酮康唑、咪康唑和两性霉素B在不同培养基中对卢西塔假丝酵母和蔗糖阴性热带假丝酵母的抑菌活性比较。

F Mignini, M Prenna, S Oliveri, E Cammarata, E Falcioni, B Dainelli, S Ripa
{"title":"酮康唑、咪康唑和两性霉素B在不同培养基中对卢西塔假丝酵母和蔗糖阴性热带假丝酵母的抑菌活性比较。","authors":"F Mignini,&nbsp;M Prenna,&nbsp;S Oliveri,&nbsp;E Cammarata,&nbsp;E Falcioni,&nbsp;B Dainelli,&nbsp;S Ripa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluates the susceptibility of sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and Candida lusitaniae strains to amphotericin B (AMB), miconazole (MCZ) and ketoconazole (KTZ). The susceptibility tests were carried out in different media: Antibiotic Medium 3 (AM-3m) and Earle Minimum Essential Medium (E-MEM) for AMB: Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) and E-MEM for imidazole compounds. The minimal fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of AMB were slightly higher than minimal inhibitory concentration (MICs) except against Candida lusitaniae strains; whereas the MFCs of MCZ and KTZ were higher than the MICs by almost two-fold for all strains tested. AMB was more efficacious against sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and the MICs were very definite; on the contrary, the MICs with KTZ were difficult to read. The MICs of AMB in E-MEM were essentially the same as those in AM-3m; whereas for KTZ and MCZ determined in YNB the MICs were generally higher than those obtained in E-MEM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9733,"journal":{"name":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative activity in different media of ketoconazole, miconazole and amphotericin B against Candida lusitaniae and sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis.\",\"authors\":\"F Mignini,&nbsp;M Prenna,&nbsp;S Oliveri,&nbsp;E Cammarata,&nbsp;E Falcioni,&nbsp;B Dainelli,&nbsp;S Ripa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study evaluates the susceptibility of sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and Candida lusitaniae strains to amphotericin B (AMB), miconazole (MCZ) and ketoconazole (KTZ). The susceptibility tests were carried out in different media: Antibiotic Medium 3 (AM-3m) and Earle Minimum Essential Medium (E-MEM) for AMB: Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) and E-MEM for imidazole compounds. The minimal fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of AMB were slightly higher than minimal inhibitory concentration (MICs) except against Candida lusitaniae strains; whereas the MFCs of MCZ and KTZ were higher than the MICs by almost two-fold for all strains tested. AMB was more efficacious against sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and the MICs were very definite; on the contrary, the MICs with KTZ were difficult to read. The MICs of AMB in E-MEM were essentially the same as those in AM-3m; whereas for KTZ and MCZ determined in YNB the MICs were generally higher than those obtained in E-MEM.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemioterapia : international journal of the Mediterranean Society of Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评价了蔗糖阴性的热带念珠菌和卢西塔念珠菌对两性霉素B (AMB)、咪康唑(MCZ)和酮康唑(KTZ)的敏感性。采用抗生素培养基3 (AM-3m)和厄尔最低基本培养基(E-MEM)对AMB进行药敏试验,酵母氮碱(YNB)和E-MEM对咪唑类化合物进行药敏试验。除对卢西塔念珠菌外,AMB的最低杀真菌浓度(mfc)略高于最低抑菌浓度(mic);而MCZ和KTZ的mfc比mic高出近2倍。AMB对蔗糖阴性的热带假丝酵母更有效,mic非常明确;相反,带有KTZ的mic则难以阅读。E-MEM中AMB的mic与AM-3m基本相同;而YNB测定的KTZ和MCZ的mic值普遍高于E-MEM测定的mic值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative activity in different media of ketoconazole, miconazole and amphotericin B against Candida lusitaniae and sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis.

This study evaluates the susceptibility of sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and Candida lusitaniae strains to amphotericin B (AMB), miconazole (MCZ) and ketoconazole (KTZ). The susceptibility tests were carried out in different media: Antibiotic Medium 3 (AM-3m) and Earle Minimum Essential Medium (E-MEM) for AMB: Yeast Nitrogen Base (YNB) and E-MEM for imidazole compounds. The minimal fungicidal concentrations (MFCs) of AMB were slightly higher than minimal inhibitory concentration (MICs) except against Candida lusitaniae strains; whereas the MFCs of MCZ and KTZ were higher than the MICs by almost two-fold for all strains tested. AMB was more efficacious against sucrose-negative Candida tropicalis and the MICs were very definite; on the contrary, the MICs with KTZ were difficult to read. The MICs of AMB in E-MEM were essentially the same as those in AM-3m; whereas for KTZ and MCZ determined in YNB the MICs were generally higher than those obtained in E-MEM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信