Fereshteh Moradoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Mohammad Hossein Hakimi, Saeid Ghadimi, Reza Ebrahimoghli
{"title":"中低收入国家的结直肠癌筛查:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Fereshteh Moradoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Mohammad Hossein Hakimi, Saeid Ghadimi, Reza Ebrahimoghli","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health burden with higher mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is well established that CRC screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, data regarding uptake of CRC screening remains scarce in LMICs. Therefore, we aimed to quantify uptake of CRC screening in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for scientific literature published in any language using four online databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) from their inception to 1 August 2024. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of uptake of CRC screening modalities in LMICs. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine studies encompassing data from 19 LMICs were eligible for final inclusion in this systematic review. The pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening colonoscopy was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8). The pooled proportion of individuals who self-reported undertaking screening gFOBT was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3). Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of any CRC screening modalities was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5). Subgroup analyses showed that uptake of CRC screening did not vary significantly across available study-level variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed low colorectal cancer screening rates, impeding early detection at the population level. LMICs should prioritize context-specific strategies to improve screening uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fereshteh Moradoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Mohammad Hossein Hakimi, Saeid Ghadimi, Reza Ebrahimoghli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health burden with higher mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is well established that CRC screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, data regarding uptake of CRC screening remains scarce in LMICs. Therefore, we aimed to quantify uptake of CRC screening in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for scientific literature published in any language using four online databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) from their inception to 1 August 2024. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of uptake of CRC screening modalities in LMICs. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine studies encompassing data from 19 LMICs were eligible for final inclusion in this systematic review. The pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening colonoscopy was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8). The pooled proportion of individuals who self-reported undertaking screening gFOBT was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3). Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of any CRC screening modalities was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5). Subgroup analyses showed that uptake of CRC screening did not vary significantly across available study-level variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed low colorectal cancer screening rates, impeding early detection at the population level. LMICs should prioritize context-specific strategies to improve screening uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health burden with higher mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is well established that CRC screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, data regarding uptake of CRC screening remains scarce in LMICs. Therefore, we aimed to quantify uptake of CRC screening in LMICs.
Methods: We searched for scientific literature published in any language using four online databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) from their inception to 1 August 2024. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of uptake of CRC screening modalities in LMICs. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.
Results: Sixty-nine studies encompassing data from 19 LMICs were eligible for final inclusion in this systematic review. The pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening colonoscopy was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8). The pooled proportion of individuals who self-reported undertaking screening gFOBT was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3). Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of any CRC screening modalities was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5). Subgroup analyses showed that uptake of CRC screening did not vary significantly across available study-level variables.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed low colorectal cancer screening rates, impeding early detection at the population level. LMICs should prioritize context-specific strategies to improve screening uptake.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology: This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.