内镜下无带蒂大结肠息肉切除术后复发的预防与治疗。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Samantha Pang, Pedram Tavakoli, Neal Shahidi
{"title":"内镜下无带蒂大结肠息肉切除术后复发的预防与治疗。","authors":"Samantha Pang, Pedram Tavakoli, Neal Shahidi","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques are the recommended first-line treatment strategy for the majority of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as a predominant resection modality due to its efficacy, efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness. A limitation of EMR is recurrence, which has historically occurred in 15%-20% of lesions. In the past 10 years, a number of effective mitigating strategies have been developed, including margin thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation, argon plasma coagulation (APC), and hybrid-APC, alongside margin marking pre-resection. Moreover, techniques for effective recurrence management have also been developed. Herein, we appraise existing evidence on the frequency of recurrence, reasonings behind recurrence formation, as well as recurrence mitigating strategies and the effectiveness of recurrence management.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 7","pages":"107746"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevention and treatment of recurrence after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Pang, Pedram Tavakoli, Neal Shahidi\",\"doi\":\"10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques are the recommended first-line treatment strategy for the majority of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as a predominant resection modality due to its efficacy, efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness. A limitation of EMR is recurrence, which has historically occurred in 15%-20% of lesions. In the past 10 years, a number of effective mitigating strategies have been developed, including margin thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation, argon plasma coagulation (APC), and hybrid-APC, alongside margin marking pre-resection. Moreover, techniques for effective recurrence management have also been developed. Herein, we appraise existing evidence on the frequency of recurrence, reasonings behind recurrence formation, as well as recurrence mitigating strategies and the effectiveness of recurrence management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"107746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264792/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微创内镜切除技术是大多数大型非带蒂结肠直肠息肉推荐的一线治疗策略,内镜粘膜切除术(EMR)因其疗效、效率、安全性和成本效益而成为主要的切除方式。EMR的局限性是复发,历史上发生在15%-20%的病变中。在过去的10年里,已经开发了许多有效的缓解策略,包括使用陷阱尖端软凝固的边缘热消融,氩等离子体凝固(APC)和混合APC,以及边缘标记预先切除。此外,还开发了有效的复发管理技术。在此,我们评估现有证据的复发频率,复发形成背后的原因,以及复发缓解策略和复发管理的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevention and treatment of recurrence after endoscopic resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.

Minimally invasive endoscopic resection techniques are the recommended first-line treatment strategy for the majority of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps, with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as a predominant resection modality due to its efficacy, efficiency, safety, and cost-effectiveness. A limitation of EMR is recurrence, which has historically occurred in 15%-20% of lesions. In the past 10 years, a number of effective mitigating strategies have been developed, including margin thermal ablation using snare-tip soft coagulation, argon plasma coagulation (APC), and hybrid-APC, alongside margin marking pre-resection. Moreover, techniques for effective recurrence management have also been developed. Herein, we appraise existing evidence on the frequency of recurrence, reasonings behind recurrence formation, as well as recurrence mitigating strategies and the effectiveness of recurrence management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信