无阿片类药物麻醉在腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌切除术后短期恢复中的疗效:一项随机试验。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Frontiers in Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1588623
Liang Zhang, Xian-Hua Yu, Hui-Ming Zhang, Sheng Wang, Jian-Long Chen, Xue-Shan Li, Zhi-Yuan Chen
{"title":"无阿片类药物麻醉在腹腔镜辅助结直肠癌切除术后短期恢复中的疗效:一项随机试验。","authors":"Liang Zhang, Xian-Hua Yu, Hui-Ming Zhang, Sheng Wang, Jian-Long Chen, Xue-Shan Li, Zhi-Yuan Chen","doi":"10.3389/fonc.2025.1588623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate whether opioid-free anesthesia is non-inferior to opioid-based anesthesia in terms of short-term recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 102 participants, who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: opioid-free general anesthesia with thoracic epidural anesthesia (OFA) group and opioid-based general anesthesia with compound transversalis fascia nerve block (OA) group. The primary observation outcomes were the preoperative and postoperative Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in preoperative or postoperative QoR-40 scores between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.05). However, the OFA group demonstrated a significantly longer recovery time in the recovery room compared to the OA group (<i>p</i>< 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first meal after surgery, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative sufentanil dose, or postoperative 24-hour numerical rating scale (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opioid-free general anesthesia is not superior to opioid-based general anesthesia with transversalis fascia nerve block in terms of short-term postoperative recovery quality following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier 2023-12-08.</p>","PeriodicalId":12482,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Oncology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1588623"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia in short-term recovery following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection: a randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Liang Zhang, Xian-Hua Yu, Hui-Ming Zhang, Sheng Wang, Jian-Long Chen, Xue-Shan Li, Zhi-Yuan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fonc.2025.1588623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate whether opioid-free anesthesia is non-inferior to opioid-based anesthesia in terms of short-term recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 102 participants, who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: opioid-free general anesthesia with thoracic epidural anesthesia (OFA) group and opioid-based general anesthesia with compound transversalis fascia nerve block (OA) group. The primary observation outcomes were the preoperative and postoperative Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in preoperative or postoperative QoR-40 scores between the two groups (<i>p</i> = 0.05). However, the OFA group demonstrated a significantly longer recovery time in the recovery room compared to the OA group (<i>p</i>< 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first meal after surgery, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative sufentanil dose, or postoperative 24-hour numerical rating scale (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Opioid-free general anesthesia is not superior to opioid-based general anesthesia with transversalis fascia nerve block in terms of short-term postoperative recovery quality following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier 2023-12-08.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"1588623\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1588623\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2025.1588623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价无阿片类药物麻醉在腹腔镜辅助结直肠肿瘤切除术患者的短期恢复质量方面是否优于阿片类药物麻醉。方法:采用随机对照试验方法,将102例受试者随机分为胸廓硬膜外麻醉(OFA)组和复合横筋膜神经阻滞(OA)组。主要观察结果为术前和术后康复质量-40 (QoR-40)问卷得分。结果:两组患者术前、术后QoR-40评分比较,差异均无统计学意义(p = 0.05)。然而,与OA组相比,OFA组在恢复室的恢复时间明显更长(p< 0.05)。两组患者术后恶心呕吐、术后第一餐时间、术后拔管时间、术后舒芬太尼剂量、术后24小时数值评定量表差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:腹腔镜辅助结直肠肿瘤切除术术后短期恢复质量方面,无阿片类药物全麻并不优于阿片类药物全麻加筋膜横肌神经阻滞。临床试验注册:https://www.chictr.org.cn/,标识符2023-12-08。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of opioid-free anesthesia in short-term recovery following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection: a randomized trial.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether opioid-free anesthesia is non-inferior to opioid-based anesthesia in terms of short-term recovery quality in patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.

Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 102 participants, who were randomly assigned to one of two groups: opioid-free general anesthesia with thoracic epidural anesthesia (OFA) group and opioid-based general anesthesia with compound transversalis fascia nerve block (OA) group. The primary observation outcomes were the preoperative and postoperative Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire scores.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in preoperative or postoperative QoR-40 scores between the two groups (p = 0.05). However, the OFA group demonstrated a significantly longer recovery time in the recovery room compared to the OA group (p< 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative nausea and vomiting, time to first meal after surgery, postoperative drainage tube removal time, postoperative sufentanil dose, or postoperative 24-hour numerical rating scale (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Opioid-free general anesthesia is not superior to opioid-based general anesthesia with transversalis fascia nerve block in terms of short-term postoperative recovery quality following laparoscopic-assisted colorectal tumor resection.

Clinical trial registration: https://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier 2023-12-08.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Oncology
Frontiers in Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cancer Research
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.60%
发文量
6641
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Imaging and Diagnosis is dedicated to the publication of results from clinical and research studies applied to cancer diagnosis and treatment. The section aims to publish studies from the entire field of cancer imaging: results from routine use of clinical imaging in both radiology and nuclear medicine, results from clinical trials, experimental molecular imaging in humans and small animals, research on new contrast agents in CT, MRI, ultrasound, publication of new technical applications and processing algorithms to improve the standardization of quantitative imaging and image guided interventions for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信