颏翼截骨术的可行性:它能被认为是正颌外科的常规手术吗?

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
S Silvestri, M Savoini, M Bonaso, P Asperio
{"title":"颏翼截骨术的可行性:它能被认为是正颌外科的常规手术吗?","authors":"S Silvestri, M Savoini, M Bonaso, P Asperio","doi":"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Chin Wing osteotomy represents a choice of alternative genioplasty, well described in literature but until today slightly used, mainly due to the greater risk of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) related compared to the classic genioplasty. The study aims to better analyze the rate of nerve damage and its real impact on the patient's daily life. A retrospective study of 26 patients who underwent to BSSO in a first stage without IAN sensitivity disturbs reported and chin wing genioplasty in a second stage, between 2019 and 2024 was performed. A total of 23 patients were included and subdivided in two groups: 10 patients underwent BSSO+ mini Chin wing osteotomy (Group B), 13 patients underwent BSSO+ complete Chin Wing osteotomy (Group A). We analyzed rates of IAN damage by using some clinical neurosensory at least 12 months after surgery testing lower lip and chin area residual sensitivity for each group. We also analyzed patients' quality of life after chin wing osteotomy by using a subjective questionnaire and life quality questionnaire (OHIP-14) administered at the patient's 1 year follow up appointment. There was 72% recovery in Group A and 70 % recovery in Group B after 1 year follow up. Only for two-point discrimination and tactile sensitivity significant difference between anterior and complete chin wing osteotomy was found: slight better sensitivity after mini wing osteotomy. The sensibility of IAN discreetly preserved and which does not interfere with quality of life. Excellent patient satisfaction from a functional and aesthetic point of view was reached.</p>","PeriodicalId":56038,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"102560"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Chin Wing Osteotomy: Can it be considered a routine procedure in orthognathic surgery?\",\"authors\":\"S Silvestri, M Savoini, M Bonaso, P Asperio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Chin Wing osteotomy represents a choice of alternative genioplasty, well described in literature but until today slightly used, mainly due to the greater risk of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) related compared to the classic genioplasty. The study aims to better analyze the rate of nerve damage and its real impact on the patient's daily life. A retrospective study of 26 patients who underwent to BSSO in a first stage without IAN sensitivity disturbs reported and chin wing genioplasty in a second stage, between 2019 and 2024 was performed. A total of 23 patients were included and subdivided in two groups: 10 patients underwent BSSO+ mini Chin wing osteotomy (Group B), 13 patients underwent BSSO+ complete Chin Wing osteotomy (Group A). We analyzed rates of IAN damage by using some clinical neurosensory at least 12 months after surgery testing lower lip and chin area residual sensitivity for each group. We also analyzed patients' quality of life after chin wing osteotomy by using a subjective questionnaire and life quality questionnaire (OHIP-14) administered at the patient's 1 year follow up appointment. There was 72% recovery in Group A and 70 % recovery in Group B after 1 year follow up. Only for two-point discrimination and tactile sensitivity significant difference between anterior and complete chin wing osteotomy was found: slight better sensitivity after mini wing osteotomy. The sensibility of IAN discreetly preserved and which does not interfere with quality of life. Excellent patient satisfaction from a functional and aesthetic point of view was reached.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56038,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102560\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stomatology Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2025.102560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颏翼截骨术是一种替代的颏成形术,在文献中有很好的描述,但直到今天很少使用,主要是因为与传统的颏成形术相比,颏翼截骨术对下牙槽神经(IAN)的损伤风险更大。这项研究旨在更好地分析神经损伤率及其对患者日常生活的实际影响。在2019年至2024年期间,对26名患者进行了回顾性研究,这些患者在第一阶段接受了BSSO,未报告IAN敏感性障碍,并在第二阶段接受了颏翼成形术。共纳入23例患者,分为两组:10例患者行BSSO+迷你颏翼截骨术(B组),13例患者行BSSO+完全颏翼截骨术(A组)。我们通过术后至少12个月的临床神经感觉检测各组下唇和下巴区域残留敏感性来分析IAN损伤率。我们还通过主观问卷和生活质量问卷(OHIP-14)对患者进行1年随访,分析患者颏翼截骨术后的生活质量。经1年随访,A组恢复72%,B组恢复70%。仅在两点辨别和触觉敏感度上,前翼与完全颏翼截骨有显著性差异:小翼截骨后敏感度稍好。谨慎地保留了IAN的敏感性,并且不影响生活质量。从功能和美学的角度来看,达到了极好的患者满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Chin Wing Osteotomy: Can it be considered a routine procedure in orthognathic surgery?

The Chin Wing osteotomy represents a choice of alternative genioplasty, well described in literature but until today slightly used, mainly due to the greater risk of damage to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) related compared to the classic genioplasty. The study aims to better analyze the rate of nerve damage and its real impact on the patient's daily life. A retrospective study of 26 patients who underwent to BSSO in a first stage without IAN sensitivity disturbs reported and chin wing genioplasty in a second stage, between 2019 and 2024 was performed. A total of 23 patients were included and subdivided in two groups: 10 patients underwent BSSO+ mini Chin wing osteotomy (Group B), 13 patients underwent BSSO+ complete Chin Wing osteotomy (Group A). We analyzed rates of IAN damage by using some clinical neurosensory at least 12 months after surgery testing lower lip and chin area residual sensitivity for each group. We also analyzed patients' quality of life after chin wing osteotomy by using a subjective questionnaire and life quality questionnaire (OHIP-14) administered at the patient's 1 year follow up appointment. There was 72% recovery in Group A and 70 % recovery in Group B after 1 year follow up. Only for two-point discrimination and tactile sensitivity significant difference between anterior and complete chin wing osteotomy was found: slight better sensitivity after mini wing osteotomy. The sensibility of IAN discreetly preserved and which does not interfere with quality of life. Excellent patient satisfaction from a functional and aesthetic point of view was reached.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
305
期刊介绍: J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg publishes research papers and techniques - (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, technical notes, case reports, images, letters to the editor, guidelines - dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise in all fields relevant to oral and maxillofacial surgery: from plastic and reconstructive surgery of the face, oral surgery and medicine, … to dentofacial and maxillofacial orthopedics. Original articles include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. All manuscripts submitted to the journal are subjected to peer review by international experts, and must: Be written in excellent English, clear and easy to understand, precise and concise; Bring new, interesting, valid information - and improve clinical care or guide future research; Be solely the work of the author(s) stated; Not have been previously published elsewhere and not be under consideration by another journal; Be in accordance with the journal''s Guide for Authors'' instructions: manuscripts that fail to comply with these rules may be returned to the authors without being reviewed. Under no circumstances does the journal guarantee publication before the editorial board makes its final decision. The journal is indexed in the main international databases and is accessible worldwide through the ScienceDirect and ClinicalKey Platforms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信