腰前斜椎体间融合术(OLIF)在L5/S1节段的可行性——影像学和临床研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pengchao Yang, Yimin Dong, Pengju Wang, Yong Xu, Honglei Kang, Feng Li, Hanfeng Guan
{"title":"腰前斜椎体间融合术(OLIF)在L5/S1节段的可行性——影像学和临床研究","authors":"Pengchao Yang, Yimin Dong, Pengju Wang, Yong Xu, Honglei Kang, Feng Li, Hanfeng Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical study with prospective data collection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of prepsoas OLIF at L5-S1 level and propose a new practical framework for approach selection of OLIF51.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The feasibility of left-sided and right-sided prepsoas approaches was graded as easy, advanced and difficult depending on retraction distance (RD) and perivascular adipose tissue (PAT) in the radiographic study. The classification results were summarized and the OLIF51 approach selection framework was proposed to guide the subsequent clinical research. The clinical outcomes and incidence of complications were compared between two groups in which the inpatients underwent OLIF51 from 2019 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 200 consecutive randomized outpatients who met the inclusion criteria, the easy, advanced and difficult cases of left-sided prepsoas were 19, 158 and 23 respectively with right-sided prepsoas (40, 160, 0). Guided by the proposed framework, 65 inpatients underwent left-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group A and 71 inpatients underwent right-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group B. There was no significant difference in demographic and preoperative follow-up results. The ORT for OLIF51 alone was shorter in group B than group A. Operations were successfully completed in all patients of group B. In group A, sufficient exposure was not achieved in four patients(6.2%). Ligation of the iliolumbar vein was needed for adequate exposure in 16(24.6%) patients from group A and 14(19.7%) from group B. Postoperative clinical outcomes were improved and not significantly different between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prepsoas OLIF51 is feasible, which can serve as alternative approaches for anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1 according to preoperative imaging evaluation. Although there is no difference in the therapeutic effect between two groups, the right-sided prepsoas approach was preferred with its greater feasibility and advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The feasibility of prepsoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 level --- a radiographic and clinical research.\",\"authors\":\"Pengchao Yang, Yimin Dong, Pengju Wang, Yong Xu, Honglei Kang, Feng Li, Hanfeng Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical study with prospective data collection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of prepsoas OLIF at L5-S1 level and propose a new practical framework for approach selection of OLIF51.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The feasibility of left-sided and right-sided prepsoas approaches was graded as easy, advanced and difficult depending on retraction distance (RD) and perivascular adipose tissue (PAT) in the radiographic study. The classification results were summarized and the OLIF51 approach selection framework was proposed to guide the subsequent clinical research. The clinical outcomes and incidence of complications were compared between two groups in which the inpatients underwent OLIF51 from 2019 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 200 consecutive randomized outpatients who met the inclusion criteria, the easy, advanced and difficult cases of left-sided prepsoas were 19, 158 and 23 respectively with right-sided prepsoas (40, 160, 0). Guided by the proposed framework, 65 inpatients underwent left-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group A and 71 inpatients underwent right-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group B. There was no significant difference in demographic and preoperative follow-up results. The ORT for OLIF51 alone was shorter in group B than group A. Operations were successfully completed in all patients of group B. In group A, sufficient exposure was not achieved in four patients(6.2%). Ligation of the iliolumbar vein was needed for adequate exposure in 16(24.6%) patients from group A and 14(19.7%) from group B. Postoperative clinical outcomes were improved and not significantly different between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prepsoas OLIF51 is feasible, which can serve as alternative approaches for anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1 according to preoperative imaging evaluation. Although there is no difference in the therapeutic effect between two groups, the right-sided prepsoas approach was preferred with its greater feasibility and advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:前瞻性资料收集的回顾性临床研究。目的:探讨腰骶前L5-S1水平OLIF的可行性,为OLIF51入路选择提供一个新的实用框架。方法:根据牵回距离(RD)和血管周围脂肪组织(PAT)的影像学检查,将左右侧腰肌前入路的可行性分为简单、高级和困难三个等级。总结分类结果,提出OLIF51方法选择框架,指导后续临床研究。比较2019 - 2022年两组住院患者行OLIF51的临床结局和并发症发生率。结果:在连续200例符合纳入标准的随机门诊患者中,左侧腰前肌易、晚期和困难分别为19例、158例和23例(40例、160例、0例)。在提出的框架指导下,A组65例左侧腰大肌前切除术患者入组,b组71例右侧腰大肌前切除术患者入组,人口统计学和术前随访结果无显著差异。B组单独使用OLIF51的ORT时间比A组短。B组所有患者均成功完成手术。在A组,4例患者(6.2%)未达到充分暴露。A组16例(24.6%)患者和b组14例(19.7%)患者需要结扎髂腰静脉以充分暴露。术后临床结果得到改善,两组之间无显著差异。结论:腰前路OLIF51是可行的,根据术前影像学评价可作为L5-S1前路椎间融合术的替代入路。虽然两组治疗效果无差异,但右侧腰肌前入路更具可行性和优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The feasibility of prepsoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 level --- a radiographic and clinical research.

Study design: Retrospective clinical study with prospective data collection.

Objective: To investigate the feasibility of prepsoas OLIF at L5-S1 level and propose a new practical framework for approach selection of OLIF51.

Methods: The feasibility of left-sided and right-sided prepsoas approaches was graded as easy, advanced and difficult depending on retraction distance (RD) and perivascular adipose tissue (PAT) in the radiographic study. The classification results were summarized and the OLIF51 approach selection framework was proposed to guide the subsequent clinical research. The clinical outcomes and incidence of complications were compared between two groups in which the inpatients underwent OLIF51 from 2019 to 2022.

Results: Among the 200 consecutive randomized outpatients who met the inclusion criteria, the easy, advanced and difficult cases of left-sided prepsoas were 19, 158 and 23 respectively with right-sided prepsoas (40, 160, 0). Guided by the proposed framework, 65 inpatients underwent left-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group A and 71 inpatients underwent right-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group B. There was no significant difference in demographic and preoperative follow-up results. The ORT for OLIF51 alone was shorter in group B than group A. Operations were successfully completed in all patients of group B. In group A, sufficient exposure was not achieved in four patients(6.2%). Ligation of the iliolumbar vein was needed for adequate exposure in 16(24.6%) patients from group A and 14(19.7%) from group B. Postoperative clinical outcomes were improved and not significantly different between two groups.

Conclusion: Prepsoas OLIF51 is feasible, which can serve as alternative approaches for anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1 according to preoperative imaging evaluation. Although there is no difference in the therapeutic effect between two groups, the right-sided prepsoas approach was preferred with its greater feasibility and advantages.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World neurosurgery
World neurosurgery CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
1765
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal''s mission is to: -To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care. -To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide. -To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients. Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信