阴影中的手术刀:法国女外科医生失落的历史。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Agathe Yvinou, Romain Alain, Andonirina Rantoanina, Dominique Le Nen
{"title":"阴影中的手术刀:法国女外科医生失落的历史。","authors":"Agathe Yvinou, Romain Alain, Andonirina Rantoanina, Dominique Le Nen","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines the long-standing claim that French surgery was an exclusively male profession from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century. It maps the social, economic, and legal mechanisms that gradually erased women practitioners between the twelfth and eighteenth centuries by analyzing four interlocking source sets: tax registers and guild rolls that record occupational identities; royal ordinances, apprenticeship contracts, and hospital regulations that define professional boundaries; iconographic and epigraphic material that visualizes or names women at work; and contemporary medical treatises that reveal shifting gendered vocabularies. Combining quantitative prosopography with close reading of normative texts, the study traces how craft professionalization, linguistic masculinization, and institutional reforms narrowed women's access to surgical labor. The resulting methodological framework equips historians to detect marginalized healers in archives compiled largely by and for men, and invites a broader, more inclusive rewriting of early-modern surgical history.</p>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"116544"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scalpels in shadow: The lost history of France's female surgeons.\",\"authors\":\"Agathe Yvinou, Romain Alain, Andonirina Rantoanina, Dominique Le Nen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article examines the long-standing claim that French surgery was an exclusively male profession from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century. It maps the social, economic, and legal mechanisms that gradually erased women practitioners between the twelfth and eighteenth centuries by analyzing four interlocking source sets: tax registers and guild rolls that record occupational identities; royal ordinances, apprenticeship contracts, and hospital regulations that define professional boundaries; iconographic and epigraphic material that visualizes or names women at work; and contemporary medical treatises that reveal shifting gendered vocabularies. Combining quantitative prosopography with close reading of normative texts, the study traces how craft professionalization, linguistic masculinization, and institutional reforms narrowed women's access to surgical labor. The resulting methodological framework equips historians to detect marginalized healers in archives compiled largely by and for men, and invites a broader, more inclusive rewriting of early-modern surgical history.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"116544\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2025.116544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章考察了一个长期存在的说法,即从中世纪到19世纪,法国外科手术是男性的专属职业。它通过分析四个相互关联的来源集,描绘了在12世纪到18世纪之间逐渐消除女性从业者的社会、经济和法律机制:记录职业身份的税务登记簿和行会名册;规定职业界限的皇家条例、学徒合同和医院条例;将工作中的女性形象化或命名的图像和铭文材料;当代医学论文揭示了性别词汇的变化。结合定量体位学和对规范文本的仔细阅读,该研究追溯了工艺专业化、语言男性化和制度改革如何缩小了女性获得手术劳动的机会。由此产生的方法论框架使历史学家能够在主要由男性编写并为男性编写的档案中发现边缘化的治疗师,并邀请对早期现代外科历史进行更广泛,更具包容性的重写。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scalpels in shadow: The lost history of France's female surgeons.

This article examines the long-standing claim that French surgery was an exclusively male profession from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century. It maps the social, economic, and legal mechanisms that gradually erased women practitioners between the twelfth and eighteenth centuries by analyzing four interlocking source sets: tax registers and guild rolls that record occupational identities; royal ordinances, apprenticeship contracts, and hospital regulations that define professional boundaries; iconographic and epigraphic material that visualizes or names women at work; and contemporary medical treatises that reveal shifting gendered vocabularies. Combining quantitative prosopography with close reading of normative texts, the study traces how craft professionalization, linguistic masculinization, and institutional reforms narrowed women's access to surgical labor. The resulting methodological framework equips historians to detect marginalized healers in archives compiled largely by and for men, and invites a broader, more inclusive rewriting of early-modern surgical history.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信