癫痫患者抗癫痫药物反应的性别差异:系统综述。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Loretta Giuliano, Elena Zambrelli, Vania Durante, Giulia Battaglia, Bruna Nucera, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Irene Pappalardo, Federica Ranzato, Emanuele Cerulli Irelli, Barbara Mostacci
{"title":"癫痫患者抗癫痫药物反应的性别差异:系统综述。","authors":"Loretta Giuliano, Elena Zambrelli, Vania Durante, Giulia Battaglia, Bruna Nucera, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Irene Pappalardo, Federica Ranzato, Emanuele Cerulli Irelli, Barbara Mostacci","doi":"10.1007/s00415-025-13250-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As a part of a wider project aimed to assess sex-related differences in adverse effects and efficacy of antiseizure medications (ASMs), we performed a systematic review focusing on differences in response to ASMs between males and females with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database. The search was conducted without restriction on publication date, and all results up to September 2022 were included. We included all the articles written in English, Italian, Spanish, or French language evaluating the response to ASMs in people with epilepsy (PWE), with specific mention of the two sexes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Jadad Scale were used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1778 studies were identified. Of these, 60 studies searched for sex differences and among those, 46 (76%) did not identify statistically significant differences. Only 14 studies (23%) identified sex as a statistically significant variable in ASM efficacy. Among those, a greater number of studies reported higher rates of seizure reduction or seizure freedom in males using different ASMs, with 9 studies vs 5 in which drug response was higher in males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study has identified male sex as a predictor of drug response in epilepsy in the majority of studies that found sex differences. However, the scarcity of data found in the literature highlights the need for a systematic evaluation of sex as a variable influencing the response to medications in clinical research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology","volume":"272 8","pages":"518"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex differences in antiseizure medications response in people with epilepsy: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Loretta Giuliano, Elena Zambrelli, Vania Durante, Giulia Battaglia, Bruna Nucera, Vincenzo Mastrangelo, Irene Pappalardo, Federica Ranzato, Emanuele Cerulli Irelli, Barbara Mostacci\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00415-025-13250-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>As a part of a wider project aimed to assess sex-related differences in adverse effects and efficacy of antiseizure medications (ASMs), we performed a systematic review focusing on differences in response to ASMs between males and females with epilepsy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database. The search was conducted without restriction on publication date, and all results up to September 2022 were included. We included all the articles written in English, Italian, Spanish, or French language evaluating the response to ASMs in people with epilepsy (PWE), with specific mention of the two sexes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Jadad Scale were used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1778 studies were identified. Of these, 60 studies searched for sex differences and among those, 46 (76%) did not identify statistically significant differences. Only 14 studies (23%) identified sex as a statistically significant variable in ASM efficacy. Among those, a greater number of studies reported higher rates of seizure reduction or seizure freedom in males using different ASMs, with 9 studies vs 5 in which drug response was higher in males.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study has identified male sex as a predictor of drug response in epilepsy in the majority of studies that found sex differences. However, the scarcity of data found in the literature highlights the need for a systematic evaluation of sex as a variable influencing the response to medications in clinical research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16558,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"volume\":\"272 8\",\"pages\":\"518\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13250-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-025-13250-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:作为一项更广泛的项目的一部分,旨在评估抗癫痫药物(asm)的不良反应和疗效的性别相关差异,我们对癫痫患者对asm的反应差异进行了系统回顾。方法:在PubMed数据库中进行全面的文献检索。检索不受发表日期限制,纳入截至2022年9月的所有结果。我们纳入了所有用英语、意大利语、西班牙语或法语撰写的评估癫痫患者(PWE)对asm反应的文章,并特别提到了两性。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和Jadad量表评估研究质量。结果:共纳入1778项研究。在这些研究中,有60项研究寻找性别差异,其中46项(76%)没有发现统计学上显著的差异。只有14项研究(23%)将性别确定为ASM疗效的统计学显著变量。其中,更多的研究报告了使用不同asm的男性癫痫发作减少率或癫痫发作自由率更高,其中9项研究比5项研究的药物反应在男性中更高。结论:我们的研究发现,在大多数发现性别差异的研究中,男性是癫痫药物反应的预测因子。然而,在文献中发现的数据的稀缺性突出了在临床研究中将性别作为影响药物反应的变量进行系统评估的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex differences in antiseizure medications response in people with epilepsy: a systematic review.

Purpose: As a part of a wider project aimed to assess sex-related differences in adverse effects and efficacy of antiseizure medications (ASMs), we performed a systematic review focusing on differences in response to ASMs between males and females with epilepsy.

Method: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database. The search was conducted without restriction on publication date, and all results up to September 2022 were included. We included all the articles written in English, Italian, Spanish, or French language evaluating the response to ASMs in people with epilepsy (PWE), with specific mention of the two sexes. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Jadad Scale were used to assess study quality.

Results: A total of 1778 studies were identified. Of these, 60 studies searched for sex differences and among those, 46 (76%) did not identify statistically significant differences. Only 14 studies (23%) identified sex as a statistically significant variable in ASM efficacy. Among those, a greater number of studies reported higher rates of seizure reduction or seizure freedom in males using different ASMs, with 9 studies vs 5 in which drug response was higher in males.

Conclusions: Our study has identified male sex as a predictor of drug response in epilepsy in the majority of studies that found sex differences. However, the scarcity of data found in the literature highlights the need for a systematic evaluation of sex as a variable influencing the response to medications in clinical research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurology
Journal of Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
558
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal which provides a source for publishing original communications and reviews on clinical neurology covering the whole field. In addition, Letters to the Editors serve as a forum for clinical cases and the exchange of ideas which highlight important new findings. A section on Neurological progress serves to summarise the major findings in certain fields of neurology. Commentaries on new developments in clinical neuroscience, which may be commissioned or submitted, are published as editorials. Every neurologist interested in the current diagnosis and treatment of neurological disorders needs access to the information contained in this valuable journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信