谁需要法律？作为批判的多重意识

IF 1.9 3区社会学 Q1 LAW

Journal of Law and Society Pub Date : 2025-07-04 DOI:10.1111/jols.12552

TARA MULQUEEN

{"title":"谁需要法律？作为批判的多重意识","authors":"TARA MULQUEEN","doi":"10.1111/jols.12552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This essay offers a response to Dr Lizzy Willimington's article and a reflection on the history of critical and socio-legal studies. It points to critique as a normative question rather than a methodological one and discusses this idea through the history of legal needs and legal consciousness research. It draws on the insights of critical race theory to argue that there is no impasse between critical and socio-legal research and advances the idea of ‘multiple consciousness’ as critique.</p>","PeriodicalId":51544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Society","volume":"52 S1","pages":"S176-S181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.12552","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who needs the law? Multiple consciousness as critique\",\"authors\":\"TARA MULQUEEN\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jols.12552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This essay offers a response to Dr Lizzy Willimington's article and a reflection on the history of critical and socio-legal studies. It points to critique as a normative question rather than a methodological one and discusses this idea through the history of legal needs and legal consciousness research. It draws on the insights of critical race theory to argue that there is no impasse between critical and socio-legal research and advances the idea of ‘multiple consciousness’ as critique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"volume\":\"52 S1\",\"pages\":\"S176-S181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jols.12552\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12552\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jols.12552","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对Lizzy Willimington博士的文章做出了回应，并对批判和社会法律研究的历史进行了反思。它指出批判是一个规范性问题，而不是一个方法论问题，并通过法律需要和法律意识研究的历史来讨论这一观点。它借鉴了批判种族理论的见解，认为在批判和社会法律研究之间没有僵局，并提出了“多重意识”作为批判的想法。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Who needs the law? Multiple consciousness as critique

查看原文本刊更多论文

Who needs the law? Multiple consciousness as critique

This essay offers a response to Dr Lizzy Willimington's article and a reflection on the history of critical and socio-legal studies. It points to critique as a normative question rather than a methodological one and discusses this idea through the history of legal needs and legal consciousness research. It draws on the insights of critical race theory to argue that there is no impasse between critical and socio-legal research and advances the idea of ‘multiple consciousness’ as critique.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Law and Society Multiple-

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Established as the leading British periodical for Socio-Legal Studies The Journal of Law and Society offers an interdisciplinary approach. It is committed to achieving a broad international appeal, attracting contributions and addressing issues from a range of legal cultures, as well as theoretical concerns of cross- cultural interest. It produces an annual special issue, which is also published in book form. It has a widely respected Book Review section and is cited all over the world. Challenging, authoritative and topical, the journal appeals to legal researchers and practitioners as well as sociologists, criminologists and other social scientists.