诱捕器设计和信息素诱捕方式对甜玉米玉米夜蛾捕获的影响。

John W Mahas, Christophe Duplais, Kelly Hamby, Galen Dively, Anders S Huseth, David Owens, Thomas Kuhar, Hélène Doughty, Brian Currin, Brian A Nault
{"title":"诱捕器设计和信息素诱捕方式对甜玉米玉米夜蛾捕获的影响。","authors":"John W Mahas, Christophe Duplais, Kelly Hamby, Galen Dively, Anders S Huseth, David Owens, Thomas Kuhar, Hélène Doughty, Brian Currin, Brian A Nault","doi":"10.1093/jee/toaf180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie, is a highly destructive pest of sweet corn, Zea mays L. convar. saccharata Koern, because of larval feeding. Insecticides are used to manage this pest, and application frequency typically depends on H. zea abundance in the field. Pheromone-baited traps are used to estimate H. zea abundance, but differences in trap designs and lure types likely impact moth capture. This study comprehensively evaluated the influence of currently available traps, pheromone lures, and their combinations on H. zea moth captures across the eastern United States in 2022 and 2023. Moth capture was evaluated using combinations of the Hartstack, Heliothis, and green bucket traps with the Hercon (87% (Z)-11-hexadecenal, 8% (n)-hexadecanal, 3% (Z)-9-hexadecenal, and 2% (Z)-7-hexadecenal), Scentry, Trécé, and Alpha Scents (all 3 lures contained 97% (Z)-11-hexadecenal and 3% (Z)-9-hexadecenal) pheromone lures. Additionally, moth capture was evaluated using a modified Hartstack trap, which had the same bottom opening size as the Heliothis trap. Results demonstrated that the Hartstack trap captured significantly more moths than the Heliothis trap, but the modified Hartstack captured similar numbers of moths as the Heliothis trap, suggesting that the Hartstack's larger trap opening may increase moth capture compared with the modified Hartstack. The Hercon lure attracted significantly more moths than the Trécé and Alpha Scents lures, but attracted a similar number of moths as the Scentry lure. These findings are valuable for improving H. zea moth capture and will inform future studies that refine insecticide application frequency guidelines based on moth capture rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic entomology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trap design and pheromone lure type influence Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moth capture in sweet corn.\",\"authors\":\"John W Mahas, Christophe Duplais, Kelly Hamby, Galen Dively, Anders S Huseth, David Owens, Thomas Kuhar, Hélène Doughty, Brian Currin, Brian A Nault\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jee/toaf180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie, is a highly destructive pest of sweet corn, Zea mays L. convar. saccharata Koern, because of larval feeding. Insecticides are used to manage this pest, and application frequency typically depends on H. zea abundance in the field. Pheromone-baited traps are used to estimate H. zea abundance, but differences in trap designs and lure types likely impact moth capture. This study comprehensively evaluated the influence of currently available traps, pheromone lures, and their combinations on H. zea moth captures across the eastern United States in 2022 and 2023. Moth capture was evaluated using combinations of the Hartstack, Heliothis, and green bucket traps with the Hercon (87% (Z)-11-hexadecenal, 8% (n)-hexadecanal, 3% (Z)-9-hexadecenal, and 2% (Z)-7-hexadecenal), Scentry, Trécé, and Alpha Scents (all 3 lures contained 97% (Z)-11-hexadecenal and 3% (Z)-9-hexadecenal) pheromone lures. Additionally, moth capture was evaluated using a modified Hartstack trap, which had the same bottom opening size as the Heliothis trap. Results demonstrated that the Hartstack trap captured significantly more moths than the Heliothis trap, but the modified Hartstack captured similar numbers of moths as the Heliothis trap, suggesting that the Hartstack's larger trap opening may increase moth capture compared with the modified Hartstack. The Hercon lure attracted significantly more moths than the Trécé and Alpha Scents lures, but attracted a similar number of moths as the Scentry lure. These findings are valuable for improving H. zea moth capture and will inform future studies that refine insecticide application frequency guidelines based on moth capture rates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of economic entomology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of economic entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaf180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玉米耳虫(Helicoverpa zea Boddie)是一种对甜玉米极具破坏性的害虫。因为幼虫取食。使用杀虫剂来控制这种害虫,使用频率通常取决于田间玉米蚜的丰度。信息素诱捕器用于估计玉米螟的丰度,但诱捕器设计和诱捕器类型的差异可能会影响蛾的捕获。本研究综合评估了2022年和2023年美国东部地区现有诱捕器、信息素诱捕器及其组合对玉米蛾捕获的影响。采用Hartstack、Heliothis和绿桶诱捕器与Hercon (87% (Z)-11- 16 -烯醛、8% (n)- 16 -烯醛、3% (Z)-9- 16 -烯醛和2% (Z)-7-烯醛)、Scentry、tracei和Alpha Scents(3种诱捕器均含有97% (Z)-11- 16 -烯醛和3% (Z)-9-烯醛)信息素诱捕器组合进行捕蛾效果评价。此外,采用改良的Hartstack诱捕器(与Heliothis诱捕器底部开口大小相同)对蛾的捕获情况进行了评估。结果表明,Hartstack诱捕器捕获的飞蛾数量明显高于Heliothis诱捕器,但改良后的Hartstack诱捕器捕获的飞蛾数量与Heliothis诱捕器相近,说明Hartstack诱捕器的开口较大,可能比改良后的Hartstack诱捕器捕获的飞蛾数量更多。Hercon引诱的飞蛾数量明显多于trassicore和Alpha Scents引诱的飞蛾数量,但与Scentry引诱的飞蛾数量相似。这些发现对改善玉米蛾捕获有价值,并将为未来的研究提供信息,以改进基于蛾捕获率的杀虫剂使用频率指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trap design and pheromone lure type influence Helicoverpa zea (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) moth capture in sweet corn.

Corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea Boddie, is a highly destructive pest of sweet corn, Zea mays L. convar. saccharata Koern, because of larval feeding. Insecticides are used to manage this pest, and application frequency typically depends on H. zea abundance in the field. Pheromone-baited traps are used to estimate H. zea abundance, but differences in trap designs and lure types likely impact moth capture. This study comprehensively evaluated the influence of currently available traps, pheromone lures, and their combinations on H. zea moth captures across the eastern United States in 2022 and 2023. Moth capture was evaluated using combinations of the Hartstack, Heliothis, and green bucket traps with the Hercon (87% (Z)-11-hexadecenal, 8% (n)-hexadecanal, 3% (Z)-9-hexadecenal, and 2% (Z)-7-hexadecenal), Scentry, Trécé, and Alpha Scents (all 3 lures contained 97% (Z)-11-hexadecenal and 3% (Z)-9-hexadecenal) pheromone lures. Additionally, moth capture was evaluated using a modified Hartstack trap, which had the same bottom opening size as the Heliothis trap. Results demonstrated that the Hartstack trap captured significantly more moths than the Heliothis trap, but the modified Hartstack captured similar numbers of moths as the Heliothis trap, suggesting that the Hartstack's larger trap opening may increase moth capture compared with the modified Hartstack. The Hercon lure attracted significantly more moths than the Trécé and Alpha Scents lures, but attracted a similar number of moths as the Scentry lure. These findings are valuable for improving H. zea moth capture and will inform future studies that refine insecticide application frequency guidelines based on moth capture rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信