficacy of CSEMS and USEMS in patients with MDBO.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted with inoperable MDBO between January 2017 to December 2021 who underwent either USEMS or FCSEMS implantations via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Primary outcomes were overall survival and stent patency. Secondary outcomes were stent occlusion rates and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 310 patients (235 patients received FCSEMS implantations and 75 received USEMS implantations). Median follow-up duration was 5.2 months. No significant difference was observed in overall survival between the FCSEMS and USEMS groups (167 vs 169 days, <i>p</i> = 0.566). The mean stent patency duration was longer in the FCSEMS group compared to the USEMS group (445 vs 348 days, <i>p</i> = 0.020). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) (HR = 1.259, 95% CI: 1.167-1.358, <i>p</i> < 0.001), USEMS (HR = 2.277, 95% CI: 1.750-2.963, <i>p</i> < 0.001), stent length (HR = 1.804, 95% CI: 1.662-1.959, <i>p</i> < 0.001), preoperative biliary stent (HR = 1.166, 95% CI: 1.070-1.271, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and non-pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.404, 95% CI: 1.299-1.516, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independent risk factors for stent occlusion, while BMI ⩾ 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (HR = 0.600, 95% CI: 0.548-0.657, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was identified as a protective factor. In the subgroup analysis for pancreatic cancer, patients with FCSEMS (<i>n</i> = 109) had an average survival time of 154.14 ± 93.93 days, while those with USEMS (<i>n</i> = 34) had an average survival time of 130.32 ± 57.31 days (<i>p</i> = 0.21). For non-pancreatic cancer, patients with FCSEMS (<i>n</i> = 115) had an average survival time of 194.10 ± 93.40 days, and patients with USEMS (<i>n</i> = 34) had an average survival time of 204.97 ± 93.40 days (<i>p</i> = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to USEMS, FCSEMS provides a longer stent patency duration for patients with MDBO. However, no significant differences were found in overall survival and postoperative complications in this retrospective study.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"18 ","pages":"26317745251376845"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fully covered versus uncovered self-expandable metallic stents in treating inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Di Zhang, Ting Luo, Feng Gao, Yong Sun, Zihao Dai, Jiao Liu, Jiangning Gu, Zhuo Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26317745251376845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal choice between fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metallic stent (USEMS) for managing inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) remains debatable. This study aims to compare the efficacy of CSEMS and USEMS in patients with MDBO.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted with inoperable MDBO between January 2017 to December 2021 who underwent either USEMS or FCSEMS implantations via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Primary outcomes were overall survival and stent patency. Secondary outcomes were stent occlusion rates and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 310 patients (235 patients received FCSEMS implantations and 75 received USEMS implantations). Median follow-up duration was 5.2 months. No significant difference was observed in overall survival between the FCSEMS and USEMS groups (167 vs 169 days, <i>p</i> = 0.566). The mean stent patency duration was longer in the FCSEMS group compared to the USEMS group (445 vs 348 days, <i>p</i> = 0.020). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) (HR = 1.259, 95% CI: 1.167-1.358, <i>p</i> < 0.001), USEMS (HR = 2.277, 95% CI: 1.750-2.963, <i>p</i> < 0.001), stent length (HR = 1.804, 95% CI: 1.662-1.959, <i>p</i> < 0.001), preoperative biliary stent (HR = 1.166, 95% CI: 1.070-1.271, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and non-pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.404, 95% CI: 1.299-1.516, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were independent risk factors for stent occlusion, while BMI ⩾ 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (HR = 0.600, 95% CI: 0.548-0.657, <i>p</i> < 0.001) was identified as a protective factor. In the subgroup analysis for pancreatic cancer, patients with FCSEMS (<i>n</i> = 109) had an average survival time of 154.14 ± 93.93 days, while those with USEMS (<i>n</i> = 34) had an average survival time of 130.32 ± 57.31 days (<i>p</i> = 0.21). For non-pancreatic cancer, patients with FCSEMS (<i>n</i> = 115) had an average survival time of 194.10 ± 93.40 days, and patients with USEMS (<i>n</i> = 34) had an average survival time of 204.97 ± 93.40 days (<i>p</i> = 0.67).