政策科学中的恶性:理论与框架

IF 6.1 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Tim Legrand, M Jae Moon
{"title":"政策科学中的恶性:理论与框架","authors":"Tim Legrand, M Jae Moon","doi":"10.1093/polsoc/puaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article introduces and conceptualizes the notion of malignity in policy sciences, examining how public policies can become misaligned with the public interest—whether by design or through the dynamics of the policy process. The special issue underscores the urgent need to reintegrate normative and ethical considerations into policy design, analysis, and implementation. In the context of democratic backsliding, administrative misuse, and technocratic drift, we call for greater attention to the “dark side” of policymaking, where policies are co-opted and distorted to serve marginal or private interests at the expense of democratic values and public interests. The issue advances a theoretical framework that defines malignity as the intentional diversion of state mechanisms away from the public interest. The contributions explore the features and mechanisms of malign policymaking and offer strategies for identifying, mitigating, and responding to its occurrence.","PeriodicalId":47383,"journal":{"name":"Policy and Society","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malignity in policy sciences: a theory and framework\",\"authors\":\"Tim Legrand, M Jae Moon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/polsoc/puaf016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article introduces and conceptualizes the notion of malignity in policy sciences, examining how public policies can become misaligned with the public interest—whether by design or through the dynamics of the policy process. The special issue underscores the urgent need to reintegrate normative and ethical considerations into policy design, analysis, and implementation. In the context of democratic backsliding, administrative misuse, and technocratic drift, we call for greater attention to the “dark side” of policymaking, where policies are co-opted and distorted to serve marginal or private interests at the expense of democratic values and public interests. The issue advances a theoretical framework that defines malignity as the intentional diversion of state mechanisms away from the public interest. The contributions explore the features and mechanisms of malign policymaking and offer strategies for identifying, mitigating, and responding to its occurrence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47383,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Policy and Society\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Policy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puaf016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍并概念化了政策科学中的恶性概念,研究了公共政策如何与公共利益不一致,无论是通过设计还是通过政策过程的动态。这一特别问题强调迫切需要将规范和伦理考虑重新纳入政策设计、分析和实施。在民主倒退、行政滥用和技术官僚漂变的背景下,我们呼吁更多地关注政策制定的“阴暗面”,即政策被采纳和扭曲,以牺牲民主价值观和公共利益为代价,为边际或私人利益服务。这个问题提出了一个理论框架,将恶意定义为故意将国家机制从公共利益中转移出来。文章探讨了恶性决策的特征和机制,并提出了识别、减轻和应对恶性决策的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Malignity in policy sciences: a theory and framework
This article introduces and conceptualizes the notion of malignity in policy sciences, examining how public policies can become misaligned with the public interest—whether by design or through the dynamics of the policy process. The special issue underscores the urgent need to reintegrate normative and ethical considerations into policy design, analysis, and implementation. In the context of democratic backsliding, administrative misuse, and technocratic drift, we call for greater attention to the “dark side” of policymaking, where policies are co-opted and distorted to serve marginal or private interests at the expense of democratic values and public interests. The issue advances a theoretical framework that defines malignity as the intentional diversion of state mechanisms away from the public interest. The contributions explore the features and mechanisms of malign policymaking and offer strategies for identifying, mitigating, and responding to its occurrence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Policy and Society
Policy and Society Multiple-
CiteScore
18.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
43
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Policy and Society is a prominent international open-access journal publishing peer-reviewed research on critical issues in policy theory and practice across local, national, and international levels. The journal seeks to comprehend the origin, functioning, and implications of policies within broader political, social, and economic contexts. It publishes themed issues regularly and, starting in 2023, will also feature non-themed individual submissions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信