内镜超声在胆道狭窄治疗中的作用:荟萃分析和系统回顾。

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Eyad Gadour, Bogdan Miutescu, Hussein H Okasha, Mohammed Albeshir, Turki Alamri, Elsayed Ghoneem, Călin Burciu, Alexandru Popa, Oana Koppandi, Mohammed S AlQahtani
{"title":"内镜超声在胆道狭窄治疗中的作用:荟萃分析和系统回顾。","authors":"Eyad Gadour, Bogdan Miutescu, Hussein H Okasha, Mohammed Albeshir, Turki Alamri, Elsayed Ghoneem, Călin Burciu, Alexandru Popa, Oana Koppandi, Mohammed S AlQahtani","doi":"10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a management technique for various gastroenterological conditions, including biliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarize the current evidence on EUS's role in diagnosing and managing biliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers searched five electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and EMBASE) for articles published up to January 2025. Included articles met specific criteria, and statistical software was used to analyze reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 935 articles, 19 met the inclusion criteria. Ten articles focused on diagnostic EUS, while nine focused on EUS-guided therapeutic interventions. EUS fine-needle aspiration demonstrated superior sensitivity [0.43-1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-1.00] compared to conventional techniques (0.36-0.96; 95%CI: 0.19-0.99) for diagnosing malignant biliary strictures. Both EUS-fine-needle aspiration and conventional methods exhibited high specificity, with most achieving 100% specificity. EUS-guided interventions showed significantly higher clinical success rates than control interventions (odds ratio = 2.89; 95%CI: 1.22-6.84; <i>P</i> = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in technical success rates (odds ratio = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.30-3.16; <i>P</i> = 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS is a promising tool for diagnosing and managing biliary strictures. Combining EUS-guided and conventional interventions improves diagnostic performance. Further research is needed to investigate the feasibility and use of EUS-guided interventions in this field.</p>","PeriodicalId":23953,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 7","pages":"108541"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolving role of endoscopic ultrasound in biliary stricture management: A meta-analysis and systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Eyad Gadour, Bogdan Miutescu, Hussein H Okasha, Mohammed Albeshir, Turki Alamri, Elsayed Ghoneem, Călin Burciu, Alexandru Popa, Oana Koppandi, Mohammed S AlQahtani\",\"doi\":\"10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a management technique for various gastroenterological conditions, including biliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To summarize the current evidence on EUS's role in diagnosing and managing biliary strictures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent reviewers searched five electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and EMBASE) for articles published up to January 2025. Included articles met specific criteria, and statistical software was used to analyze reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 935 articles, 19 met the inclusion criteria. Ten articles focused on diagnostic EUS, while nine focused on EUS-guided therapeutic interventions. EUS fine-needle aspiration demonstrated superior sensitivity [0.43-1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-1.00] compared to conventional techniques (0.36-0.96; 95%CI: 0.19-0.99) for diagnosing malignant biliary strictures. Both EUS-fine-needle aspiration and conventional methods exhibited high specificity, with most achieving 100% specificity. EUS-guided interventions showed significantly higher clinical success rates than control interventions (odds ratio = 2.89; 95%CI: 1.22-6.84; <i>P</i> = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in technical success rates (odds ratio = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.30-3.16; <i>P</i> = 0.96).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EUS is a promising tool for diagnosing and managing biliary strictures. Combining EUS-guided and conventional interventions improves diagnostic performance. Further research is needed to investigate the feasibility and use of EUS-guided interventions in this field.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"17 7\",\"pages\":\"108541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12264785/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜超声(EUS)已经从一种诊断工具发展成为一种治疗各种胃肠疾病的技术,包括胆道狭窄。目的:总结EUS在胆道狭窄诊断和治疗中的作用。方法:两位独立审稿人检索了5个电子数据库(PubMed、CENTRAL、Science Direct、谷歌Scholar和EMBASE),检索截至2025年1月发表的文章。纳入的文章符合特定的标准,并使用统计软件分析报告的结果。结果:935篇文献中有19篇符合纳入标准。10篇文章聚焦于诊断性EUS, 9篇聚焦于EUS引导的治疗干预。EUS细针抽吸灵敏度高[0.43-1.00];95%置信区间(CI): 0.24-1.00]与传统技术相比(0.36-0.96;95%CI: 0.19-0.99)用于诊断恶性胆道狭窄。eus细针抽吸和常规方法均具有较高的特异性,大多数方法的特异性达到100%。eus引导干预的临床成功率显著高于对照干预(优势比= 2.89;95%置信区间:1.22—-6.84;P = 0.02)。技术成功率差异无统计学意义(优势比= 0.97;95%置信区间:0.30—-3.16;P = 0.96)。结论:EUS是诊断和治疗胆道狭窄的有效工具。eus引导与常规干预相结合可提高诊断效果。需要进一步研究eus引导干预在该领域的可行性和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evolving role of endoscopic ultrasound in biliary stricture management: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a management technique for various gastroenterological conditions, including biliary strictures.

Aim: To summarize the current evidence on EUS's role in diagnosing and managing biliary strictures.

Methods: Two independent reviewers searched five electronic databases (PubMed, CENTRAL, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and EMBASE) for articles published up to January 2025. Included articles met specific criteria, and statistical software was used to analyze reported outcomes.

Results: Of 935 articles, 19 met the inclusion criteria. Ten articles focused on diagnostic EUS, while nine focused on EUS-guided therapeutic interventions. EUS fine-needle aspiration demonstrated superior sensitivity [0.43-1.00; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24-1.00] compared to conventional techniques (0.36-0.96; 95%CI: 0.19-0.99) for diagnosing malignant biliary strictures. Both EUS-fine-needle aspiration and conventional methods exhibited high specificity, with most achieving 100% specificity. EUS-guided interventions showed significantly higher clinical success rates than control interventions (odds ratio = 2.89; 95%CI: 1.22-6.84; P = 0.02). No significant difference was observed in technical success rates (odds ratio = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.30-3.16; P = 0.96).

Conclusion: EUS is a promising tool for diagnosing and managing biliary strictures. Combining EUS-guided and conventional interventions improves diagnostic performance. Further research is needed to investigate the feasibility and use of EUS-guided interventions in this field.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
自引率
5.00%
发文量
1164
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信