有或没有rhPDGF - BB的胶原基质软组织增强后根覆盖结果的稳定性:一项为期3年的三盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Lorenzo Tavelli, Shayan Barootchi, Maria Vera Rodriguez, Leonardo Mancini, Hamoun Sabri, Tu Nguyen, Jad Majzoub, Suncica Travan, William V. Giannobile
{"title":"有或没有rhPDGF - BB的胶原基质软组织增强后根覆盖结果的稳定性:一项为期3年的三盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验","authors":"Lorenzo Tavelli, Shayan Barootchi, Maria Vera Rodriguez, Leonardo Mancini, Hamoun Sabri, Tu Nguyen, Jad Majzoub, Suncica Travan, William V. Giannobile","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo evaluate the 3‐year stability of root coverage outcomes following treatment with a coronally advanced flap (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">CAF</jats:styled-content>) and a volume‐stable, cross‐linked xenogeneic collagen matrix (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VCMX</jats:styled-content>), either soaked in recombinant human platelet–derived growth factor‐<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BB</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">rhPDGF</jats:styled-content>, test arm) or sterile saline (control arm).MethodsOf the original 30 participants in the triple‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial, 26 were available for follow‐up at 1 and 3 years. The primary outcome was mean root coverage (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">mRC</jats:styled-content>) at 3 years compared to the 6‐month results. Secondary outcomes included complete root coverage, keratinised tissue width, gingival thickness, volumetric and aesthetic changes, patient‐reported outcome measures (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PROMs</jats:styled-content>) and ultrasonographic tissue properties. Untreated contralateral teeth were also assessed.ResultsFrom 6 months to 3 years, <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">mRC</jats:styled-content> decreased by 6.7% in the control arm and 7.5% in the test arm (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). Over 90% of treated sites maintained a stable gingival margin (≤ 0.5 mm shift). No significant inter‐group differences were found for volumetric, aesthetic or <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PROM</jats:styled-content> outcomes. Ultrasonography revealed increased tissue elasticity in treated sites. In contrast, untreated contralateral sites showed progressive gingival recession and increased hypersensitivity (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001).ConclusionBoth <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">VCMX</jats:styled-content> treatments demonstrated stable clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes over 3 years, while untreated sites showed signs of soft‐tissue deterioration.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability of Root Coverage Outcomes After Soft‐Tissue Augmentation With a Collagen Matrix With or Without rhPDGF‐BB: A 3‐Year Triple‐Blinded, Randomised, Placebo‐Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Tavelli, Shayan Barootchi, Maria Vera Rodriguez, Leonardo Mancini, Hamoun Sabri, Tu Nguyen, Jad Majzoub, Suncica Travan, William V. Giannobile\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpe.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimTo evaluate the 3‐year stability of root coverage outcomes following treatment with a coronally advanced flap (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">CAF</jats:styled-content>) and a volume‐stable, cross‐linked xenogeneic collagen matrix (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">VCMX</jats:styled-content>), either soaked in recombinant human platelet–derived growth factor‐<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">BB</jats:styled-content> (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">rhPDGF</jats:styled-content>, test arm) or sterile saline (control arm).MethodsOf the original 30 participants in the triple‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial, 26 were available for follow‐up at 1 and 3 years. The primary outcome was mean root coverage (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">mRC</jats:styled-content>) at 3 years compared to the 6‐month results. Secondary outcomes included complete root coverage, keratinised tissue width, gingival thickness, volumetric and aesthetic changes, patient‐reported outcome measures (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">PROMs</jats:styled-content>) and ultrasonographic tissue properties. Untreated contralateral teeth were also assessed.ResultsFrom 6 months to 3 years, <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">mRC</jats:styled-content> decreased by 6.7% in the control arm and 7.5% in the test arm (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). Over 90% of treated sites maintained a stable gingival margin (≤ 0.5 mm shift). No significant inter‐group differences were found for volumetric, aesthetic or <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">PROM</jats:styled-content> outcomes. Ultrasonography revealed increased tissue elasticity in treated sites. In contrast, untreated contralateral sites showed progressive gingival recession and increased hypersensitivity (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001).ConclusionBoth <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">VCMX</jats:styled-content> treatments demonstrated stable clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes over 3 years, while untreated sites showed signs of soft‐tissue deterioration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70030\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70030","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估冠状进展皮瓣(CAF)和体积稳定的交联异种胶原基质(VCMX)治疗后根部覆盖结果的3年稳定性,分别浸泡在重组人血小板衍生生长因子- BB (rhPDGF,测试组)或无菌生理盐水(对照组)中。方法在最初的30名三盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验的参与者中,有26人在1年和3年随访。主要结果是3年的平均根覆盖(mRC)与6个月的结果的比较。次要结果包括牙根完全覆盖、角化组织宽度、牙龈厚度、体积和美观变化、患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)和超声组织特性。对未治疗的对侧牙齿也进行了评估。结果6个月至3年,对照组mRC下降6.7%,试验组mRC下降7.5% (p > 0.05)。超过90%的治疗部位保持稳定的龈缘(≤0.5 mm移位)。在体积、美观或PROM结果方面,组间无显著差异。超声检查显示治疗部位组织弹性增加。相比之下,未经治疗的对侧部位显示进行性牙龈萎缩和增加的超敏反应(p < 0.001)。结论两种VCMX治疗在3年内均表现出稳定的临床和超声结果,而未治疗的部位出现软组织恶化迹象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability of Root Coverage Outcomes After Soft‐Tissue Augmentation With a Collagen Matrix With or Without rhPDGF‐BB: A 3‐Year Triple‐Blinded, Randomised, Placebo‐Controlled Trial
AimTo evaluate the 3‐year stability of root coverage outcomes following treatment with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) and a volume‐stable, cross‐linked xenogeneic collagen matrix (VCMX), either soaked in recombinant human platelet–derived growth factor‐BB (rhPDGF, test arm) or sterile saline (control arm).MethodsOf the original 30 participants in the triple‐blind, randomised, placebo‐controlled trial, 26 were available for follow‐up at 1 and 3 years. The primary outcome was mean root coverage (mRC) at 3 years compared to the 6‐month results. Secondary outcomes included complete root coverage, keratinised tissue width, gingival thickness, volumetric and aesthetic changes, patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs) and ultrasonographic tissue properties. Untreated contralateral teeth were also assessed.ResultsFrom 6 months to 3 years, mRC decreased by 6.7% in the control arm and 7.5% in the test arm (p > 0.05). Over 90% of treated sites maintained a stable gingival margin (≤ 0.5 mm shift). No significant inter‐group differences were found for volumetric, aesthetic or PROM outcomes. Ultrasonography revealed increased tissue elasticity in treated sites. In contrast, untreated contralateral sites showed progressive gingival recession and increased hypersensitivity (p < 0.001).ConclusionBoth VCMX treatments demonstrated stable clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes over 3 years, while untreated sites showed signs of soft‐tissue deterioration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Journal of Clinical Periodontology 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
10.40%
发文量
175
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology. The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope. The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信