基于mri的评估骨性颈神经间孔狭窄(OCNFS)使用快速场回波类似于限制回波间隔的CT(骨折)。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dejun She, Dongmei Jiang, Junhuan Hong, Yuwei Pan, Xiang Lin, Weilin Huang, Xiaojun Lin, Peiying You, Xiance Zhao, Ruiquan Chen, Dairong Cao
{"title":"基于mri的评估骨性颈神经间孔狭窄(OCNFS)使用快速场回波类似于限制回波间隔的CT(骨折)。","authors":"Dejun She, Dongmei Jiang, Junhuan Hong, Yuwei Pan, Xiang Lin, Weilin Huang, Xiaojun Lin, Peiying You, Xiance Zhao, Ruiquan Chen, Dairong Cao","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09112-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the feasibility of fast-field-echo resembling CT using restricted echo-spacing (FRACTURE) for evaluating osseous cervical neural foraminal stenosis (OCNFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 280 cervical foramina from 28 patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR) were analyzed on oblique sagittal CT, FRACTURE, T1WI, and T2WI from bilateral C2/3 to C6/7 segments by three readers. CT served as the reference standard to identify OCNFS. Detection rate and grade of OCNFS were assessed. OCNFS severity was classified into four grades according to Park's system: Grade 0 (no stenosis), Grade 1 (mild stenosis), Grade 2 (moderate stenosis), and Grade 3 (severe stenosis). Inter-modality agreements of OCNFS grade were evaluated using linear weighted Cohen's kappa (κ). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to compare diagnostic performance between FRACTURE and conventional MRI for the diagnosis of OCNFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-modality agreement of OCNFS grade was substantial between CT and FRACTURE (κ = 0.689-0.715), and moderate between CT and T1WI (κ = 0.427-0.594) or T2WI (κ = 0.462-0.604). Among the 280 cervical neural foramina, 104 were diagnosed as OCNFS using CT. Detection rate of OCNFS was 96.15% (100/104) for FRACTURE, 76.92% (80/104) for T1WI, and 95.19% (99/104) for T2WI. FRACTURE achieved a sensitivity of 96.2% and a specificity of 97.2% for detecting OCNFS. T1WI demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 85.2%, while T2WI exhibited a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 73.9% for detecting OCNFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FRACTURE can provide a reliable alternative to CT for evaluating OCNFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MR-based evaluation of osseous cervical neural foraminal stenosis (OCNFS) using fast-field-echo resembling CT using restricted echo-spacing (FRACTURE).\",\"authors\":\"Dejun She, Dongmei Jiang, Junhuan Hong, Yuwei Pan, Xiang Lin, Weilin Huang, Xiaojun Lin, Peiying You, Xiance Zhao, Ruiquan Chen, Dairong Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-025-09112-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to assess the feasibility of fast-field-echo resembling CT using restricted echo-spacing (FRACTURE) for evaluating osseous cervical neural foraminal stenosis (OCNFS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 280 cervical foramina from 28 patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR) were analyzed on oblique sagittal CT, FRACTURE, T1WI, and T2WI from bilateral C2/3 to C6/7 segments by three readers. CT served as the reference standard to identify OCNFS. Detection rate and grade of OCNFS were assessed. OCNFS severity was classified into four grades according to Park's system: Grade 0 (no stenosis), Grade 1 (mild stenosis), Grade 2 (moderate stenosis), and Grade 3 (severe stenosis). Inter-modality agreements of OCNFS grade were evaluated using linear weighted Cohen's kappa (κ). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to compare diagnostic performance between FRACTURE and conventional MRI for the diagnosis of OCNFS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The inter-modality agreement of OCNFS grade was substantial between CT and FRACTURE (κ = 0.689-0.715), and moderate between CT and T1WI (κ = 0.427-0.594) or T2WI (κ = 0.462-0.604). Among the 280 cervical neural foramina, 104 were diagnosed as OCNFS using CT. Detection rate of OCNFS was 96.15% (100/104) for FRACTURE, 76.92% (80/104) for T1WI, and 95.19% (99/104) for T2WI. FRACTURE achieved a sensitivity of 96.2% and a specificity of 97.2% for detecting OCNFS. T1WI demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 85.2%, while T2WI exhibited a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 73.9% for detecting OCNFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FRACTURE can provide a reliable alternative to CT for evaluating OCNFS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09112-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09112-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估使用有限回声间隔(骨折)的类似CT的快速场回波评估骨性颈神经间孔狭窄(OCNFS)的可行性。方法:对28例颈椎神经根病(CR)患者的280个颈椎孔进行斜矢状位CT、骨折、T1WI和T2WI扫描,从双侧C2/3至C6/7节段进行分析。CT作为鉴别OCNFS的参考标准。评估OCNFS的检出率和分级。OCNFS的严重程度按照朴氏标准分为0级(无狭窄)、1级(轻度狭窄)、2级(中度狭窄)、3级(严重狭窄)等4个等级。采用线性加权Cohen’s kappa (κ)评价OCNFS分级的多模式一致性。计算敏感性和特异性,比较骨折与常规MRI诊断OCNFS的诊断效果。结果:CT与骨折OCNFS分级的模态一致性较好(κ = 0.689 ~ 0.715), CT与T1WI (κ = 0.427 ~ 0.594)、T2WI (κ = 0.462 ~ 0.604)的模态一致性较好。280个颈神经孔中104个经CT诊断为OCNFS。OCNFS对骨折、T1WI和T2WI的检出率分别为96.15%(100/104)、76.92%(80/104)和95.19%(99/104)。骨折检测OCNFS的敏感性为96.2%,特异性为97.2%。T1WI检测OCNFS的敏感性为76.9%,特异性为85.2%,T2WI检测OCNFS的敏感性为95.2%,特异性为73.9%。结论:骨折是评估OCNFS的可靠替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
MR-based evaluation of osseous cervical neural foraminal stenosis (OCNFS) using fast-field-echo resembling CT using restricted echo-spacing (FRACTURE).

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the feasibility of fast-field-echo resembling CT using restricted echo-spacing (FRACTURE) for evaluating osseous cervical neural foraminal stenosis (OCNFS).

Methods: A total of 280 cervical foramina from 28 patients with cervical radiculopathy (CR) were analyzed on oblique sagittal CT, FRACTURE, T1WI, and T2WI from bilateral C2/3 to C6/7 segments by three readers. CT served as the reference standard to identify OCNFS. Detection rate and grade of OCNFS were assessed. OCNFS severity was classified into four grades according to Park's system: Grade 0 (no stenosis), Grade 1 (mild stenosis), Grade 2 (moderate stenosis), and Grade 3 (severe stenosis). Inter-modality agreements of OCNFS grade were evaluated using linear weighted Cohen's kappa (κ). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to compare diagnostic performance between FRACTURE and conventional MRI for the diagnosis of OCNFS.

Results: The inter-modality agreement of OCNFS grade was substantial between CT and FRACTURE (κ = 0.689-0.715), and moderate between CT and T1WI (κ = 0.427-0.594) or T2WI (κ = 0.462-0.604). Among the 280 cervical neural foramina, 104 were diagnosed as OCNFS using CT. Detection rate of OCNFS was 96.15% (100/104) for FRACTURE, 76.92% (80/104) for T1WI, and 95.19% (99/104) for T2WI. FRACTURE achieved a sensitivity of 96.2% and a specificity of 97.2% for detecting OCNFS. T1WI demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 85.2%, while T2WI exhibited a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 73.9% for detecting OCNFS.

Conclusion: FRACTURE can provide a reliable alternative to CT for evaluating OCNFS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信