老年对黑猩猩使用石器的参与度和效率有不同的影响。

IF 6.4 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
eLife Pub Date : 2025-07-15 DOI:10.7554/eLife.105411
Elliot Howard-Spink, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Susana Carvalho, Catherine Hobaiter, Katarina Almeida-Warren, Thibaud Gruber, Dora Biro
{"title":"老年对黑猩猩使用石器的参与度和效率有不同的影响。","authors":"Elliot Howard-Spink, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Susana Carvalho, Catherine Hobaiter, Katarina Almeida-Warren, Thibaud Gruber, Dora Biro","doi":"10.7554/eLife.105411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We know vanishingly little about how long-lived apes experience senescence in the wild, particularly with respect to their foraging behaviors. Chimpanzees use tools during foraging, and given the cognitive and physical challenges presented by tool use, tool-use behaviors are potentially at a heightened risk of senescence, though this has never been investigated in wild individuals. Accordingly, we sampled data from a longitudinal video archive that contained footage of wild chimpanzees using stone hammers and anvils to crack hard-shelled nuts (<i>nut cracking</i>) at an 'outdoor laboratory' over a 17-year period (with focal chimpanzees aging from approximately 39-44 to 56-61 years across this period). Over time, elderly chimpanzees began attending experimental nut-cracking sites less frequently than younger individuals. Several elderly chimpanzees exhibited reductions in efficiency across multiple stages of nut cracking, including taking longer to both select stone tools prior to use and use tools to crack open nuts and consume the associated pieces of kernel. Two chimpanzees began using less streamlined behavioral sequences to crack nuts, including a greater number of actions (such as more numerous hammer strikes). Notably, we report interindividual variability in the extent to which elderly chimpanzees' tool-use behaviors changed during our sample period - ranging from small to profound reductions in engagement and efficiency - as well as differences in the specific aspects of nut cracking that changed for each individual. We discuss the possible causes of these changes - and recommendations for future research - with reference to literature surrounding the senescence of captive and wild primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":11640,"journal":{"name":"eLife","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Old age variably impacts chimpanzee engagement and efficiency in stone tool use.\",\"authors\":\"Elliot Howard-Spink, Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Susana Carvalho, Catherine Hobaiter, Katarina Almeida-Warren, Thibaud Gruber, Dora Biro\",\"doi\":\"10.7554/eLife.105411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We know vanishingly little about how long-lived apes experience senescence in the wild, particularly with respect to their foraging behaviors. Chimpanzees use tools during foraging, and given the cognitive and physical challenges presented by tool use, tool-use behaviors are potentially at a heightened risk of senescence, though this has never been investigated in wild individuals. Accordingly, we sampled data from a longitudinal video archive that contained footage of wild chimpanzees using stone hammers and anvils to crack hard-shelled nuts (<i>nut cracking</i>) at an 'outdoor laboratory' over a 17-year period (with focal chimpanzees aging from approximately 39-44 to 56-61 years across this period). Over time, elderly chimpanzees began attending experimental nut-cracking sites less frequently than younger individuals. Several elderly chimpanzees exhibited reductions in efficiency across multiple stages of nut cracking, including taking longer to both select stone tools prior to use and use tools to crack open nuts and consume the associated pieces of kernel. Two chimpanzees began using less streamlined behavioral sequences to crack nuts, including a greater number of actions (such as more numerous hammer strikes). Notably, we report interindividual variability in the extent to which elderly chimpanzees' tool-use behaviors changed during our sample period - ranging from small to profound reductions in engagement and efficiency - as well as differences in the specific aspects of nut cracking that changed for each individual. We discuss the possible causes of these changes - and recommendations for future research - with reference to literature surrounding the senescence of captive and wild primates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"eLife\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12263151/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"eLife\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105411\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"eLife","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对长寿的猿类在野外如何经历衰老知之甚少,尤其是它们的觅食行为。黑猩猩在觅食过程中使用工具,并且考虑到工具使用带来的认知和身体挑战,工具使用行为潜在地增加了衰老的风险,尽管这从未在野生个体中进行过调查。因此,我们从纵向视频档案中采集数据,其中包含野生黑猩猩在“室外实验室”使用石锤和铁砧敲开硬壳坚果(坚果开裂)的镜头,时间长达17年(在此期间,焦点黑猩猩的年龄从39-44岁到56-61岁不等)。随着时间的推移,年老的黑猩猩开始比年轻的黑猩猩更少地参加实验性的坚果敲碎地点。几只老年黑猩猩在敲开坚果的多个阶段都表现出效率的下降,包括在使用之前选择石器和使用工具敲开坚果并消耗相关的仁块都要花更长的时间。两只黑猩猩开始使用不那么流线型的行为序列来敲开坚果,包括更多的动作(比如更多的锤子敲击)。值得注意的是,我们报告了在我们的样本期间,老年黑猩猩的工具使用行为变化的程度的个体间差异——从参与度和效率的微小下降到深刻下降——以及每个个体在掰坚果的具体方面的差异。我们将参考有关圈养和野生灵长类动物衰老的文献,讨论这些变化的可能原因,并对未来的研究提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Old age variably impacts chimpanzee engagement and efficiency in stone tool use.

We know vanishingly little about how long-lived apes experience senescence in the wild, particularly with respect to their foraging behaviors. Chimpanzees use tools during foraging, and given the cognitive and physical challenges presented by tool use, tool-use behaviors are potentially at a heightened risk of senescence, though this has never been investigated in wild individuals. Accordingly, we sampled data from a longitudinal video archive that contained footage of wild chimpanzees using stone hammers and anvils to crack hard-shelled nuts (nut cracking) at an 'outdoor laboratory' over a 17-year period (with focal chimpanzees aging from approximately 39-44 to 56-61 years across this period). Over time, elderly chimpanzees began attending experimental nut-cracking sites less frequently than younger individuals. Several elderly chimpanzees exhibited reductions in efficiency across multiple stages of nut cracking, including taking longer to both select stone tools prior to use and use tools to crack open nuts and consume the associated pieces of kernel. Two chimpanzees began using less streamlined behavioral sequences to crack nuts, including a greater number of actions (such as more numerous hammer strikes). Notably, we report interindividual variability in the extent to which elderly chimpanzees' tool-use behaviors changed during our sample period - ranging from small to profound reductions in engagement and efficiency - as well as differences in the specific aspects of nut cracking that changed for each individual. We discuss the possible causes of these changes - and recommendations for future research - with reference to literature surrounding the senescence of captive and wild primates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
eLife
eLife BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
3122
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: eLife is a distinguished, not-for-profit, peer-reviewed open access scientific journal that specializes in the fields of biomedical and life sciences. eLife is known for its selective publication process, which includes a variety of article types such as: Research Articles: Detailed reports of original research findings. Short Reports: Concise presentations of significant findings that do not warrant a full-length research article. Tools and Resources: Descriptions of new tools, technologies, or resources that facilitate scientific research. Research Advances: Brief reports on significant scientific advancements that have immediate implications for the field. Scientific Correspondence: Short communications that comment on or provide additional information related to published articles. Review Articles: Comprehensive overviews of a specific topic or field within the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信