腰椎管狭窄手术后3个月6分钟步行测试和每日步数的最小临床重要差异。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Suzanne McIlroy, Yee Mah, Vassilios Tahtis, Abigail Beddard, Lindsay Bearne, John Weinman, Sam Norton
{"title":"腰椎管狭窄手术后3个月6分钟步行测试和每日步数的最小临床重要差异。","authors":"Suzanne McIlroy, Yee Mah, Vassilios Tahtis, Abigail Beddard, Lindsay Bearne, John Weinman, Sam Norton","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09085-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in two objective measures of walking: 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and mean daily step count in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, three months post-surgery. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to support result robustness and comparability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>97 patients (mean age 70 ± 8.3 years; 50 female) were recruited from three UK hospitals. 6MWD (metres) and mean daily step count (measured over 7 days with an accelerometer), and self-rated clinical questionnaires were assessed pre- and 12-weeks post-surgery. The anchor-based method used the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the satisfaction subscale of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff points for MCIDs for changes in the 6MWD and step count. The distribution-based method used 0.3 SD of the change scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anchor-based MCIDs for the 6MWD were 26 m (ODI) and 35 m (walking satisfaction). The step count MCID could not be determined using the ODI but was 680 steps when anchored to satisfaction. The distribution-based method estimated MCIDs of 34 m for the 6MWD and 750 steps for step count.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even modest improvements in walking capacity and daily step count may be meaningful to patients recovering from LSS surgery. Further research is needed to validate the MCID for daily step count however, the identified MCIDs for the 6MWD (26-35 m) and daily step count (680-750 steps) provide practical thresholds for assessing meaningful change and can be used to inform goal setting within rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimal clinically important difference of the 6-Minute walk test and daily step count at 3 months following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne McIlroy, Yee Mah, Vassilios Tahtis, Abigail Beddard, Lindsay Bearne, John Weinman, Sam Norton\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-025-09085-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in two objective measures of walking: 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and mean daily step count in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, three months post-surgery. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to support result robustness and comparability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>97 patients (mean age 70 ± 8.3 years; 50 female) were recruited from three UK hospitals. 6MWD (metres) and mean daily step count (measured over 7 days with an accelerometer), and self-rated clinical questionnaires were assessed pre- and 12-weeks post-surgery. The anchor-based method used the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the satisfaction subscale of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff points for MCIDs for changes in the 6MWD and step count. The distribution-based method used 0.3 SD of the change scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anchor-based MCIDs for the 6MWD were 26 m (ODI) and 35 m (walking satisfaction). The step count MCID could not be determined using the ODI but was 680 steps when anchored to satisfaction. The distribution-based method estimated MCIDs of 34 m for the 6MWD and 750 steps for step count.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even modest improvements in walking capacity and daily step count may be meaningful to patients recovering from LSS surgery. Further research is needed to validate the MCID for daily step count however, the identified MCIDs for the 6MWD (26-35 m) and daily step count (680-750 steps) provide practical thresholds for assessing meaningful change and can be used to inform goal setting within rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09085-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09085-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估术后3个月腰椎管狭窄患者两项客观步行指标的最小临床重要差异(MCID): 6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和平均每日步数。基于锚点和基于分布的方法均用于支持结果的稳健性和可比性。方法:97例患者(平均年龄70±8.3岁;50名女性)从英国三家医院招募。在手术前和术后12周评估6MWD(米)和平均每日步数(用加速度计在7天内测量)以及自评临床问卷。锚定法采用Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)和苏黎世跛行问卷的满意度子量表。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析用于确定MCIDs的最佳截止点,以了解6MWD和步数的变化。基于分布的方法使用0.3 SD的变化分数。结果:6MWD的基于锚定的MCIDs为26 m (ODI)和35 m(步行满意度)。步数MCID不能使用ODI确定,但当锚定到满意时为680步。基于分布的方法估计6MWD的mcid为34米,步数为750步。结论:即使步行能力和每日步数的适度改善也可能对LSS手术后恢复的患者有意义。需要进一步的研究来验证每日步数的mcd,然而,确定的6MWD(26-35米)和每日步数(680-750步)的mcd为评估有意义的变化提供了实用的阈值,并可用于指导康复过程中的目标设定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimal clinically important difference of the 6-Minute walk test and daily step count at 3 months following surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Purpose: This study aimed to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in two objective measures of walking: 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and mean daily step count in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, three months post-surgery. Both anchor-based and distribution-based approaches were used to support result robustness and comparability.

Methods: 97 patients (mean age 70 ± 8.3 years; 50 female) were recruited from three UK hospitals. 6MWD (metres) and mean daily step count (measured over 7 days with an accelerometer), and self-rated clinical questionnaires were assessed pre- and 12-weeks post-surgery. The anchor-based method used the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the satisfaction subscale of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cutoff points for MCIDs for changes in the 6MWD and step count. The distribution-based method used 0.3 SD of the change scores.

Results: Anchor-based MCIDs for the 6MWD were 26 m (ODI) and 35 m (walking satisfaction). The step count MCID could not be determined using the ODI but was 680 steps when anchored to satisfaction. The distribution-based method estimated MCIDs of 34 m for the 6MWD and 750 steps for step count.

Conclusion: Even modest improvements in walking capacity and daily step count may be meaningful to patients recovering from LSS surgery. Further research is needed to validate the MCID for daily step count however, the identified MCIDs for the 6MWD (26-35 m) and daily step count (680-750 steps) provide practical thresholds for assessing meaningful change and can be used to inform goal setting within rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信