需要紧急手术干预的嵌顿性和绞窄性腹股沟疝的外科治疗:来自东部创伤外科协会的系统回顾、荟萃分析和实践管理指南。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Michael S Farrell, Zugui Zhang, Jordan Kirsch, Katie Bower, Curtis Bower, Rondi Gelbard, Alistair J Kent, Konstantin Khariton, Arielle Perez, Emanuele Lo Menzo, Judy B Rabinowitz, Asanthi Ratnasekera
{"title":"需要紧急手术干预的嵌顿性和绞窄性腹股沟疝的外科治疗:来自东部创伤外科协会的系统回顾、荟萃分析和实践管理指南。","authors":"Michael S Farrell, Zugui Zhang, Jordan Kirsch, Katie Bower, Curtis Bower, Rondi Gelbard, Alistair J Kent, Konstantin Khariton, Arielle Perez, Emanuele Lo Menzo, Judy B Rabinowitz, Asanthi Ratnasekera","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias require urgent surgical evaluation. Most literature on inguinal hernia management focuses on elective repairs. We aimed to provide evidence-based guidelines for managing inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An evidence-based systematic review was performed. Clinically relevant questions regarding defined Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and Outcome(s) were selected. These questions centered around the timing of intervention, the use of mesh, the surgical approach, and the use of antibiotics in patients who presented with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical interventions. A comprehensive literature search was completed from 1946 through March 11, 2024. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used in the creation of the recommendations. Consensus was achieved for all final recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,038 articles reviewed, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Early intervention (<6 hours from symptom onset) was associated with a lower incidence of bowel resection (odds ratio [OR], 0.1 [0.05, 0.29]; p < 0.0001). Hernia repair with mesh was associated with decreased incidence of recurrence (OR, 0.34 [0.13, 0.87]; p = 0.02) and mixed results for surgical site infections. Laparoscopic repairs decreased recurrence rates (OR, 0.75 [0.58, 0.99]; p = 0.03) and had shorter hospital length of stay (mean difference, -3.00 [-5.54, -0.47]; p < 0.01) compared with open repairs. There were not enough studies to address the routine use of postoperative antibiotics. Quality was deemed very low with much of the literature being retrospective studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conditionally recommend early surgical intervention for adult patients presenting with acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias who are deemed to require surgery. We conditionally recommend mesh repairs over primary tissue repairs and laparoscopic approaches over open approaches for this population. No recommendations can be made regarding the routine use of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical intervention: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Michael S Farrell, Zugui Zhang, Jordan Kirsch, Katie Bower, Curtis Bower, Rondi Gelbard, Alistair J Kent, Konstantin Khariton, Arielle Perez, Emanuele Lo Menzo, Judy B Rabinowitz, Asanthi Ratnasekera\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TA.0000000000004740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias require urgent surgical evaluation. Most literature on inguinal hernia management focuses on elective repairs. We aimed to provide evidence-based guidelines for managing inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An evidence-based systematic review was performed. Clinically relevant questions regarding defined Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and Outcome(s) were selected. These questions centered around the timing of intervention, the use of mesh, the surgical approach, and the use of antibiotics in patients who presented with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical interventions. A comprehensive literature search was completed from 1946 through March 11, 2024. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used in the creation of the recommendations. Consensus was achieved for all final recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7,038 articles reviewed, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Early intervention (<6 hours from symptom onset) was associated with a lower incidence of bowel resection (odds ratio [OR], 0.1 [0.05, 0.29]; p < 0.0001). Hernia repair with mesh was associated with decreased incidence of recurrence (OR, 0.34 [0.13, 0.87]; p = 0.02) and mixed results for surgical site infections. Laparoscopic repairs decreased recurrence rates (OR, 0.75 [0.58, 0.99]; p = 0.03) and had shorter hospital length of stay (mean difference, -3.00 [-5.54, -0.47]; p < 0.01) compared with open repairs. There were not enough studies to address the routine use of postoperative antibiotics. Quality was deemed very low with much of the literature being retrospective studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conditionally recommend early surgical intervention for adult patients presenting with acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias who are deemed to require surgery. We conditionally recommend mesh repairs over primary tissue repairs and laparoscopic approaches over open approaches for this population. No recommendations can be made regarding the routine use of antibiotics.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004740\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性嵌顿或绞窄腹股沟疝患者需要紧急手术评估。大多数关于腹股沟疝治疗的文献侧重于选择性修复。我们的目的是为需要紧急手术治疗的腹股沟疝提供循证指南。方法:进行循证系统评价。选择了有关定义人群(s)、干预(s)、比较(s)和结果(s)的临床相关问题。这些问题集中在干预的时机,补片的使用,手术入路,以及在出现嵌顿或绞窄腹股沟疝需要紧急手术干预的患者中使用抗生素。从1946年到2024年3月11日,完成了全面的文献检索。建议的分级、评估、发展和评价方法被用于制定建议。所有最后建议都取得了协商一致意见。结果:7038篇文献中,34篇符合纳入标准。结论:我们有条件地推荐急性嵌顿或绞窄腹股沟疝需要手术治疗的成年患者进行早期手术治疗。我们有条件地推荐网状修复而不是原发性组织修复,腹腔镜方法而不是开放方法。对于抗生素的常规使用,没有任何建议。证据水平:系统评价/荟萃分析;第三层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical intervention: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

Background: Patients with acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias require urgent surgical evaluation. Most literature on inguinal hernia management focuses on elective repairs. We aimed to provide evidence-based guidelines for managing inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical intervention.

Methods: An evidence-based systematic review was performed. Clinically relevant questions regarding defined Population(s), Intervention(s), Comparison(s), and Outcome(s) were selected. These questions centered around the timing of intervention, the use of mesh, the surgical approach, and the use of antibiotics in patients who presented with incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical interventions. A comprehensive literature search was completed from 1946 through March 11, 2024. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was used in the creation of the recommendations. Consensus was achieved for all final recommendations.

Results: Of 7,038 articles reviewed, 34 met the inclusion criteria. Early intervention (<6 hours from symptom onset) was associated with a lower incidence of bowel resection (odds ratio [OR], 0.1 [0.05, 0.29]; p < 0.0001). Hernia repair with mesh was associated with decreased incidence of recurrence (OR, 0.34 [0.13, 0.87]; p = 0.02) and mixed results for surgical site infections. Laparoscopic repairs decreased recurrence rates (OR, 0.75 [0.58, 0.99]; p = 0.03) and had shorter hospital length of stay (mean difference, -3.00 [-5.54, -0.47]; p < 0.01) compared with open repairs. There were not enough studies to address the routine use of postoperative antibiotics. Quality was deemed very low with much of the literature being retrospective studies.

Conclusion: We conditionally recommend early surgical intervention for adult patients presenting with acutely incarcerated or strangulated inguinal hernias who are deemed to require surgery. We conditionally recommend mesh repairs over primary tissue repairs and laparoscopic approaches over open approaches for this population. No recommendations can be made regarding the routine use of antibiotics.

Level of evidence: Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信