{"title":"腰前斜椎体间融合术(OLIF)在L5/S1节段的可行性——影像学和临床研究","authors":"Pengchao Yang, Yimin Dong, Pengju Wang, Yong Xu, Honglei Kang, Feng Li, Hanfeng Guan","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical study with prospective data collection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of prepsoas OLIF at L5-S1 level and propose a new practical framework for approach selection of OLIF51.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The feasibility of left-sided and right-sided prepsoas approaches was graded as easy, advanced and difficult depending on retraction distance (RD) and perivascular adipose tissue (PAT) in the radiographic study. The classification results were summarized and the OLIF51 approach selection framework was proposed to guide the subsequent clinical research. The clinical outcomes and incidence of complications were compared between two groups in which the inpatients underwent OLIF51 from 2019 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 200 consecutive randomized outpatients who met the inclusion criteria, the easy, advanced and difficult cases of left-sided prepsoas were 19, 158 and 23 respectively with right-sided prepsoas (40, 160, 0). Guided by the proposed framework, 65 inpatients underwent left-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group A and 71 inpatients underwent right-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group B. There was no significant difference in demographic and preoperative follow-up results. The ORT for OLIF51 alone was shorter in group B than group A. Operations were successfully completed in all patients of group B. In group A, sufficient exposure was not achieved in four patients(6.2%). Ligation of the iliolumbar vein was needed for adequate exposure in 16(24.6%) patients from group A and 14(19.7%) from group B. Postoperative clinical outcomes were improved and not significantly different between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prepsoas OLIF51 is feasible, which can serve as alternative approaches for anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1 according to preoperative imaging evaluation. Although there is no difference in the therapeutic effect between two groups, the right-sided prepsoas approach was preferred with its greater feasibility and advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"124294"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The feasibility of prepsoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 level --- a radiographic and clinical research.\",\"authors\":\"Pengchao Yang, Yimin Dong, Pengju Wang, Yong Xu, Honglei Kang, Feng Li, Hanfeng Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective clinical study with prospective data collection.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the feasibility of prepsoas OLIF at L5-S1 level and propose a new practical framework for approach selection of OLIF51.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The feasibility of left-sided and right-sided prepsoas approaches was graded as easy, advanced and difficult depending on retraction distance (RD) and perivascular adipose tissue (PAT) in the radiographic study. The classification results were summarized and the OLIF51 approach selection framework was proposed to guide the subsequent clinical research. The clinical outcomes and incidence of complications were compared between two groups in which the inpatients underwent OLIF51 from 2019 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 200 consecutive randomized outpatients who met the inclusion criteria, the easy, advanced and difficult cases of left-sided prepsoas were 19, 158 and 23 respectively with right-sided prepsoas (40, 160, 0). Guided by the proposed framework, 65 inpatients underwent left-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group A and 71 inpatients underwent right-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group B. There was no significant difference in demographic and preoperative follow-up results. The ORT for OLIF51 alone was shorter in group B than group A. Operations were successfully completed in all patients of group B. In group A, sufficient exposure was not achieved in four patients(6.2%). Ligation of the iliolumbar vein was needed for adequate exposure in 16(24.6%) patients from group A and 14(19.7%) from group B. Postoperative clinical outcomes were improved and not significantly different between two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prepsoas OLIF51 is feasible, which can serve as alternative approaches for anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1 according to preoperative imaging evaluation. Although there is no difference in the therapeutic effect between two groups, the right-sided prepsoas approach was preferred with its greater feasibility and advantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"124294\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124294","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The feasibility of prepsoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at L5/S1 level --- a radiographic and clinical research.
Study design: Retrospective clinical study with prospective data collection.
Objective: To investigate the feasibility of prepsoas OLIF at L5-S1 level and propose a new practical framework for approach selection of OLIF51.
Methods: The feasibility of left-sided and right-sided prepsoas approaches was graded as easy, advanced and difficult depending on retraction distance (RD) and perivascular adipose tissue (PAT) in the radiographic study. The classification results were summarized and the OLIF51 approach selection framework was proposed to guide the subsequent clinical research. The clinical outcomes and incidence of complications were compared between two groups in which the inpatients underwent OLIF51 from 2019 to 2022.
Results: Among the 200 consecutive randomized outpatients who met the inclusion criteria, the easy, advanced and difficult cases of left-sided prepsoas were 19, 158 and 23 respectively with right-sided prepsoas (40, 160, 0). Guided by the proposed framework, 65 inpatients underwent left-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group A and 71 inpatients underwent right-sided prepsoas OLIF51 were enrolled in group B. There was no significant difference in demographic and preoperative follow-up results. The ORT for OLIF51 alone was shorter in group B than group A. Operations were successfully completed in all patients of group B. In group A, sufficient exposure was not achieved in four patients(6.2%). Ligation of the iliolumbar vein was needed for adequate exposure in 16(24.6%) patients from group A and 14(19.7%) from group B. Postoperative clinical outcomes were improved and not significantly different between two groups.
Conclusion: Prepsoas OLIF51 is feasible, which can serve as alternative approaches for anterior interbody fusion of L5-S1 according to preoperative imaging evaluation. Although there is no difference in the therapeutic effect between two groups, the right-sided prepsoas approach was preferred with its greater feasibility and advantages.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS