Courtney J Burns,Maedeh Marzoughi,Laura Sinko,Daniel Saddawi-Konefka,Kelcey Stratton,Matthew Sigakis,Matthew Wixson,Stefanie Simmons,Melissa Ramirez,Sachin Kheterpal,Adam Was
{"title":"“疼痛和痛苦对我来说太大了,我无法控制”:一项关于麻醉师在挑战性临床事件后情绪困扰的定性研究。","authors":"Courtney J Burns,Maedeh Marzoughi,Laura Sinko,Daniel Saddawi-Konefka,Kelcey Stratton,Matthew Sigakis,Matthew Wixson,Stefanie Simmons,Melissa Ramirez,Sachin Kheterpal,Adam Was","doi":"10.1097/aln.0000000000005660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nAnesthesiologists manage acute clinical events that can cause emotional distress. These experiences can lead to mental health challenges and affect clinicians' ability to provide care. However, the literature regarding specific factors of clinical events that cause emotional distress is limited, and their impact remains understudied. The objectives were to explore elements within anesthesiologists' practice environment contributing to distress associated with clinical events and elicit emotions and symptoms regarding clinical events that are distressing long-term.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nAnesthesiology faculty members at an academic institution were invited to engage in 30-minute individual qualitative interviews. They were prompted to reflect on a clinical event that caused them lasting emotional distress. Questions were based on risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder, focusing on two time periods: during the event and after it. To maintain study rigor, a trustworthiness framework was used that emphasized four components: transferability, dependability, credibility, and confirmability. A thematic analysis approach with two coders followed, with an audit trail maintained throughout.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nTwenty anesthesiology faculty members representing nine anesthesiology subspecialties were interviewed. Risk factors leading to emotional distress represented three areas: the clinical event, context, and patient. Clinical-related risk factors included clinical errors, a physician's first time encountering a clinical scenario, lack of adequate clinical support, and unexpected outcomes. Contextual risk factors involved legal and professional repercussions, mistreatment by non-anesthesiology colleagues, personal stress, and unsupportive leadership. Patient-related risk factors included having developed a close relationship with the patient, a patient's similarity to the clinician or their loved ones, and young patient age. Participants described emotions such as sadness, guilt, shame, helplessness, and self-doubt, and physical symptoms of emotional stress, flashbacks, and intrusive thoughts.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nAnesthesiologists experience profound and lasting emotional impacts from challenging clinical events. Future research should evaluate interventions to mitigate these impacts on anesthesiologists' mental health and career longevity.","PeriodicalId":7970,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"The pain and suffering are just too great for me to manage\\\": A qualitative study of emotional distress among anesthesiologists after challenging clinical events.\",\"authors\":\"Courtney J Burns,Maedeh Marzoughi,Laura Sinko,Daniel Saddawi-Konefka,Kelcey Stratton,Matthew Sigakis,Matthew Wixson,Stefanie Simmons,Melissa Ramirez,Sachin Kheterpal,Adam Was\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/aln.0000000000005660\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nAnesthesiologists manage acute clinical events that can cause emotional distress. These experiences can lead to mental health challenges and affect clinicians' ability to provide care. However, the literature regarding specific factors of clinical events that cause emotional distress is limited, and their impact remains understudied. The objectives were to explore elements within anesthesiologists' practice environment contributing to distress associated with clinical events and elicit emotions and symptoms regarding clinical events that are distressing long-term.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nAnesthesiology faculty members at an academic institution were invited to engage in 30-minute individual qualitative interviews. They were prompted to reflect on a clinical event that caused them lasting emotional distress. Questions were based on risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder, focusing on two time periods: during the event and after it. To maintain study rigor, a trustworthiness framework was used that emphasized four components: transferability, dependability, credibility, and confirmability. A thematic analysis approach with two coders followed, with an audit trail maintained throughout.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nTwenty anesthesiology faculty members representing nine anesthesiology subspecialties were interviewed. Risk factors leading to emotional distress represented three areas: the clinical event, context, and patient. Clinical-related risk factors included clinical errors, a physician's first time encountering a clinical scenario, lack of adequate clinical support, and unexpected outcomes. Contextual risk factors involved legal and professional repercussions, mistreatment by non-anesthesiology colleagues, personal stress, and unsupportive leadership. Patient-related risk factors included having developed a close relationship with the patient, a patient's similarity to the clinician or their loved ones, and young patient age. Participants described emotions such as sadness, guilt, shame, helplessness, and self-doubt, and physical symptoms of emotional stress, flashbacks, and intrusive thoughts.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nAnesthesiologists experience profound and lasting emotional impacts from challenging clinical events. Future research should evaluate interventions to mitigate these impacts on anesthesiologists' mental health and career longevity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005660\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000005660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"The pain and suffering are just too great for me to manage": A qualitative study of emotional distress among anesthesiologists after challenging clinical events.
BACKGROUND
Anesthesiologists manage acute clinical events that can cause emotional distress. These experiences can lead to mental health challenges and affect clinicians' ability to provide care. However, the literature regarding specific factors of clinical events that cause emotional distress is limited, and their impact remains understudied. The objectives were to explore elements within anesthesiologists' practice environment contributing to distress associated with clinical events and elicit emotions and symptoms regarding clinical events that are distressing long-term.
METHODS
Anesthesiology faculty members at an academic institution were invited to engage in 30-minute individual qualitative interviews. They were prompted to reflect on a clinical event that caused them lasting emotional distress. Questions were based on risk factors for post-traumatic stress disorder, focusing on two time periods: during the event and after it. To maintain study rigor, a trustworthiness framework was used that emphasized four components: transferability, dependability, credibility, and confirmability. A thematic analysis approach with two coders followed, with an audit trail maintained throughout.
RESULTS
Twenty anesthesiology faculty members representing nine anesthesiology subspecialties were interviewed. Risk factors leading to emotional distress represented three areas: the clinical event, context, and patient. Clinical-related risk factors included clinical errors, a physician's first time encountering a clinical scenario, lack of adequate clinical support, and unexpected outcomes. Contextual risk factors involved legal and professional repercussions, mistreatment by non-anesthesiology colleagues, personal stress, and unsupportive leadership. Patient-related risk factors included having developed a close relationship with the patient, a patient's similarity to the clinician or their loved ones, and young patient age. Participants described emotions such as sadness, guilt, shame, helplessness, and self-doubt, and physical symptoms of emotional stress, flashbacks, and intrusive thoughts.
CONCLUSIONS
Anesthesiologists experience profound and lasting emotional impacts from challenging clinical events. Future research should evaluate interventions to mitigate these impacts on anesthesiologists' mental health and career longevity.
期刊介绍:
With its establishment in 1940, Anesthesiology has emerged as a prominent leader in the field of anesthesiology, encompassing perioperative, critical care, and pain medicine. As the esteemed journal of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Anesthesiology operates independently with full editorial freedom. Its distinguished Editorial Board, comprising renowned professionals from across the globe, drives the advancement of the specialty by presenting innovative research through immediate open access to select articles and granting free access to all published articles after a six-month period. Furthermore, Anesthesiology actively promotes groundbreaking studies through an influential press release program. The journal's unwavering commitment lies in the dissemination of exemplary work that enhances clinical practice and revolutionizes the practice of medicine within our discipline.