孤独感的心理干预:对近期研究结果的述评及对未来研究的建议

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Milena Imwinkelried, Noëmi Seewer, Tobias Krieger
{"title":"孤独感的心理干预:对近期研究结果的述评及对未来研究的建议","authors":"Milena Imwinkelried,&nbsp;Noëmi Seewer,&nbsp;Tobias Krieger","doi":"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loneliness is a widespread phenomenon with adverse effects on health. Among others, psychological interventions have emerged as promising approaches to alleviate loneliness. This narrative review critically synthesizes recent evidence on the efficacy and mechanisms of psychological interventions for loneliness, structured along Grawe’s stage model of intervention research. While psychological interventions generally show moderate to large effects, substantial heterogeneity, limited evidence on long-term outcomes, and underrepresentation of diverse populations remain challenges. Furthermore, progress in the field is hindered by inconsistent definitions, suboptimal reporting, limited process research, and further methodological challenges. Several key research priorities are proposed for the development, evaluation, and implementation of more effective and sustainable psychological interventions for loneliness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56191,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","volume":"65 ","pages":"Article 101586"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological interventions for loneliness: a narrative review of recent findings and suggestions for future research\",\"authors\":\"Milena Imwinkelried,&nbsp;Noëmi Seewer,&nbsp;Tobias Krieger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cobeha.2025.101586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Loneliness is a widespread phenomenon with adverse effects on health. Among others, psychological interventions have emerged as promising approaches to alleviate loneliness. This narrative review critically synthesizes recent evidence on the efficacy and mechanisms of psychological interventions for loneliness, structured along Grawe’s stage model of intervention research. While psychological interventions generally show moderate to large effects, substantial heterogeneity, limited evidence on long-term outcomes, and underrepresentation of diverse populations remain challenges. Furthermore, progress in the field is hindered by inconsistent definitions, suboptimal reporting, limited process research, and further methodological challenges. Several key research priorities are proposed for the development, evaluation, and implementation of more effective and sustainable psychological interventions for loneliness.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"volume\":\"65 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101586\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154625001056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

孤独是一种普遍存在的现象,对健康有不利影响。其中,心理干预已经成为缓解孤独感的有希望的方法。这篇叙述性综述批判性地综合了最近关于孤独感心理干预的有效性和机制的证据,并根据Grawe的干预研究阶段模型进行了构建。虽然心理干预通常显示出中等到较大的效果,但实质性的异质性、关于长期结果的证据有限以及不同人群的代表性不足仍然是挑战。此外,不一致的定义、次优报告、有限的过程研究和进一步的方法挑战阻碍了该领域的进展。提出了几个关键的研究重点,以开发、评估和实施更有效和可持续的孤独感心理干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological interventions for loneliness: a narrative review of recent findings and suggestions for future research
Loneliness is a widespread phenomenon with adverse effects on health. Among others, psychological interventions have emerged as promising approaches to alleviate loneliness. This narrative review critically synthesizes recent evidence on the efficacy and mechanisms of psychological interventions for loneliness, structured along Grawe’s stage model of intervention research. While psychological interventions generally show moderate to large effects, substantial heterogeneity, limited evidence on long-term outcomes, and underrepresentation of diverse populations remain challenges. Furthermore, progress in the field is hindered by inconsistent definitions, suboptimal reporting, limited process research, and further methodological challenges. Several key research priorities are proposed for the development, evaluation, and implementation of more effective and sustainable psychological interventions for loneliness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences Neuroscience-Cognitive Neuroscience
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
2.00%
发文量
135
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences is a systematic, integrative review journal that provides a unique and educational platform for updates on the expanding volume of information published in the field of behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信