单钉自然孔标本提取术在直肠癌中的应用。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yanle Fang, Hongxun Ruan, Xiaoning Qin, Lin Lin
{"title":"单钉自然孔标本提取术在直肠癌中的应用。","authors":"Yanle Fang, Hongxun Ruan, Xiaoning Qin, Lin Lin","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the outcomes of single stapling natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (ssNOSES) with double stapling natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (dsNOSES) in anterior resection for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients with rectal cancer were selected from the Colorectal Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. These patients underwent Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) between July 2018 and July 2020. Fifty patients who underwent ssNOSES were compared with fifty patients who underwent dsNOSES. The comparison focused on patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and complications, with a particular emphasis on operative time, cost, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four cases of anastomotic leakage were observed in the dsNOSES group, and this group also incurred higher costs. Although the surgical time for ssNOSES was longer, the procedure was associated with lower costs and no cases of anastomotic leakage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ssNOSES is a cost-effective and safer alternative to dsNOSES. Furthermore, the surgical time for ssNOSES can be reduced through training and experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Single Stapling Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (ssNOSES) in Rectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yanle Fang, Hongxun Ruan, Xiaoning Qin, Lin Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001398\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the outcomes of single stapling natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (ssNOSES) with double stapling natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (dsNOSES) in anterior resection for rectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients with rectal cancer were selected from the Colorectal Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. These patients underwent Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) between July 2018 and July 2020. Fifty patients who underwent ssNOSES were compared with fifty patients who underwent dsNOSES. The comparison focused on patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and complications, with a particular emphasis on operative time, cost, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four cases of anastomotic leakage were observed in the dsNOSES group, and this group also incurred higher costs. Although the surgical time for ssNOSES was longer, the procedure was associated with lower costs and no cases of anastomotic leakage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ssNOSES is a cost-effective and safer alternative to dsNOSES. Furthermore, the surgical time for ssNOSES can be reduced through training and experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001398\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001398","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较单吻合器自然口标本提取术(ss鼻)与双吻合器自然口标本提取术(dsNOSES)在直肠癌前切除术中的效果。方法:选取河北医科大学第二医院结直肠科收治的100例直肠癌患者。这些患者在2018年7月至2020年7月期间接受了自然孔标本提取手术(nose)。将50例鼻塞患者与50例无鼻塞患者进行比较。比较的重点是患者人口统计学、手术结果和并发症,特别强调手术时间、费用和并发症。结果:dsNOSES组出现吻合口瘘4例,费用较高。虽然手术时间较长,但手术费用较低,无吻合口漏病例。结论:ssnose是一种经济、安全的替代方法。此外,通过培训和经验积累,可以缩短鼻塞手术时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Single Stapling Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (ssNOSES) in Rectal Cancer.

Objective: This study aims to compare the outcomes of single stapling natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (ssNOSES) with double stapling natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (dsNOSES) in anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Methods: A total of 100 patients with rectal cancer were selected from the Colorectal Department of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University. These patients underwent Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) between July 2018 and July 2020. Fifty patients who underwent ssNOSES were compared with fifty patients who underwent dsNOSES. The comparison focused on patient demographics, surgical outcomes, and complications, with a particular emphasis on operative time, cost, and complications.

Results: Four cases of anastomotic leakage were observed in the dsNOSES group, and this group also incurred higher costs. Although the surgical time for ssNOSES was longer, the procedure was associated with lower costs and no cases of anastomotic leakage.

Conclusions: ssNOSES is a cost-effective and safer alternative to dsNOSES. Furthermore, the surgical time for ssNOSES can be reduced through training and experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信