MF59佐剂与高剂量四价灭活疫苗在2022-2023流感季节预防经测试确认的流感的有效性比较

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Mahrukh Imran, Benjamin Chastek, Tim Bancroft, Noah Webb, Stephen I Pelton, Mendel D M Haag, Ian McGovern
{"title":"MF59佐剂与高剂量四价灭活疫苗在2022-2023流感季节预防经测试确认的流感的有效性比较","authors":"Mahrukh Imran, Benjamin Chastek, Tim Bancroft, Noah Webb, Stephen I Pelton, Mendel D M Haag, Ian McGovern","doi":"10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adjuvanted and higher-dose influenza vaccines are recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adults ≥65 years. This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) versus high-dose QIV (HD-QIV) in preventing test-confirmed influenza in US adults ≥65 years during the 2022-2023 season.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective test-negative design, electronic health records and claims data from the Optum Market Clarity database were used to identify adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV and were tested for influenza associated with acute respiratory or febrile illness in any setting or during emergency department visits or inpatient admissions (ED/inpatient). A doubly robust model was used, combining inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,228,481 adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV, 30,911 were tested for influenza and met selection criteria (2,361 cases; 28,550 controls). The rVE of aQIV vs. HD-QIV was -2.5% (95% CI, -13.4% to 7.4%) in any setting and 0.0% (95% CI, -15.9% to 13.7%) in ED/inpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar to previous studies, aQIV and HD-QIV provided comparable protection against test-confirmed influenza in any setting, including ED/inpatient, aligning with ACIP and other recommendations for adults ≥65 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":14006,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"107983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparable Effectiveness of MF59®-Adjuvanted and High-Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccines for Prevention of Test-Confirmed Influenza During the 2022-2023 Influenza Season.\",\"authors\":\"Mahrukh Imran, Benjamin Chastek, Tim Bancroft, Noah Webb, Stephen I Pelton, Mendel D M Haag, Ian McGovern\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adjuvanted and higher-dose influenza vaccines are recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adults ≥65 years. This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) versus high-dose QIV (HD-QIV) in preventing test-confirmed influenza in US adults ≥65 years during the 2022-2023 season.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective test-negative design, electronic health records and claims data from the Optum Market Clarity database were used to identify adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV and were tested for influenza associated with acute respiratory or febrile illness in any setting or during emergency department visits or inpatient admissions (ED/inpatient). A doubly robust model was used, combining inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,228,481 adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV, 30,911 were tested for influenza and met selection criteria (2,361 cases; 28,550 controls). The rVE of aQIV vs. HD-QIV was -2.5% (95% CI, -13.4% to 7.4%) in any setting and 0.0% (95% CI, -15.9% to 13.7%) in ED/inpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Similar to previous studies, aQIV and HD-QIV provided comparable protection against test-confirmed influenza in any setting, including ED/inpatient, aligning with ACIP and other recommendations for adults ≥65 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"107983\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2025.107983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:美国免疫实践咨询委员会(ACIP)推荐65岁以上成人接种佐剂和高剂量流感疫苗。本研究评估了佐剂四价流感疫苗(aQIV)与高剂量流感疫苗(HD-QIV)在预防2022-2023流感季节美国≥65岁成人经测试确认的流感方面的相对疫苗有效性(rVE)。方法:采用回顾性阴性检测设计,使用来自Optum Market Clarity数据库的电子健康记录和索赔数据,识别≥65岁接受aQIV或HD-QIV治疗的成年人,并在任何环境下、急诊就诊或住院期间(ED/住院)接受与急性呼吸道或发热性疾病相关的流感检测。采用双重稳健性模型,结合处理加权逆概率和逻辑回归。结果:在接受aQIV或HD-QIV治疗的4,228,481名≥65岁成人中,30,911例接受了流感检测并符合选择标准(2,361例;28550控制)。在任何情况下,aQIV与HD-QIV的rVE为-2.5% (95% CI, -13.4%至7.4%),在急诊科/住院情况下为0.0% (95% CI, -15.9%至13.7%)。结论:与之前的研究类似,aQIV和HD-QIV在任何环境下(包括急诊科/住院患者)对检测证实的流感提供了相当的保护,与ACIP和其他针对≥65岁成年人的建议一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparable Effectiveness of MF59®-Adjuvanted and High-Dose Quadrivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccines for Prevention of Test-Confirmed Influenza During the 2022-2023 Influenza Season.

Objective: Adjuvanted and higher-dose influenza vaccines are recommended by the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for adults ≥65 years. This study estimated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) versus high-dose QIV (HD-QIV) in preventing test-confirmed influenza in US adults ≥65 years during the 2022-2023 season.

Methods: In a retrospective test-negative design, electronic health records and claims data from the Optum Market Clarity database were used to identify adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV and were tested for influenza associated with acute respiratory or febrile illness in any setting or during emergency department visits or inpatient admissions (ED/inpatient). A doubly robust model was used, combining inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression.

Results: Of 4,228,481 adults ≥65 years who received aQIV or HD-QIV, 30,911 were tested for influenza and met selection criteria (2,361 cases; 28,550 controls). The rVE of aQIV vs. HD-QIV was -2.5% (95% CI, -13.4% to 7.4%) in any setting and 0.0% (95% CI, -15.9% to 13.7%) in ED/inpatient settings.

Conclusions: Similar to previous studies, aQIV and HD-QIV provided comparable protection against test-confirmed influenza in any setting, including ED/inpatient, aligning with ACIP and other recommendations for adults ≥65 years.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
1020
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Infectious Diseases (IJID) Publisher: International Society for Infectious Diseases Publication Frequency: Monthly Type: Peer-reviewed, Open Access Scope: Publishes original clinical and laboratory-based research. Reports clinical trials, reviews, and some case reports. Focuses on epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and control of infectious diseases. Emphasizes diseases common in under-resourced countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信