评估公民参与的有效性:制定影响方案。

IF 2.5 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Franziska Sörgel, Nora Weinberger, Julia Hahn, Christine Milchram, Maria Maia
{"title":"评估公民参与的有效性:制定影响方案。","authors":"Franziska Sörgel, Nora Weinberger, Julia Hahn, Christine Milchram, Maria Maia","doi":"10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the impact of participatory processes in research organisations, focusing on the 'Citizens' Dialogues' initiative at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. As research increasingly embraces inclusive approaches, the article presents a scheme designed to evaluate the effects of such dialogues on different actor groups: citizens, scientists and institutional management. Drawing from both literature and practical experience, the scheme assesses immediate, gradual and continual impacts, offering insights into the effectiveness of participatory formats in shaping research agendas and promoting democratic engagement with academic research. Additionally, the article explores how this scheme can be applied to other contexts, enhancing the integration of participatory outcomes into research decision-making processes. By providing a structured approach to impact assessment, this work contributes to the broader understanding of how citizen participation influences scientific research and its societal relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51652,"journal":{"name":"Evidence & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effectiveness of citizen participation: the development of an impact scheme.\",\"authors\":\"Franziska Sörgel, Nora Weinberger, Julia Hahn, Christine Milchram, Maria Maia\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines the impact of participatory processes in research organisations, focusing on the 'Citizens' Dialogues' initiative at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. As research increasingly embraces inclusive approaches, the article presents a scheme designed to evaluate the effects of such dialogues on different actor groups: citizens, scientists and institutional management. Drawing from both literature and practical experience, the scheme assesses immediate, gradual and continual impacts, offering insights into the effectiveness of participatory formats in shaping research agendas and promoting democratic engagement with academic research. Additionally, the article explores how this scheme can be applied to other contexts, enhancing the integration of participatory outcomes into research decision-making processes. By providing a structured approach to impact assessment, this work contributes to the broader understanding of how citizen participation influences scientific research and its societal relevance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000066\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17442648Y2025D000000066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了参与式过程在研究机构中的影响,重点关注了卡尔斯鲁厄理工学院的“公民对话”倡议。随着研究越来越多地采用包容性方法,本文提出了一个方案,旨在评估这种对话对不同行动者群体(公民、科学家和机构管理)的影响。根据文献和实践经验,该方案评估了直接、渐进和持续的影响,为参与式模式在制定研究议程和促进学术研究的民主参与方面的有效性提供了见解。此外,本文还探讨了如何将该方案应用于其他环境,从而加强将参与性成果整合到研究决策过程中。通过提供影响评估的结构化方法,这项工作有助于更广泛地了解公民参与如何影响科学研究及其社会相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the effectiveness of citizen participation: the development of an impact scheme.

This article examines the impact of participatory processes in research organisations, focusing on the 'Citizens' Dialogues' initiative at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. As research increasingly embraces inclusive approaches, the article presents a scheme designed to evaluate the effects of such dialogues on different actor groups: citizens, scientists and institutional management. Drawing from both literature and practical experience, the scheme assesses immediate, gradual and continual impacts, offering insights into the effectiveness of participatory formats in shaping research agendas and promoting democratic engagement with academic research. Additionally, the article explores how this scheme can be applied to other contexts, enhancing the integration of participatory outcomes into research decision-making processes. By providing a structured approach to impact assessment, this work contributes to the broader understanding of how citizen participation influences scientific research and its societal relevance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence & Policy
Evidence & Policy SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
53
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信