{"title":"胫骨内侧开楔高位截骨术后软骨再生的存在与否不能预测长期预后。","authors":"Kang-Il Kim, Sang-Hak Lee, Jun-Ho Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to assess the whether the patients who showed mature cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment in a second look arthroscopy have better clinical and radiologic long-term outcomes and survivorship compared to immature cartilage regeneration following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent MOWHTO using a medial locked plate system were retrospectively reviewed between February 2008 and December 2012. All included patients had no concomitant cartilage-restoring procedures, underwent second-look arthroscopy at 2 years postoperatively, and were followed for at least 10 years. Based on arthroscopic findings in the medial femoral condyle, patients were classified into mature and immature cartilage regeneration groups. Clinical outcomes, including the primary outcome of total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, were compared between the groups using patient-reported outcome measures. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed to determine clinical significance. Radiologic progression of osteoarthritis was evaluated using serial changes in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and survivorship, defined as conversion to arthroplasty, was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 consecutive knees were included, with 34 in the mature group and 49 in the immature group. The mean follow-up period was 12.1 years (range, 10-15.2 years). No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes or the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the WOMAC scale (MCID 9.1; Group M 93.9% vs. Group I 97.9%, P=.564). Radiologic progression showed a trend of progressing more slowly in the mature group than in the immature group without significance at the latest follow-up(P=.113). The 10-year survival rate was 100% in the mature group and 95.6% in the immature group (P = .099).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence or absence of cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment does not predict better long-term outcomes, including radiologic progression, the achievement of MCID in clinical outcomes, or survivorship following MOWHTO.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, Retrospective comparative case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Presence or Absence of Cartilage Regeneration Following Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Does Not Predict Long-term Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Kang-Il Kim, Sang-Hak Lee, Jun-Ho Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The study aims to assess the whether the patients who showed mature cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment in a second look arthroscopy have better clinical and radiologic long-term outcomes and survivorship compared to immature cartilage regeneration following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent MOWHTO using a medial locked plate system were retrospectively reviewed between February 2008 and December 2012. All included patients had no concomitant cartilage-restoring procedures, underwent second-look arthroscopy at 2 years postoperatively, and were followed for at least 10 years. Based on arthroscopic findings in the medial femoral condyle, patients were classified into mature and immature cartilage regeneration groups. Clinical outcomes, including the primary outcome of total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, were compared between the groups using patient-reported outcome measures. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed to determine clinical significance. Radiologic progression of osteoarthritis was evaluated using serial changes in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and survivorship, defined as conversion to arthroplasty, was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 83 consecutive knees were included, with 34 in the mature group and 49 in the immature group. The mean follow-up period was 12.1 years (range, 10-15.2 years). No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes or the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the WOMAC scale (MCID 9.1; Group M 93.9% vs. Group I 97.9%, P=.564). Radiologic progression showed a trend of progressing more slowly in the mature group than in the immature group without significance at the latest follow-up(P=.113). The 10-year survival rate was 100% in the mature group and 95.6% in the immature group (P = .099).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence or absence of cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment does not predict better long-term outcomes, including radiologic progression, the achievement of MCID in clinical outcomes, or survivorship following MOWHTO.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, Retrospective comparative case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.004","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估与内侧开楔高位胫骨截骨术(MOWHTO)后未成熟软骨再生相比,在二次关节镜下显示内侧室成熟软骨再生的患者是否具有更好的临床和放射学长期预后和生存率。方法:回顾性分析2008年2月至2012年12月期间采用内侧锁定钢板系统行MOWHTO手术的患者。所有纳入的患者均未同时进行软骨修复手术,术后2年接受二次关节镜检查,随访至少10年。根据股骨内侧髁的关节镜检查结果,将患者分为成熟和未成熟软骨再生组。临床结果,包括西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)评分的主要结果,使用患者报告的结果测量方法在两组之间进行比较。评估最小临床重要差异(MCID)以确定临床意义。通过Kellgren-Lawrence分级的一系列变化评估骨关节炎的放射学进展,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法分析生存率(定义为关节置换术)。结果:共纳入83例连续膝关节,其中成熟组34例,未成熟组49例。平均随访时间为12.1年(10-15.2年)。在WOMAC量表上,临床结果或达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)的患者比例(MCID 9.1;M组93.9% vs. I组97.9%,P= 0.564)。最新随访时放射学进展显示成熟组比未成熟组进展慢,但无统计学意义(P= 0.113)。成熟组10年生存率为100%,未成熟组10年生存率为95.6% (P = 0.099)。结论:内侧间室软骨再生的存在或不存在并不能预测更好的长期预后,包括影像学进展、临床结果中MCID的实现或MOWHTO后的生存率。证据级别:IV,回顾性比较病例系列。
The Presence or Absence of Cartilage Regeneration Following Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Does Not Predict Long-term Outcomes.
Purpose: The study aims to assess the whether the patients who showed mature cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment in a second look arthroscopy have better clinical and radiologic long-term outcomes and survivorship compared to immature cartilage regeneration following medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO).
Methods: Patients who underwent MOWHTO using a medial locked plate system were retrospectively reviewed between February 2008 and December 2012. All included patients had no concomitant cartilage-restoring procedures, underwent second-look arthroscopy at 2 years postoperatively, and were followed for at least 10 years. Based on arthroscopic findings in the medial femoral condyle, patients were classified into mature and immature cartilage regeneration groups. Clinical outcomes, including the primary outcome of total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, were compared between the groups using patient-reported outcome measures. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was assessed to determine clinical significance. Radiologic progression of osteoarthritis was evaluated using serial changes in the Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and survivorship, defined as conversion to arthroplasty, was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: A total of 83 consecutive knees were included, with 34 in the mature group and 49 in the immature group. The mean follow-up period was 12.1 years (range, 10-15.2 years). No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes or the proportion of patients achieving minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the WOMAC scale (MCID 9.1; Group M 93.9% vs. Group I 97.9%, P=.564). Radiologic progression showed a trend of progressing more slowly in the mature group than in the immature group without significance at the latest follow-up(P=.113). The 10-year survival rate was 100% in the mature group and 95.6% in the immature group (P = .099).
Conclusion: The presence or absence of cartilage regeneration in the medial compartment does not predict better long-term outcomes, including radiologic progression, the achievement of MCID in clinical outcomes, or survivorship following MOWHTO.
Level of evidence: IV, Retrospective comparative case series.
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.