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to USEMS, FCSEMS provides a longer stent patency duration for patients with MDBO. However, no significant differences were found in overall survival and postoperative complications in this retrospective study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"26317745251376845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12480805/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745251376845\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745251376845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对于不能手术的恶性胆道远端梗阻(MDBO),全覆盖自膨胀金属支架(FCSEMSs)和未覆盖自膨胀金属支架(USEMS)的最佳选择仍然存在争议。本研究旨在比较cems和USEMS在MDBO患者中的疗效。方法:回顾性分析2017年1月至2021年12月期间,通过内镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)进行USEMS或fcems植入的不可手术MDBO患者。主要结局是总生存和支架通畅。次要结果是支架闭塞率和术后并发症。结果:本研究纳入310例患者,其中fcems种植体235例,USEMS种植体75例。中位随访时间为5.2个月。fcems组和USEMS组的总生存期无显著差异(167天vs 169天,p = 0.566)。与USEMS组相比,fcems组的平均支架通畅时间更长(445天vs 348天,p = 0.020)。两组术后并发症无明显差异。多因素分析显示,内镜下括括肌切开术(EST)组(HR = 1.259, 95% CI: 1.167 ~ 1.358, p p p p p 2 (HR = 0.600, 95% CI: 0.548 ~ 0.657, p n = 109)的平均生存时间为154.14±93.93天,而USEMS组(n = 34)的平均生存时间为130.32±57.31天(p = 0.21)。对于非胰腺癌,FCSEMS患者(n = 115)的平均生存时间为194.10±93.40天,USEMS患者(n = 34)的平均生存时间为204.97±93.40天(p = 0.67)。结论:与USEMS相比,fcems为MDBO患者提供了更长的支架通畅时间。然而,在这项回顾性研究中,总生存率和术后并发症没有发现显著差异。
Comparison of fully covered versus uncovered self-expandable metallic stents in treating inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a retrospective study.
Background: The optimal choice between fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMSs) and uncovered self-expandable metallic stent (USEMS) for managing inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction (MDBO) remains debatable. This study aims to compare the efficacy of CSEMS and USEMS in patients with MDBO.
Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted with inoperable MDBO between January 2017 to December 2021 who underwent either USEMS or FCSEMS implantations via endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Primary outcomes were overall survival and stent patency. Secondary outcomes were stent occlusion rates and postoperative complications.
Results: This study included 310 patients (235 patients received FCSEMS implantations and 75 received USEMS implantations). Median follow-up duration was 5.2 months. No significant difference was observed in overall survival between the FCSEMS and USEMS groups (167 vs 169 days, p = 0.566). The mean stent patency duration was longer in the FCSEMS group compared to the USEMS group (445 vs 348 days, p = 0.020). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the two groups. Multivariate analysis indicated that endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) (HR = 1.259, 95% CI: 1.167-1.358, p < 0.001), USEMS (HR = 2.277, 95% CI: 1.750-2.963, p < 0.001), stent length (HR = 1.804, 95% CI: 1.662-1.959, p < 0.001), preoperative biliary stent (HR = 1.166, 95% CI: 1.070-1.271, p < 0.001) and non-pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.404, 95% CI: 1.299-1.516, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for stent occlusion, while BMI ⩾ 24 kg/m2 (HR = 0.600, 95% CI: 0.548-0.657, p < 0.001) was identified as a protective factor. In the subgroup analysis for pancreatic cancer, patients with FCSEMS (n = 109) had an average survival time of 154.14 ± 93.93 days, while those with USEMS (n = 34) had an average survival time of 130.32 ± 57.31 days (p = 0.21). For non-pancreatic cancer, patients with FCSEMS (n = 115) had an average survival time of 194.10 ± 93.40 days, and patients with USEMS (n = 34) had an average survival time of 204.97 ± 93.40 days (p = 0.67).
Conclusion: Compared to USEMS, FCSEMS provides a longer stent patency duration for patients with MDBO. However, no significant differences were found in overall survival and postoperative complications in this retrospective study.