中低收入国家的结直肠癌筛查:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 1.6 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Fereshteh Moradoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Mohammad Hossein Hakimi, Saeid Ghadimi, Reza Ebrahimoghli
{"title":"中低收入国家的结直肠癌筛查:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Fereshteh Moradoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Mohammad Hossein Hakimi, Saeid Ghadimi, Reza Ebrahimoghli","doi":"10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health burden with higher mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is well established that CRC screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, data regarding uptake of CRC screening remains scarce in LMICs. Therefore, we aimed to quantify uptake of CRC screening in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for scientific literature published in any language using four online databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) from their inception to 1 August 2024. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of uptake of CRC screening modalities in LMICs. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine studies encompassing data from 19 LMICs were eligible for final inclusion in this systematic review. The pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening colonoscopy was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8). The pooled proportion of individuals who self-reported undertaking screening gFOBT was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3). Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of any CRC screening modalities was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5). Subgroup analyses showed that uptake of CRC screening did not vary significantly across available study-level variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed low colorectal cancer screening rates, impeding early detection at the population level. LMICs should prioritize context-specific strategies to improve screening uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"56 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fereshteh Moradoghli, Mir Hossein Aghaei, Mohammad Hossein Hakimi, Saeid Ghadimi, Reza Ebrahimoghli\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health burden with higher mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is well established that CRC screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, data regarding uptake of CRC screening remains scarce in LMICs. Therefore, we aimed to quantify uptake of CRC screening in LMICs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched for scientific literature published in any language using four online databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) from their inception to 1 August 2024. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of uptake of CRC screening modalities in LMICs. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine studies encompassing data from 19 LMICs were eligible for final inclusion in this systematic review. The pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening colonoscopy was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8). The pooled proportion of individuals who self-reported undertaking screening gFOBT was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3). Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of any CRC screening modalities was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5). Subgroup analyses showed that uptake of CRC screening did not vary significantly across available study-level variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis revealed low colorectal cancer screening rates, impeding early detection at the population level. LMICs should prioritize context-specific strategies to improve screening uptake.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-025-01274-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)仍然是全球主要的健康负担,在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)死亡率较高。CRC筛查可以降低CRC的发病率和死亡率。然而,关于中低收入国家接受结直肠癌筛查的数据仍然很少。因此,我们旨在量化中低收入国家CRC筛查的接受情况。方法:我们使用四个在线数据库(Scopus、Embase、PubMed和Web of Knowledge)检索从其建立到2024年8月1日期间以任何语言发表的科学文献。我们纳入了观察性研究,报告了中低收入国家采用结直肠癌筛查方式的流行情况。采用随机效应模型以95%置信区间(ci)估计合并患病率。使用亚组分析和元回归来调查异质性的潜在来源。结果:包含19个低收入国家数据的69项研究符合最终纳入本系统评价的条件。自我报告接受结肠镜筛查的总患病率为5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8)。自我报告接受筛查性ggfbt的个体总比例为11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3)。自我报告接受任何CRC筛查方式的总患病率为9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5)。亚组分析显示,CRC筛查的接受程度在现有研究水平变量之间没有显著差异。结论:该荟萃分析显示结直肠癌筛查率低,阻碍了人群水平的早期发现。低收入国家应优先考虑针对具体情况的策略,以提高筛查的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uptake of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major global health burden with higher mortality rate in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). It is well established that CRC screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. However, data regarding uptake of CRC screening remains scarce in LMICs. Therefore, we aimed to quantify uptake of CRC screening in LMICs.

Methods: We searched for scientific literature published in any language using four online databases (Scopus, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Knowledge) from their inception to 1 August 2024. We included observational studies reporting the prevalence of uptake of CRC screening modalities in LMICs. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were used to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.

Results: Sixty-nine studies encompassing data from 19 LMICs were eligible for final inclusion in this systematic review. The pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of screening colonoscopy was 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1-7.8). The pooled proportion of individuals who self-reported undertaking screening gFOBT was 11.5% (95% CI, 8.2-15.3). Pooled prevalence of self-reported uptake of any CRC screening modalities was 9.1% (95% CI, 6.2-12.5). Subgroup analyses showed that uptake of CRC screening did not vary significantly across available study-level variables.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis revealed low colorectal cancer screening rates, impeding early detection at the population level. LMICs should prioritize context-specific strategies to improve screening uptake.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信