立体定向放射手术和神经根切断术治疗三叉神经痛的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Seyed Farzad Maroufi, Negin Jarrah, Maral Moafi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Hamid Borghei-Razavi, Jason P Sheehan
{"title":"立体定向放射手术和神经根切断术治疗三叉神经痛的比较:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Seyed Farzad Maroufi, Negin Jarrah, Maral Moafi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Hamid Borghei-Razavi, Jason P Sheehan","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03763-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic, debilitating neuropathy characterized by sudden, severe facial pain, often refractory to medical therapy. When medications fail, surgical options such as microvascular decompression (MVD) are preferred, but for patients unsuitable for open surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and percutaneous rhizotomy are viable alternatives. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SRS and rhizotomy in the management of TN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to September 2024 for studies comparing SRS and rhizotomy in TN patients. Eligible studies reported pain relief, recurrence, retreatment rates, or complications. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses for multiple sclerosis (MS) status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies involving 1,251 patients (577 SRS, 674 rhizotomy) were included. Rhizotomy provided superior initial pain-free outcomes (RR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.49 ;0.91, p < 0.01), while SRS showed no significant difference in pain-free rates at the last follow-up (RR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.80 ;1.22, p = 0.89) or overall pain relief (RR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.90 ;1.44, p = 0.29). SRS significantly reduced recurrence (RR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.51 ;0.96, p < 0.05), retreatment need (RR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.46 ;0.96, p < 0.05), and facial numbness (RR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.37 ;0.99, p < 0.05). Overall complications were comparable (RR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.34 ;1.43, p = 0.33), though SRS trended toward fewer complications in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rhizotomy provides immediate pain relief, making it suitable for patients requiring rapid results, while SRS offers greater durability and lower morbidity. Treatment choices should be tailored to patient-specific factors, including the urgency of relief and MS status. Future prospective studies with standardized outcomes and extended follow-up are needed to address the limitations of retrospective data and study heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"613"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368101/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Soltani Khaboushan, Seyed Farzad Maroufi, Negin Jarrah, Maral Moafi, Mohammadmahdi Sabahi, Hamid Borghei-Razavi, Jason P Sheehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03763-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic, debilitating neuropathy characterized by sudden, severe facial pain, often refractory to medical therapy. When medications fail, surgical options such as microvascular decompression (MVD) are preferred, but for patients unsuitable for open surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and percutaneous rhizotomy are viable alternatives. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SRS and rhizotomy in the management of TN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to September 2024 for studies comparing SRS and rhizotomy in TN patients. Eligible studies reported pain relief, recurrence, retreatment rates, or complications. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses for multiple sclerosis (MS) status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen studies involving 1,251 patients (577 SRS, 674 rhizotomy) were included. Rhizotomy provided superior initial pain-free outcomes (RR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.49 ;0.91, p < 0.01), while SRS showed no significant difference in pain-free rates at the last follow-up (RR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.80 ;1.22, p = 0.89) or overall pain relief (RR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.90 ;1.44, p = 0.29). SRS significantly reduced recurrence (RR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.51 ;0.96, p < 0.05), retreatment need (RR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.46 ;0.96, p < 0.05), and facial numbness (RR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.37 ;0.99, p < 0.05). Overall complications were comparable (RR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.34 ;1.43, p = 0.33), though SRS trended toward fewer complications in MS patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rhizotomy provides immediate pain relief, making it suitable for patients requiring rapid results, while SRS offers greater durability and lower morbidity. Treatment choices should be tailored to patient-specific factors, including the urgency of relief and MS status. Future prospective studies with standardized outcomes and extended follow-up are needed to address the limitations of retrospective data and study heterogeneity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12368101/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03763-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03763-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:三叉神经痛(TN)是一种慢性衰弱性神经病变,其特征是突然,严重的面部疼痛,通常难以药物治疗。当药物治疗失败时,首选手术选择,如微血管减压(MVD),但对于不适合开放手术的患者,立体定向放射手术(SRS)和经皮神经根切断术是可行的选择。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在比较SRS和根茎切断术治疗TN的疗效和安全性。方法:按照PRISMA指南,检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science,检索截至2024年9月比较SRS和根茎切断术治疗TN患者的研究。符合条件的研究报告了疼痛缓解、复发、再治疗率或并发症。数据提取和分析采用随机效应模型,并对多发性硬化症(MS)状态进行亚组分析。结果:纳入了15项研究,涉及1,251例患者(577例SRS, 674例根切断术)。结论:根茎切断术可立即缓解疼痛,适用于需要快速疗效的患者,而SRS具有更大的耐久性和更低的发病率。治疗选择应根据患者的具体因素进行调整,包括缓解的紧迫性和MS状态。未来需要标准化结果和延长随访的前瞻性研究来解决回顾性数据和研究异质性的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery and rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a chronic, debilitating neuropathy characterized by sudden, severe facial pain, often refractory to medical therapy. When medications fail, surgical options such as microvascular decompression (MVD) are preferred, but for patients unsuitable for open surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and percutaneous rhizotomy are viable alternatives. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SRS and rhizotomy in the management of TN.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched up to September 2024 for studies comparing SRS and rhizotomy in TN patients. Eligible studies reported pain relief, recurrence, retreatment rates, or complications. Data were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model, with subgroup analyses for multiple sclerosis (MS) status.

Results: Fifteen studies involving 1,251 patients (577 SRS, 674 rhizotomy) were included. Rhizotomy provided superior initial pain-free outcomes (RR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.49 ;0.91, p < 0.01), while SRS showed no significant difference in pain-free rates at the last follow-up (RR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.80 ;1.22, p = 0.89) or overall pain relief (RR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.90 ;1.44, p = 0.29). SRS significantly reduced recurrence (RR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.51 ;0.96, p < 0.05), retreatment need (RR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.46 ;0.96, p < 0.05), and facial numbness (RR = 0.61, 95%CI = 0.37 ;0.99, p < 0.05). Overall complications were comparable (RR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.34 ;1.43, p = 0.33), though SRS trended toward fewer complications in MS patients.

Conclusion: Rhizotomy provides immediate pain relief, making it suitable for patients requiring rapid results, while SRS offers greater durability and lower morbidity. Treatment choices should be tailored to patient-specific factors, including the urgency of relief and MS status. Future prospective studies with standardized outcomes and extended follow-up are needed to address the limitations of retrospective data and study heterogeneity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信